Improvement in occlusion (Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) or other validated scale) · Adolescents and adults with malocclusion undergoing orthodontic treatment with fixed or removable appliances
1 finding from 1 review
Woodhouse 2015 (81 participants, 22 dropouts): PAR reduction intervention median 28.0 (IQR 21.0-38.0), control median 29.0 (IQR 24.0-31.0), placebo median 27.0 (IQR 20.0-35.0); percentage improvement medians 88.9 /…
1 study · 59 participants
GRADE not reported
Patient-reported need for analgesics · Adolescents and adults with malocclusion undergoing orthodontic treatment with fixed or removable appliances
Light vibrational forces (LVF) showed no clear difference in patient-reported need for analgesics during first week of initial… compared with conventional orthodontic appliance treatment (placebo or no adjunct) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) during alignment stage · Adolescents and adults with malocclusion undergoing fixed orthodontic appliance treatment
It is very uncertain whether low level laser therapy (LLLT) changes rate of orthodontic tooth movement during alignment stage… compared with conventional orthodontic appliance treatment (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events associated with treatment · Adults with oral cavity or oropharyngeal cancer
1 finding from 1 review
Total mortality · Adults with oral cavity or oropharyngeal cancer with nodal disease (stage N2 or N3)
PET-CT following chemoradiotherapy (neck dissection only if… showed no clear difference in total mortality compared with planned neck dissection before or after chemoradiotherapy (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events associated with treatment · Adults with oral cavity cancer
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events (BHNCSG 1998): flap necrosis, wound infection, fistula, vascular rupture, haematoma, seroma, chyle fistula; no complications in 45/76 modified radical ND and 54/72 supraomohyoid ND; 2 vs 1 postoperative…
1 study · 148 participants
Low
Rate of maxillary molar intrusion for correction of anterior open bite · Adolescents and adults with malocclusion undergoing fixed orthodontic appliance treatment
1 finding from 1 review
Two studies (62 participants), not pooled. Abellan 2021: no significant difference in molar intrusion at 3 months (1.25 vs 1.72 mm) or 6 months (1.09 vs 1.28 mm), nor rate per month. Hasan 2022: increased intrusion…
2 studies · 62 participants
GRADE not reported
Oral health-related quality of life · Adolescents and adults with malocclusion undergoing orthodontic treatment with fixed or removable appliances
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events associated with treatment · Adults with oral cavity or oropharyngeal cancer
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
Return to normal activities (days) · patients with benign gynaecological disease
1 finding from 1 review
Major short‐term complications (dichotomous) · patients with benign gynaecological disease
Laparoscopic hysterectomy showed no clear difference in major short‐term complications (dichotomous) compared with abdominal hysterectomy (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Return to normal activities (days) · patients with benign gynaecological disease
1 finding from 1 review
Long‐term outcomes · patients with benign gynaecological disease
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Long‐term complications (dichotomous) · patients with benign gynaecological disease
Laparoscopic hysterectomy showed no clear difference in long‐term complications (dichotomous) compared with vaginal hysterectomy (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intra‐operative visceral injury (dichotomous) · patients with benign gynaecological disease
Laparoscopic hysterectomy showed no clear difference in intra‐operative visceral injury (dichotomous) compared with vaginal hysterectomy (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Major short‐term complications (dichotomous) · patients with benign gynaecological disease
Laparoscopic hysterectomy showed no clear difference in major short‐term complications (dichotomous) compared with vaginal hysterectomy (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Return to normal activities (days) · patients with benign gynaecological disease
1 finding from 1 review
Long‐term outcomes · patients with benign gynaecological disease
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Long‐term complications (dichotomous) · patients with benign gynaecological disease
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intra‐operative visceral injury (dichotomous) · patients with benign gynaecological disease
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found