Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

4,760 questions · 8,065 findings · 1,036 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 1,686 · 20.9%GRADE not reported 675 · 8.4%Very low 1,953 · 24.2%Low 2,048 · 25.4%Moderate 1,296 · 16.1%High 407 · 5%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

High protein vs low protein intake (restricted to studies meeting all a priori inclusion criteria)

Rate of weight gain (g/kg/day) · formula‐fed low birth weight infants

1 finding from 1 review

Higher versus lower protein intake in formula‐fed low birth weight infants 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
5 studies · 114 participants
Low

Very high protein vs low protein intake (restricted to studies meeting all a priori inclusion criteria)

Necrotising enterocolitis · formula‐fed low birth weight infants

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Higher versus lower protein intake in formula‐fed low birth weight infants 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

High protein vs low protein intake (restricted to studies meeting all a priori inclusion criteria)

Linear growth (cm/week) · formula‐fed low birth weight infants

1 finding from 1 review

Higher versus lower protein intake in formula‐fed low birth weight infants 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 48 participants
Low

High protein vs low protein intake (restricted to studies meeting all a priori inclusion criteria)

Growth: head circumference (cm/week) · formula‐fed low birth weight infants

1 finding from 1 review

Higher versus lower protein intake in formula‐fed low birth weight infants 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 18 participants
Very low

High protein vs low protein intake (restricted to studies meeting all a priori inclusion criteria)

IQ score and Bayley score at 18 months or later · formula‐fed low birth weight infants

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Higher versus lower protein intake in formula‐fed low birth weight infants 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

High protein vs low protein intake (restricted to studies meeting all a priori inclusion criteria)

Necrotising enterocolitis · formula‐fed low birth weight infants

1 finding from 1 review

Higher versus lower protein intake in formula‐fed low birth weight infants 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 46 participants
Low

Very high protein vs low protein intake (restricted to studies meeting all a priori inclusion criteria)

Weight gain · formula‐fed low birth weight infants

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Higher versus lower protein intake in formula‐fed low birth weight infants 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Very high protein vs low protein intake (restricted to studies meeting all a priori inclusion criteria)

Linear growth (cm/week) · formula‐fed low birth weight infants

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Higher versus lower protein intake in formula‐fed low birth weight infants 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Very high protein vs low protein intake (restricted to studies meeting all a priori inclusion criteria)

Growth: head circumference (cm/week) · formula‐fed low birth weight infants

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Higher versus lower protein intake in formula‐fed low birth weight infants 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Very high protein vs low protein intake (restricted to studies meeting all a priori inclusion criteria)

IQ score and Bayley score at 18 months or later · formula‐fed low birth weight infants

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Higher versus lower protein intake in formula‐fed low birth weight infants 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Unfractionated heparin vs low molecular weight heparin

Total VTE · people undergoing major amputation of the lower extremity

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Primary prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in people undergoing major amputation of the lower extremity 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Unfractionated heparin vs low molecular weight heparin

DVT (symptomatic, asymptomatic, non‐fatal) · people undergoing major amputation of the lower extremity

It is very uncertain whether unfractionated heparin changes DVT (symptomatic, asymptomatic, non‐fatal) (5 to 8 days after surgery) compared with low molecular weight heparin (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Primary prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in people undergoing major amputation of the lower extremity 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 1.23 [0.28, 5.35]
1 study · 75 participants
Very low

Unfractionated heparin vs low molecular weight heparin

PE (symptomatic, asymptomatic, non‐fatal) · people undergoing major amputation of the lower extremity

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Primary prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in people undergoing major amputation of the lower extremity 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Unfractionated heparin vs low molecular weight heparin

All cause mortality · people undergoing major amputation of the lower extremity

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Primary prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in people undergoing major amputation of the lower extremity 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Unfractionated heparin vs low molecular weight heparin

Adverse events · people undergoing major amputation of the lower extremity

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Primary prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in people undergoing major amputation of the lower extremity 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Unfractionated heparin vs low molecular weight heparin

Bleeding (timing not specified) · people undergoing major amputation of the lower extremity

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Primary prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in people undergoing major amputation of the lower extremity 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Non‐specialist‐led vs specialist‐led follow‐up after primary cancer treatment

Overall survival · adult cancer survivors from the following cancer sites: breast, colon, colorectal, endometrial, ovarian, cervical, melanoma and oesophageal

It is very uncertain whether non‐specialist‐led changes overall survival compared with specialist‐led follow‐up after primary cancer treatment (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Follow‐up strategies following completion of primary cancer treatment in adult cancer survivors 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
HR 1.21 [0.68, 2.15]
603 participants
Very low

Less intensive vs more intensive follow‐up after primary cancer treatment

Anxiety · adult cancer survivors from the following cancer sites: breast, colorectal, head‐and‐neck, Hodgkin lymphoma, melanoma, non‐small cell lung…

1 finding from 1 review

Follow‐up strategies following completion of primary cancer treatment in adult cancer survivors 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
180 participants
Very low

Less intensive vs more intensive follow‐up after primary cancer treatment

Depression · adult cancer survivors from the following cancer sites: breast, colorectal, head‐and‐neck, Hodgkin lymphoma, melanoma, non‐small cell lung…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Follow‐up strategies following completion of primary cancer treatment in adult cancer survivors 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Less intensive vs more intensive follow‐up after primary cancer treatment

Costs · adult cancer survivors from the following cancer sites: breast, colorectal, head‐and‐neck, Hodgkin lymphoma, melanoma, non‐small cell lung…

1 finding from 1 review

Follow‐up strategies following completion of primary cancer treatment in adult cancer survivors 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1412 participants
Very low