Intervention not reported
Index test result · of people with HIV‐negative or unknown HIV status who are considered eligible for systematic screening for tuberculosis disease. Role of…
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
0 participants
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
True positives (participants with tuberculosis disease) · of people with HIV‐negative or unknown HIV status who are considered eligible for systematic screening for tuberculosis disease. Role of…
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
3 participants
Very low
Intervention not reported
False negatives (participants incorrectly classified as not having tuberculosis disease) · of people with HIV‐negative or unknown HIV status who are considered eligible for systematic screening for tuberculosis disease. Role of…
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
2 participants
Very low
Intervention not reported
True negatives (participants without tuberculosis disease) · of people with HIV‐negative or unknown HIV status who are considered eligible for systematic screening for tuberculosis disease. Role of…
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
871 participants
Low
Intervention not reported
Xpert Ultra result
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
True‐negatives (patients without pleural TB)
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
False‐positives (patients incorrectly classified as having pleural TB)
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Xpert MTB/RIF result
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Xpert Ultra result
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
True‐positives (patients with lymph node TB)
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
False‐negatives (patients incorrectly classified as not having lymph node TB)
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
True‐negatives (patients without lymph node TB)
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
False‐positives (patients incorrectly classified as having lymph node TB)
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Xpert MTB/RIF result
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Xpert Ultra result
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
True‐positives (participants with TB meningitis)
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
True‐positives (patients correctly classified as rifampicin resistant)
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
False‐negatives (patients incorrectly classified as rifampicin susceptible)
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
True‐negatives (patients correctly classified as rifampicin susceptible)
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
False‐positives (patients incorrectly classified as rifampicin resistant)
1 finding from 1 review