Mean GI symptom scores (IBDQ‐B) · People undergoing pelvic radiotherapy for urological, gynaecological or colorectal cancer
1 finding from 1 review
QoL · People undergoing pelvic radiotherapy for urological, gynaecological or colorectal cancer
Summary of findings: Diet interventions showed no clear difference in QOL scores (IBDQ) (higher scores better) compared with usual on‐treatment diet (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
High‐fibre diet · People undergoing pelvic radiotherapy for urological, gynaecological or colorectal cancer
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Mean GI symptom scores (Vaizey scale) (higher scores better) · People undergoing pelvic radiotherapy for urological, gynaecological or colorectal cancer
Summary of findings: Diet interventions showed no clear difference in mean GI symptom scores (Vaizey scale) (higher scores better) compared with usual on‐treatment diet (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Moderate to severe exacerbations: high‐risk population · chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with predicted FEV1 of less than 80%
LABA/LAMA showed no clear difference in moderate to severe exacerbations: high‐risk population compared with LABA/ICS (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Pneumonia: high‐risk population · chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with predicted FEV1 of less than 80%
LABA/LAMA showed no clear difference in pneumonia: high‐risk population compared with LAMA (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Moderate to severe exacerbations: high‐risk population · chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with predicted FEV1 of less than 80%
1 finding from 1 review
Severe exacerbations: high‐risk population · chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with predicted FEV1 of less than 80%
1 finding from 1 review
Pneumonia: high‐risk population · chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with predicted FEV1 of less than 80%
1 finding from 1 review
Moderate to severe exacerbations: high‐risk population · chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with predicted FEV1 of less than 80%
LABA/ICS showed no clear difference in moderate to severe exacerbations: high‐risk population compared with LAMA (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Severe exacerbations: high‐risk population · chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with predicted FEV1 of less than 80%
LABA/ICS showed no clear difference in severe exacerbations: high‐risk population compared with LAMA (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Pneumonia: high‐risk population · chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with predicted FEV1 of less than 80%
LABA/ICS probably leads to higher pneumonia: high‐risk population compared with LAMA (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Moderate to severe exacerbations: high‐risk population · chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with predicted FEV1 of less than 80%
LABA/ICS leads to lower moderate to severe exacerbations: high‐risk population compared with LABA (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Severe exacerbations: high‐risk population · chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with predicted FEV1 of less than 80%
LABA/ICS showed no clear difference in severe exacerbations: high‐risk population compared with LABA (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Pneumonia: high‐risk population · chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with predicted FEV1 of less than 80%
LABA/ICS probably leads to higher pneumonia: high‐risk population compared with LABA (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Severe exacerbations: high‐risk population · chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with predicted FEV1 of less than 80%
LABA/LAMA showed no clear difference in severe exacerbations: high‐risk population compared with LABA/ICS (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Moderate to severe exacerbations: high‐risk population · chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with predicted FEV1 of less than 80%
LAMA leads to lower moderate to severe exacerbations: high‐risk population compared with LABA (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Severe exacerbations: high‐risk population · chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with predicted FEV1 of less than 80%
LAMA showed no clear difference in severe exacerbations: high‐risk population compared with LABA (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Pneumonia: high‐risk population · chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with predicted FEV1 of less than 80%
LAMA showed no clear difference in pneumonia: high‐risk population compared with LABA (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Pneumonia: high‐risk population · chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with predicted FEV1 of less than 80%
LABA/LAMA probably leads to lower pneumonia: high‐risk population compared with LABA/ICS (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review