Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,752 questions · 6,648 findings · 688 reviews

No studies found 1,125 · 16.9%GRADE not reported 670 · 10.1%Very low 1,796 · 27%Low 1,685 · 25.3%Moderate 1,075 · 16.2%High 297 · 4.5%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

Microwave coagulation vs radiofrequency ablation

Recurrence of liver metastases local progression · people with liver metastases

It is very uncertain whether microwave coagulation changes recurrence of liver metastases local progression compared with radiofrequency ablation (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Microwave coagulation vs radiofrequency ablation

Recurrence of liver metastases distant recurrence · people with liver metastases

It is very uncertain whether microwave coagulation changes recurrence of liver metastases distant recurrence compared with radiofrequency ablation (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Dimethylfumarate (Direct evidence; 2 RCTs; 2307 participants) · Patients with RRMS Interventions: alemtuzumab, azathriopine, cladribine, dimethylfumarate, fingolimod, glatiramer acetate,…

The intervention probably leads to lower dimethylfumarate (Direct evidence; 2 RCTs; 2307 participants) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Dimethylfumarate (Direct evidence; 2 RCTs; 2307 participants) · Patients with RRMS Interventions: Alemtuzumab, azathioprine, cladribine, dimethylfumarate, fingolimod, glatiramer acetate,…

The intervention may leads to lower dimethylfumarate (Direct evidence; 2 RCTs; 2307 participants) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Dimethylfumarate (Direct evidence; 2 RCTs; 2300 participants) · Patients with RRMS Interventions: Alemtuzumab, azathioprine, cladribine, daclizumab, dimethylfumarate, fingolimod, glatiramer acetate,…

The intervention showed no clear difference in dimethylfumarate (Direct evidence; 2 RCTs; 2300 participants) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Dimethylfumarate (Direct evidence; 2 RCTs; 2300 participants) · Patients with RRMS Interventions: Alemtuzumab, cladribine, daclizumab, dimethylfumarate, fingolimod, glatiramer acetate, interferon…

The intervention showed no clear difference in dimethylfumarate (Direct evidence; 2 RCTs; 2300 participants) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Lifestyle interventions vs placebo or usual care

Cardiovascular and metabolic event frequency (12 months) (Number of strokes, myocardial infarctions and hospitalisations for heart failure) · weight reduction in obesity to improve survival in women with endometrial cancer

Summary of findings table ‐ Lifestyle intervention showed no clear difference in cardiovascular and metabolic event frequency (6 months) compared with usual care compared to placebo (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Caffeine vs other methylxanthines

Side effects (tachycardia, agitation, or feed intolerance) leading to a reduction in dose or withholding of methylxanthines№ of participants: 30(1 RCT) · preterm infants

It is very uncertain whether caffeine changes side effects (tachycardia, agitation, or feed intolerance) leading… compared with other methylxanthines (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Adults: formoterol/ICS vs salmeterol/ICS

All‐cause mortality ‐ formoterol and budesonide vs salmeterol and fluticasone · adults, chronic asthma: all‐cause mortality

Adults: formoterol/ICS showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality ‐ formoterol/budesonide vs salmeterol/fluticasone compared with salmeterol/ICS (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Adults: formoterol/ICS vs salmeterol/ICS

All‐cause non‐fatal serious adverse events ‐ formoterol/budesonide vs salmeterol/budesonide · adults, chronic asthma: all‐cause mortality

Adults: formoterol/ICS showed no clear difference in all‐cause non‐fatal serious adverse events ‐ formoterol/budesonide… compared with salmeterol/ICS (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Adults: formoterol/ICS vs salmeterol/ICS

Asthma‐related non‐fatal serious adverse events · adults, chronic asthma: all‐cause mortality

Adults: formoterol/ICS showed no clear difference in asthma‐related non‐fatal serious adverse events ‐… compared with salmeterol/ICS (low certainty).

5 findings from 1 review
Show 2 more findings

Adults: formoterol/ICS vs salmeterol/ICS

All‐cause mortality ‐ formoterol/mometasone vs salmeterol/fluticasone · adults, chronic asthma: all‐cause mortality

Adults: formoterol/ICS showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality ‐ formoterol/mometasone vs salmeterol/fluticasone compared with salmeterol/ICS (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Adults: formoterol/ICS vs salmeterol/ICS

All‐cause mortality ‐ formoterol/fluticasone vs salmeterol/fluticasone · adults, chronic asthma: all‐cause mortality

Adults: formoterol/ICS showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality ‐ formoterol/fluticasone vs salmeterol/fluticasone compared with salmeterol/ICS (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review