What do systematic reviews say?

Psychological therapy vs any comparator

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Psychological therapies for anxiety and depression in children and adolescents with long‐term physical conditions 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

EHealth interventions vs any comparator

• E‐Health interventions for anxiety and depression in children and adolescents with long‐term physical conditions 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  5 studies · 441 participants
  Very low

EHealth interventions vs any comparator

• E‐Health interventions for anxiety and depression in children and adolescents with long‐term physical conditions 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 324 participants
  Very low

EHealth interventions vs any comparator

• E‐Health interventions for anxiety and depression in children and adolescents with long‐term physical conditions 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 304 participants
  Very low

EHealth interventions vs any comparator

• E‐Health interventions for anxiety and depression in children and adolescents with long‐term physical conditions 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 34 participants
  Very low

EHealth interventions vs any comparator

• E‐Health interventions for anxiety and depression in children and adolescents with long‐term physical conditions 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  3 studies · 368 participants
  Very low

Low molecular weight heparin vs vitamin K antagonist (VKA)

LMWH showed no clear difference in incidence of recurrent VTE (treatment duration 3 months) compared with VKA (moderate certainty).

• Vitamin K antagonists versus low‐molecular‐weight heparin for the long term treatment of symptomatic venous… 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  Peto OR 0.83 [0.6, 1.15]
  16 studies · 3299 participants
  Moderate

Low molecular weight heparin vs vitamin K antagonist (VKA)

LMWH may leads to lower incidence of major bleeding (treatment duration 3 months) compared with VKA (low certainty).

• Vitamin K antagonists versus low‐molecular‐weight heparin for the long term treatment of symptomatic venous… 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  Peto OR 0.51 [0.32, 0.8]
  16 studies · 3299 participants
  Low

Low molecular weight heparin vs vitamin K antagonist (VKA)

LMWH showed no clear difference in mortality (treatment duration 3 months) compared with VKA (moderate certainty).

• Vitamin K antagonists versus low‐molecular‐weight heparin for the long term treatment of symptomatic venous… 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  Peto OR 1.08 [0.75, 1.56]
  16 studies · 3299 participants
  Moderate

Any washout vs no washout

• Washout policies in long‐term indwelling urinary catheterisation in adults 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 53 participants
  Low

One washout solution vs another

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Washout policies in long‐term indwelling urinary catheterisation in adults 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

One washout solution vs another

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Washout policies in long‐term indwelling urinary catheterisation in adults 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

One washout solution vs another

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Washout policies in long‐term indwelling urinary catheterisation in adults 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

One washout solution vs another

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Washout policies in long‐term indwelling urinary catheterisation in adults 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

One washout solution vs another

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Washout policies in long‐term indwelling urinary catheterisation in adults 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Any washout vs no washout

• Washout policies in long‐term indwelling urinary catheterisation in adults 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 23 participants
  Very low

Any washout vs no washout

• Washout policies in long‐term indwelling urinary catheterisation in adults 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 23 participants
  Very low

Any washout vs no washout

It is very uncertain whether any washout changes number of catheters used (Number of participants needing catheter… compared with no washout (very low certainty).

• Washout policies in long‐term indwelling urinary catheterisation in adults 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.67 [0.34, 1.31]
  1 study · 40 participants
  Very low

Any washout vs no washout

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Washout policies in long‐term indwelling urinary catheterisation in adults 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Any washout vs no washout

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Washout policies in long‐term indwelling urinary catheterisation in adults 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found