Highest vs lowest selenium exposure
Highest showed no clear difference in colorectal cancer risk No. of participants: 19,009 (2 RCTs) compared with lowest selenium exposure (high certainty).
- RR 0.99 [0.69, 1.43]Studies not reportedHigh
Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.
Highest showed no clear difference in colorectal cancer risk No. of participants: 19,009 (2 RCTs) compared with lowest selenium exposure (high certainty).
Highest showed no clear difference in non‐melanoma skin cancer risk No. of participants: 2027 (2 RCTs) compared with lowest selenium exposure (moderate certainty).
Highest showed no clear difference in lung cancer risk No. of participants: 19,009 (2 RCTs) compared with lowest selenium exposure (high certainty).
Highest showed no clear difference in breast cancer risk No. of participants: 802 (1 RCT) compared with lowest selenium exposure (moderate certainty).
Highest showed no clear difference in bladder cancer risk No. of participants: 19,009 (2 RCTs) compared with lowest selenium exposure (high certainty).
Highest showed no clear difference in prostate cancer risk No. of participants: 18,942 (4 RCTs) compared with lowest selenium exposure (high certainty).
The intervention showed no clear difference in caesarean section ‐ low risk group (high certainty).
The intervention showed no clear difference in activities of daily living (ADL) (Barthel Index score 0 to 20; lower… (low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes subjective Health Status score (Assessment of Quality of Life Score… (very low certainty).
Upright position probably leads to lower low cord pH compared with recumbent position (moderate certainty).
Arm support combined with alternative mouse showed no clear difference in incidence of upper body disorders (neck, shoulder, and upper… compared with conventional mouse alone (moderate certainty).
Alternative mouse alone showed no clear difference in incidence of upper body disorder (neck, shoulder and upper… compared with conventional mouse alone (moderate certainty).
Alternative mouse alone showed no clear difference in incidence of neck or shoulderdisorder Questionnaire followed by… compared with conventional mouse alone (low certainty).
Alternative mouse alone showed no clear difference in incidence of right upper extremity disorder Questionnaire followed… compared with conventional mouse alone (moderate certainty).
Arm support combined with alternative mouse probably leads to lower incidence of neck or shoulder disorder Questionnaire followed by… compared with conventional mouse alone (moderate certainty).
Arm support combined with alternative mouse showed no clear difference in incidence of right upper extremity disorder Questionnaire followed… compared with conventional mouse alone (moderate certainty).
Arm support with conventional mouse showed no clear difference in incidence of upper body disorders Questionnaire followed by medical… compared with conventional mouse alone (low certainty).
Arm support with conventional mouse showed no clear difference in incidence of neck or shoulder disorder Questionnaire followed by… compared with conventional mouse alone (low certainty).
Arm support with conventional mouse showed no clear difference in incidence of right upper extremity disorders Questionnaire followed… compared with conventional mouse alone (moderate certainty).