Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

664 questions in 25 reviews · Endodontics and dental trauma

current versions
No studies 111 · 16.7%Ungraded 417 · 62.8%Very low 69 · 10.4%Low 50 · 7.5%Moderate 16 · 2.4%High 1 · 0.2%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Vitapex (calcium hydroxide/iodoform) vs Calcium hydroxide (CH)
Radiological failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 6 and 12 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.11 [0.01, 1.94]1 study · 40 participantsUngraded
Tempophore vs Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA)
Radiological failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 12 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
RR 2.69 [0.57, 12.70]1 study · 56 participantsUngraded
ProRoot MTA vs OrthoMTA
Radiological failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 12 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.50 [0.05, 5.33]1 study · 94 participantsUngraded
Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) + calcium hydroxide vs Calcium hydroxide (CH)
Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 6 and 12 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
No clinical failure in any participant (Fernandes 2015); not estimable1 study · 30 participantsUngraded
Calcium hydroxide (CH) vs Formocresol (FC)
Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 12 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
RR 1.87 [1.22, 2.89]6 studies · 332 participantsModerate
Portland cement (PC) vs Enamel matrix derivative (EMD)
Radiological failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 24 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.57 [0.18, 1.78]1 study · 70 participantsUngraded
Diode laser vs Ferric sulphate (FS)
Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 6 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.23 [0.04, 1.30]3 studies · 130 participantsLow
Biodentine vs Calcium hydroxide (CH)
Radiological failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 6 and 12 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
No radiological failure in any participant; not estimable1 study · 62 participantsUngraded
Calcium hydroxide (CH) vs Ferric sulphate (FS)
Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 12 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
RR 3.41 [0.37, 31.61]2 studies · 122 participantsLow
Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) vs Full strength or 1:5 diluted formocresol (FC)
Radiological failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 12 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.41 [0.19, 0.89]12 studies · 740 participantsModerate
Self-etch adhesive + acetone-based total-etch adhesive vs Non-rinse conditioner + acetone-based total-etch adhesive
Radiological failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 12 and 24 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
RR 1.00 [0.07, 14.90]1 study · 40 participantsVery low
Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) vs 3Mix (ciprofloxacin + metronidazole + minocycline)
Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 12 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.17 [0.04, 0.70]1 study · 160 participantsLow
Self-etch adhesive + acetone-based total-etch adhesive vs Total-etching 36% phosphoric acid + acetone-based total-etch adhesive
Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 12 and 24 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
RR 1.00 [0.07, 14.90]1 study · 40 participantsVery low
Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) + sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) vs Calcium hydroxide + sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl)
Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 6 and 12 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
No clinical failure in any participant (Akcay 2014); not estimable1 study · 62 participantsUngraded
Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) vs Portland cement (PC)
Radiological failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 24 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.50 [0.10, 2.56]3 studies · 130 participantsUngraded
Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) vs Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) + calcium hydroxide
Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 6 and 12 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
No clinical failure in any participant (Fernandes 2015); not estimable1 study · 30 participantsUngraded
ProRoot MTA vs RetroMTA
Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 6 and 12 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
No clinical failure in any participant (Kang 2015); not estimable1 study · 96 participantsUngraded
Propolis vs Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA)
Radiological failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 6 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
RR 3.50 [0.80, 15.23]1 study · 50 participantsUngraded
Biodentine vs Formocresol (FC)
Radiological failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 6 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
No radiological failure in any participant; not estimable1 study · 112 participantsUngraded
Non-rinse conditioner + acetone-based total-etch adhesive vs Calcium hydroxide (CH)
Radiological failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 12 and 24 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
RR 3.00 [0.13, 69.52]1 study · 40 participantsVery low
Calcium hydroxide (CH) vs Portland cement (PC)
Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 12 and 24 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
RR 13.00 [0.80, 212.02]1 study · 30 participantsUngraded
Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) vs Full strength or 1:5 diluted formocresol (FC)
Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 12 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.31 [0.10, 0.93]12 studies · 740 participantsModerate
Total-etching 36% phosphoric acid + acetone-based total-etch adhesive vs Calcium hydroxide (CH)
Radiological failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 24 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
RR 7.00 [0.38, 127.33]1 study · 40 participantsVery low
Calcium hydroxide (CH) vs Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) + sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl)
Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 12 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
RR 3.00 [0.13, 70.92]1 study · 62 participantsUngraded
Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) vs Portland cement (PC)
Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 6, 12 and 24 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.20 [0.01, 4.02]3 studies · 130 participantsUngraded
Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) vs Ferric sulphate (FS)
Radiological failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 12 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.42 [0.17, 1.02]2 studies · 110 participantsLow
Full strength formocresol (FC) vs 1:25 diluted formocresol (FC)
Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 6 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
No event in any participant (Goyal 2014); not estimable1 study · 30 participantsUngraded
Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) + calcium hydroxide vs Calcium hydroxide (CH)
Radiological failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 12 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.50 [0.15, 1.64]1 study · 30 participantsUngraded
Metapex (calcium hydroxide/iodoform) vs Zinc oxide and propolis (ZOP)
Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 12 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
RR 2.00 [0.20, 19.91]1 study · 32 participantsUngraded
Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) vs Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) + calcium hydroxide
Radiological failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 12 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
RR 1.00 [0.24, 4.18]1 study · 30 participantsUngraded
Diode laser + mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) vs Formocresol (FC) + zinc oxide and eugenol (ZOE)
Radiological failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · mean 15.7 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
RR 4.00 [0.48, 33.42]1 study · 52 participantsUngraded
Endoflas chlorophenol free (Endoflas-CF) vs Zinc oxide and propolis (ZOP)
Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 6 and 12 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
Endoflas-CF vs ZOP (Al-Ostwani 2016); no significant difference1 studyUngraded
Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) vs Calcium hydroxide (CH)
Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 12 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.16 [0.04, 0.70]4 studies · 150 participantsModerate
Calcium hydroxide cement (Dycal) vs Calcium sulphate hemihydrate (DentoGen)
Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 12 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
RR 4.00 [0.49, 32.72]1 study · 40 participantsVery low
Zinc oxide and eugenol (ZOE) vs ZOE + calcium hydroxide + iodoform (unnamed product)
Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 12 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.05 [0.00, 0.76]1 study · 109 participantsUngraded
Calcium hydroxide (CH) vs Portland cement (PC)
Radiological failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 12 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
RR 17.00 [1.07, 270.41]1 study · 30 participantsUngraded
Biodentine vs Propolis
Radiological failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 6 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.43 [0.12, 1.47]1 study · 50 participantsUngraded
Acetone-based total-etch adhesive vs Calcium hydroxide (CH)
Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · up to 24 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
No clinical failure in any participant (Demir 2007); not estimable (direct pulp capping)1 study · 40 participantsUngraded
Vitapex (calcium hydroxide/iodoform) vs 3Mix (ciprofloxacin + metronidazole + minocycline)
Radiological failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 12 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
RR 1.83 [0.80, 4.19]1 study · 50 participantsUngraded
Endoflas (CH + ZOE + iodoform) vs Zinc oxide and eugenol (ZOE)
Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 6 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.26 [0.05, 1.50]2 studies · 80 participantsModerate
OrthoMTA vs RetroMTA
Radiological failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 12 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.70 [0.12, 3.98]1 study · 96 participantsUngraded
Portland cement (PC) vs Portland cement + iodoform or Portland cement + zirconium oxide
Radiological failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · up to 24 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
No events in any participant; not estimable1 study · 30 participantsUngraded
Metapex (calcium hydroxide/iodoform) vs Endoflas chlorophenol free (Endoflas-CF)
Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 12 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
RR 1.00 [0.16, 6.25]1 study · 32 participantsUngraded
3Mix (ciprofloxacin + metronidazole + minocycline) vs 3Mixtatin
Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 12 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
RR 4.00 [1.22, 13.11]1 study · 160 participantsLow
Diode laser + mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) vs Formocresol (FC) + zinc oxide and eugenol (ZOE)
Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · mean 15.7 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
No clinical failure in any participant (Saltzman 2005); not estimable1 study · 52 participantsUngraded
Calcium hydroxide/iodoform (CH/iodoform) vs Full strength formocresol (FC)
Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 12 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
RR 9.11 [3.04, 27.31]1 study · 67 participantsUngraded
Portland cement (PC) vs Enamel matrix derivative (EMD)
Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 6, 12 and 24 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.67 [0.12, 3.75]1 study · 70 participantsUngraded
Vitapex (calcium hydroxide/iodoform) vs 3Mix (ciprofloxacin + metronidazole + minocycline)
Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 12 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
RR 1.00 [0.07, 15.12]1 study · 50 participantsUngraded
Metapex (calcium hydroxide/iodoform) vs Endoflas (CH + ZOE + iodoform)
Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 6 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.33 [0.01, 7.58]2 studies · 92 participantsUngraded
Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) vs Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl)
Radiological failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth · 24 months
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.33 [0.04, 2.99]1 study · 50 participantsUngraded