Home support showed no clear difference in apgar score < 7 at 5 minutes compared with telephone triage (low certainty).
One‐to‐one structured care showed no clear difference in rate of caesarean section compared with usual care (high certainty).
One‐to‐one structured care showed no clear difference in rate of instrumental vaginal birth compared with usual care (high certainty).
One‐to‐one structured care showed no clear difference in serious maternal morbidity compared with usual care (moderate certainty).
One‐to‐one structured care showed no clear difference in use of epidural or any regional anaesthesia compared with usual care (high certainty).
It is very uncertain whether assessment changes rate of caesarean section compared with direct admission (very low certainty).
One‐to‐one structured care showed no clear difference in neonatal admission to special care compared with usual care (high certainty).
One‐to‐one structured care showed no clear difference in apgar score < 7 at 5 minutes compared with usual care (moderate certainty).
It is very uncertain whether assessment changes rate of instrumental vaginal birth compared with direct admission (very low certainty).
Assessment may leads to lower use of epidural or any regional anaesthesia compared with direct admission (low certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
It is very uncertain whether assessment changes apgar score < 7 at 5 minutes compared with direct admission (very low certainty).
Home support showed no clear difference in rate of caesarean section compared with telephone triage (moderate certainty).
It is very uncertain whether oral anti‐diabetic pharmacological therapies changes caearean section compared with placebo ‐ maternal outcomes (very low certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
Glibenclamide showed no clear difference in caesarean section compared with acarbose ‐ maternal outcomes (low certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.