Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

3,018 questions · 3,100 findings · 369 reviews · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 774 · 25%GRADE not reported 108 · 3.5%Very low 727 · 23.5%Low 840 · 27.1%Moderate 474 · 15.3%High 177 · 5.7%

Temsirolimus vs IFN‐α (targeted agent versus classic immunotherapy)

Progression‐free survival · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (any cell type)

Temsirolimus may leads to lower progression‐free survival (absolute effect size estimates based on… compared with IFN‐α (targeted agent versus classic immunotherapy) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Temsirolimus vs IFN‐α (targeted agent versus classic immunotherapy)

Overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival rate at 12 months) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (any cell type)

Temsirolimus probably leads to lower overall survival survival (absolute effect size estimates based on… compared with IFN‐α (targeted agent versus classic immunotherapy) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sunitinib vs atezolizumab (targeted therapy versus immunotherapy)

Progression‐free survival · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)

It is very uncertain whether sunitinib changes progression‐free survival (absolute effect size estimates based on… compared with atezolizumab (targeted therapy versus immunotherapy) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sunitinib vs atezolizumab (targeted therapy versus immunotherapy)

Overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival rate at 24 months) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)

It is very uncertain whether sunitinib changes overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival… compared with atezolizumab (targeted therapy versus immunotherapy) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sunitinib vs atezolizumab (targeted therapy versus immunotherapy)

Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)

Sunitinib probably leads to higher serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) compared with atezolizumab (targeted therapy versus immunotherapy) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Bevacizumab + IFN vs IFN (+ placebo) (targeted agent + classic immunotherapy versus classic immunotherapy)

Progression‐free survival · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)

Bevacizumab + IFN probably leads to lower progression‐free survival (absolute effect size estimates based on… compared with IFN (+ placebo) (targeted agent + classic immunotherapy versus… (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pazopanib vs sunitinib (targeted agent versus targeted agent)

Progression‐free survival · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)

Pazopanib showed no clear difference in progression‐free survival (absolute effect size estimates based on… compared with sunitinib (targeted agent versus targeted agent) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Bevacizumab + IFN vs IFN (+ placebo) (targeted agent + classic immunotherapy versus classic immunotherapy)

Overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival rate at 24 months) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)

Bevacizumab + IFN may leads to lower overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival… compared with IFN (+ placebo) (targeted agent + classic immunotherapy versus… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Bevacizumab + IFN vs IFN (+ placebo) (targeted agent + classic immunotherapy versus classic immunotherapy)

Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)

Bevacizumab + IFN probably leads to higher serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) compared with IFN (+ placebo) (targeted agent + classic immunotherapy versus… (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Temsirolimus + IFN‐α vs IFN (+ placebo) (targeted agent + classic immunotherapy versus classic immunotherapy)

Progression‐free survival · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (any cell type)

Temsirolimus + IFN‐α may leads to lower progression‐free survival (absolute effect size estimates based on… compared with IFN‐α (targeted agent + classic immunotherapy versus classic… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Temsirolimus + IFN‐α vs IFN (+ placebo) (targeted agent + classic immunotherapy versus classic immunotherapy)

Overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival rate at 12 months) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (any cell type)

Temsirolimus + IFN‐α showed no clear difference in overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival… compared with IFN‐α (targeted agent + classic immunotherapy versus classic… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Temsirolimus + IFN‐α vs IFN (+ placebo) (targeted agent + classic immunotherapy versus classic immunotherapy)

Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (any cell type)

Temsirolimus + IFN‐α may leads to higher serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) compared with IFN‐α (targeted agent + classic immunotherapy versus classic… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Temsirolimus + bevacizumab vs bevacizumab + IFN‐α (targeted agent + targeted agent versus targeted agent + classic immunotherapy)

Progression‐free survival · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (any cell type)

Temsirolimus + bevacizumab showed no clear difference in progression‐free survival (absolute effect size estimates based on… compared with bevacizumab + IFN‐α (targeted agent + targeted agent versus targeted… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review