All‐cause mortality during hospital stay · people with critical limb ischaemia
1 finding from 1 review
Rate of amputation · people with critical limb ischaemia
It is very uncertain whether high cell dose changes amputation rate Assessed during in‐patient stay (Losordo 2012) compared with low cell dose (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Ulcer healing · people with critical limb ischaemia
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Rest‐pain relief · people with critical limb ischaemia
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Retention [ · trial participants being followed up for data collection
It is very uncertain whether monetary incentives: addition of monetary reward changes retention [ compared with usual follow‐up (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Retention [ · trial participants being followed up for data collection
Non‐monetary incentives: addition of pen showed no clear difference in retention [ compared with usual follow‐up (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Retention [ · trial participants being followed up for data collection
It is very uncertain whether maintaining participant engagement: newsletter changes retention [ compared with usual follow‐up (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Retention [ · trial participants being followed up for data collection
Maintaining participant engagement: post‐it note showed no clear difference in retention [ compared with usual follow‐up (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Retention [ · trial participants being followed up for data collection
Reminders: electronic reminder showed no clear difference in retention [ compared with usual follow‐up (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Retention [ · trial participants being followed up for data collection
It is very uncertain whether prompts: Telephone prompt changes retention [ compared with usual follow‐up (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Retention [ · trial participants being followed up for data collection
Prompts: personalised prompt showed no clear difference in retention [ compared with usual follow‐up (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Retention [ · trial participants being followed up for data collection
Monetary incentives: addition of monetary incentives may leads to higher retention [ compared with usual follow‐up (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Mortality due to bleeding · women with complete placenta praevia and intractable bleeding following caesarean section
1 finding from 1 review
Hysterectomy to control bleeding · women with complete placenta praevia and intractable bleeding following caesarean section
1 finding from 1 review
Serious maternal morbidity (renal or respiratory failure, cardiac arrest or multiple organ failure) · women with complete placenta praevia and intractable bleeding following caesarean section
1 finding from 1 review
Number of women with total blood loss 1000 mL or more after randomisation · women with complete placenta praevia and intractable bleeding following caesarean section
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Mean blood loss (mL) (trialist defined) · women with complete placenta praevia and intractable bleeding following caesarean section
1 finding from 1 review
Blood transfusion (red cell or whole blood) · women with complete placenta praevia and intractable bleeding following caesarean section
It is very uncertain whether bakri balloon tamponade changes blood transfusion (red cell or whole blood) compared with haemostatic square suturing to the lower segment of the uterus… (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Side effects of the intervention (e.g. trauma, necrosis) · women with complete placenta praevia and intractable bleeding following caesarean section
1 finding from 1 review
Any cancer risk No. of participants: 19,475 (3 RCTs) · Participants in trials with low risk of bias
Highest showed no clear difference in any cancer risk No. of participants: 19,475 (3 RCTs) compared with lowest selenium exposure (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review