Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

1,000 questions in 69 reviews · Urology

current versions
No studies 196 · 19.6%Ungraded 33 · 3.3%Very low 198 · 19.8%Low 354 · 35.4%Moderate 206 · 20.6%High 13 · 1.3%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Sunitinib vs pembrolizumab + axitinib (targeted agent versus immunotherapy + targeted agent)
Progression‐free survival(absolute effect size estimates based on survival rate at 12 months) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)
Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (2020) · Cochrane
HR 1.45 [1.19, 1.76]1 study · 861 participantsModerate
Sunitinib vs pembrolizumab + axitinib (targeted agent versus immunotherapy + targeted agent)
Overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival rate at 12 months) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)
Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (2020) · Cochrane
HR 1.9 [1.36, 2.65]1 study · 861 participantsModerate
Sunitinib vs pembrolizumab + axitinib (targeted agent versus immunotherapy + targeted agent)
Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)
Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.9 [0.81, 1.02]1 study · 854 participantsLow
Sunitinib vs pembrolizumab + axitinib (targeted agent versus immunotherapy + targeted agent)
Health‐related quality of life4 · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)
Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Sunitinib vs atezolizumab + bevacizumab (targeted agent versus immunotherapy + targeted agent)
Progression‐free survival(absolute effect size estimates based on survival rate at 12 months) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)
Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (2020) · Cochrane
HR 1.18 [1.02, 1.36]2 studies · 1117 participantsLow
Sorafenib vs sunitinib (targeted agent versus targeted agent)
Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (any cell type)
Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.99 [0.85, 1.14]1 study · 353 participantsVery low
Sunitinib vs atezolizumab + bevacizumab (targeted agent versus immunotherapy + targeted agent)
Overall survival(absolute effect size estimates based on survival rate at 24 months) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)
Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (2020) · Cochrane
HR 0.99 [0.73, 1.33]2 studies · 1117 participantsVery low
Sunitinib vs atezolizumab + bevacizumab (targeted agent versus immunotherapy + targeted agent)
Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)
Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (2020) · Cochrane
RR 1.22 [1, 1.49]2 studies · 1098 participantsVery low
Sunitinib vs atezolizumab + bevacizumab (targeted agent versus immunotherapy + targeted agent)
Health‐related quality of life · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)
Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 691 participantsLow
Sunitinib vs IMA901 + sunitinib (targeted agent versus tumour vaccine + targeted agent)
Progression‐free survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival rate at 12 months) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)
Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (2020) · Cochrane
HR 0.95 [0.7, 1.3]1 study · 339 participantsVery low
Sunitinib vs IMA901 + sunitinib (targeted agent versus tumour vaccine + targeted agent)
Overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival rate at 12 months) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)
Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (2020) · Cochrane
HR 0.75 [0.54, 1.04]1 study · 339 participantsLow
Sunitinib vs IMA901 + sunitinib (targeted agent versus tumour vaccine + targeted agent)
Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)
Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.74 [0.59, 0.95]1 study · 334 participantsLow
Sunitinib vs IMA901 + sunitinib (targeted agent versus tumour vaccine + targeted agent)
Health‐related quality of life6 · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)
Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Sunitinib vs interferon‐α (IFN‐α) (targeted agent versus classic immunotherapy)
Progression‐free survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival rate at 6 months) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)
Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (2020) · Cochrane
HR 0.54 [0.45, 0.64]1 study · 750 participantsModerate
Sunitinib vs interferon‐α (IFN‐α) (targeted agent versus classic immunotherapy)
Overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival rate at 24 months) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)
Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (2020) · Cochrane
HR 0.82 [0.67, 1]1 study · 750 participantsLow
Sunitinib vs interferon‐α (IFN‐α) (targeted agent versus classic immunotherapy)
Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4)assessed as: CTCAE v3.0 · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)
Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (2020) · Cochrane
RR 1.75 [1.43, 2.16]1 study · 735 participantsModerate
Sorafenib vs sunitinib (targeted agent versus targeted agent)
Health‐related quality of life5 · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (any cell type)
Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Sunitinib vs interferon‐α (IFN‐α) (targeted agent versus classic immunotherapy)
