Generic quality of life measures · adults with olfactory dysfunction for ≥ 4 weeks following COVID‐19 infection
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Presence of parosmia · adults with olfactory dysfunction for ≥ 4 weeks following COVID‐19 infection
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Other adverse outcomes · adults with olfactory dysfunction for ≥ 4 weeks following COVID‐19 infection
1 finding from 1 review
Recovery of sense of smell (as · adults with olfactory dysfunction for ≥ 4 weeks following COVID‐19 infection
It is very uncertain whether palmitoylethanolamide and luteolin changes recovery of sense of smell (as compared with no intervention (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Disease‐related quality of life · adults with olfactory dysfunction for ≥ 4 weeks following COVID‐19 infection
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Presence of normal olfactory function · people with olfactory dysfunction for less than 4 weeks following COVID‐19 infection
It is very uncertain whether intranasal steroid spray changes presence of normal olfactory function Assessed by participants as a… compared with no intervention/placebo (very low certainty).
2 findings from 1 review
Other adverse effects · people with olfactory dysfunction for less than 4 weeks following COVID‐19 infection
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events · people with olfactory dysfunction for less than 4 weeks following COVID‐19 infection
1 finding from 1 review
Change in sense of smell · people with olfactory dysfunction for less than 4 weeks following COVID‐19 infection
3 findings from 1 review
no estimate extracted
1 study · 77 participants
Very low
no estimate extracted
1 study · 100 participants
Very low
no estimate extracted
1 study · 77 participants
Low
Prevalence of parosmia · people with olfactory dysfunction for less than 4 weeks following COVID‐19 infection
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Change in taste · people with olfactory dysfunction for less than 4 weeks following COVID‐19 infection
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Disease‐related quality of life · people with olfactory dysfunction for less than 4 weeks following COVID‐19 infection
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Reported improvement in the position of the ectopic canine measured from radiographs · Young people aged 9 to 14 years diagnosed with one or both palatally displaced permanent maxillary canines (PDC)
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
Root resorption of adjacent permanent teeth caused by the PDC · Young people aged 9 to 14 years diagnosed with one or both palatally displaced permanent maxillary canines (PDC)
Extraction of the primary (baby) canine (single primary tooth… showed no clear difference in root resorption of adjacent permanent teeth caused by the PDC compared with no extraction (non-intervention control); GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Effect of severity of PDC displacement towards the midline on the proportion of successful eruptions · Young people aged 9 to 14 years diagnosed with one or both palatally displaced permanent maxillary canines (PDC)
1 finding from 1 review
Table 4 (Naoumova 2015): probability of successful eruption depended on displacement severity; sector 2 (mild) 14/19 (74%) erupted vs sector 4 0/10 erupted; data refer to 59 teeth (mITT).
1 study · 59 participants
GRADE not reported
Time taken for the canine to erupt into the mouth · Young people aged 9 to 14 years diagnosed with one or both palatally displaced permanent maxillary canines (PDC)
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
0 studies
No studies found
Incidence of eruption of the PDC into the mouth · Young people aged 9 to 14 years diagnosed with one or both palatally displaced permanent maxillary canines (PDC)
It is very uncertain whether extraction of the primary (baby) canine (single primary tooth… changes incidence of eruption of the PDC into the mouth compared with no extraction (non-intervention control) (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Patient-reported outcomes (pain, discomfort and analgesic use) · Young people aged 9 to 14 years diagnosed with one or both palatally displaced permanent maxillary canines (PDC)
1 finding from 1 review
Self-reported VAS pain (Naoumova 2012): pain and discomfort from extraction of the primary canine were low both during and after the procedure and mostly absent at one week; 35% of boys and 50% of girls took one dose…
1 study · 44 participants
GRADE not reported
Any other adverse effects of the interventions, such as gingival disease and demineralisation · Young people aged 9 to 14 years diagnosed with one or both palatally displaced permanent maxillary canines (PDC)
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
Confidence and self‐efficacy · parents and carers of children with complex needs
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
20 participants
GRADE not reported