Health‐related quality of life · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)
Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 544 participantsModerate
Temsirolimus vs IFN‐α (targeted agent versus classic immunotherapy)
Progression‐free survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival rate at 12 months) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (any cell type [80% clear cell])
Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (2020) · Cochrane
HR 0.74 [0.6, 0.91]1 study · 416 participantsLow
Temsirolimus vs IFN‐α (targeted agent versus classic immunotherapy)
Overall survival survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival rate at 12 months ) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (any cell type [80% clear cell])
Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (2020) · Cochrane
HR 0.78 [0.63, 0.97]1 study · 416 participantsModerate
Temsirolimus vs IFN‐α (targeted agent versus classic immunotherapy)
Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (any cell type [80% clear cell])
Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.86 [0.76, 0.97]1 study · 408 participantsLow
Temsirolimus vs IFN‐α (targeted agent versus classic immunotherapy)
Health‐related quality of life · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (any cell type [80% clear cell])
Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 401 participantsLow
Sunitinib vs atezolizumab (targeted therapy versus immunotherapy)
Progression‐free survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival rate at 12 months) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)
Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (2020) · Cochrane
HR 0.84 [0.58, 1.22]1 study · 204 participantsVery low
Sunitinib vs atezolizumab (targeted therapy versus immunotherapy)
Overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival rate at 24 months) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)
Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (2020) · Cochrane
HR 0.94 [0.58, 1.54]1 study · 204 participantsVery low
Sunitinib vs atezolizumab (targeted therapy versus immunotherapy)
Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)
Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (2020) · Cochrane
RR 1.73 [1.32, 2.27]1 study · 203 participantsModerate
Sunitinib vs atezolizumab (targeted therapy versus immunotherapy)
Health‐related quality of life · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)
Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 157 participantsLow
Bevacizumab + IFN vs IFN (+ placebo) (targeted agent + classic immunotherapy versus classic immunotherapy)
Progression‐free survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival rate at 12 months) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)
Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (2020) · Cochrane
HR 0.68 [0.6, 0.77]2 studies · 1381 participantsModerate
Pazopanib vs sunitinib (targeted agent versus targeted agent)
Progression‐free survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival rate at 12 months) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)
Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (2020) · Cochrane
HR 1.05 [0.9, 1.23]1 study · 1110 participantsLow
Bevacizumab + IFN vs IFN (+ placebo) (targeted agent + classic immunotherapy versus classic immunotherapy)
Overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival rate at 24 months) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)
Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (2020) · Cochrane
HR 0.88 [0.79, 0.99]2 studies · 1381 participantsLow
Bevacizumab + IFN vs IFN (+ placebo) (targeted agent + classic immunotherapy versus classic immunotherapy)
Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)
Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (2020) · Cochrane
RR 1.31 [1.2, 1.42]2 studies · 1356 participantsModerate
Bevacizumab + IFN vs IFN (+ placebo) (targeted agent + classic immunotherapy versus classic immunotherapy)
Health‐related quality of life3 · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)
Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Temsirolimus + IFN‐α vs IFN‐α (targeted agent + classic immunotherapy versus classic immunotherapy)
Progression‐free survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival rate at 12 months) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (any cell type [80% clear cell])
Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (2020) · Cochrane
HR 0.76 [0.62, 0.93]1 study · 417 participantsLow
Temsirolimus + IFN‐α vs IFN‐α (targeted agent + classic immunotherapy versus classic immunotherapy)
Overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival rate at 12 months) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (any cell type [80% clear cell])
Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (2020) · Cochrane
HR 0.93 [0.75, 1.15]1 study · 417 participantsLow
Temsirolimus + IFN‐α vs IFN‐α (targeted agent + classic immunotherapy versus classic immunotherapy)
Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (any cell type [80% clear cell])
Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (2020) · Cochrane
RR 1.12 [1.02, 1.22]1 study · 408 participantsLow
Temsirolimus + IFN‐α vs IFN‐α (targeted agent + classic immunotherapy versus classic immunotherapy)
Health‐related quality of life · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (any cell type [80% clear cell])
Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 394 participantsLow
Temsirolimus + bevacizumab vs bevacizumab + IFN‐α (targeted agent + targeted agent versus targeted agent + classic immunotherapy)
Progression‐free survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival rate at 12 months) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (any cell type [80% clear cell])
Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (2020) · Cochrane
HR 1.1 [0.9, 1.34]1 study · 791 participantsLow
Temsirolimus + bevacizumab vs bevacizumab + IFN‐α (targeted agent + targeted agent versus targeted agent + classic immunotherapy)
Overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival rate at 24 months) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (any cell type [80% clear cell])
Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (2020) · Cochrane
HR 1.08 [0.9, 1.3]1 study · 791 participantsModerate
Temsirolimus + bevacizumab vs bevacizumab + IFN‐α (targeted agent + targeted agent versus targeted agent + classic immunotherapy)
Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (any cell type [80% clear cell])
Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (2020) · Cochrane
RR 1.05 [0.98, 1.13]1 study · 784 participantsLow
Pazopanib vs sunitinib (targeted agent versus targeted agent)
Overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival rate at 24 months) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)
Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (2020) · Cochrane
HR 0.92 [0.8, 1.06]1 study · 1110 participantsLow
Temsirolimus + bevacizumab vs bevacizumab + IFN‐α (targeted agent + targeted agent versus targeted agent + classic immunotherapy)
Health‐related quality of life3 · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (any cell type [80% clear cell])
Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Everolimus + bevacizumab vs IFN α‐2a + bevacizumab (targeted agent + targeted agent versus targeted agent + classic immunotherapy)
Progression‐free survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival rate at 18 months) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (any cell type)
Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (2020) · Cochrane
HR 0.91 [0.69, 1.2]1 study · 365 participantsVery low
Everolimus + bevacizumab vs IFN α‐2a + bevacizumab (targeted agent + targeted agent versus targeted agent + classic immunotherapy)
Overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival rate at 24 months) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (any cell type)
Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (2020) · Cochrane
HR 1.01 [0.75, 1.36]1 study · 365 participantsVery low
Everolimus + bevacizumab vs IFN α‐2a + bevacizumab (targeted agent + targeted agent versus targeted agent + classic immunotherapy)
Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (any cell type)
Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (2020) · Cochrane
RR 1.06 [0.95, 1.18]1 study · 361 participantsLow
Everolimus + bevacizumab vs IFN α‐2a + bevacizumab (targeted agent + targeted agent versus targeted agent + classic immunotherapy)
Health‐related quality of life5 · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (any cell type)
Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Sunitinib vs nivolumab + ipilimumab (targeted agent versus combinations of immunotherapy)
Progression‐free survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival rate at 30 months) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type); IMDC intermediate, poor risk patients only.
Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (2020) · Cochrane
HR 1.3 [1.11, 1.52]1 study · 847 participantsLow
Sunitinib vs nivolumab + ipilimumab (targeted agent versus combinations of immunotherapy)
Overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival rate at 30 months) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type); IMDC intermediate, poor risk patients only.
Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (2020) · Cochrane
HR 1.52 [1.23, 1.89]1 study · 847 participantsHigh
Sunitinib vs nivolumab + ipilimumab (targeted agent versus combinations of immunotherapy)
Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type); IMDC intermediate, poor risk patients only.
Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (2020) · Cochrane
RR 1.37 [1.22, 1.53]1 study · 1082 participantsModerate
Sunitinib vs nivolumab + ipilimumab (targeted agent versus combinations of immunotherapy)
Health‐related quality of life · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type); IMDC intermediate, poor risk patients only.
Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 460 participantsModerate
Pazopanib vs placebo (targeted agent versus placebo)
Progression‐free survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival rate at 12 months) · Previous treated and treatment‐naïve (54%) metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)
Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (2020) · Cochrane
HR 0.46 [0.34, 0.62]1 study · 435 participantsHigh
Pazopanib vs sunitinib (targeted agent versus targeted agent)
Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)
Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (2020) · Cochrane
RR 1.01 [0.94, 1.09]1 study · 1102 participantsLow