Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,667 questions · 21,760 findings · 2,177 reviews

No studies found 4,173 · 19.2%GRADE not reported 2,300 · 10.6%Very low 5,276 · 24.2%Low 5,764 · 26.5%Moderate 3,298 · 15.2%High 949 · 4.4%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

Intratympanic plus systemic corticosteroids (combined therapy) vs systemic corticosteroids alone

Change in hearing threshold determined by PTA Range 0 dB to 140 dB Negative values represent lowering and positive values represent raising of the hearing threshold. A lower hearing threshold represents hearing improvement. Â · sudden sensorineural hearing loss

Intratympanic plus systemic corticosteroids (combined therapy) showed no clear difference in change in hearing threshold determined by PTA Range 0 dB to 140 dB… compared with systemic corticosteroids alone (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intratympanic plus systemic corticosteroids (combined therapy) vs systemic corticosteroids alone

Final hearing threshold determined by PTA (a lower value represents better hearing) · sudden sensorineural hearing loss

It is very uncertain whether intratympanic plus systemic corticosteroids (combined therapy) changes final hearing threshold determined by PTA A lower value represents… compared with systemic corticosteroids alone (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intratympanic corticosteroids vs no treatment or versus placebo

Change in hearing threshold determined by PTA Range 0 dB to 140 dB Negative values represent lowering and positive values represent raising of the hearing threshold. A lower hearing threshold represents hearing improvement. Â · sudden sensorineural hearing loss

Intratympanic corticosteroids showed no clear difference in change in hearing threshold determined by PTA Range 0 dB to 140 dB… compared with no treatment or versus placebo (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intratympanic corticosteroids vs no treatment or versus placebo

Final hearing threshold determined by PTA (a lower value represents better hearing) · sudden sensorineural hearing loss

Intratympanic corticosteroids showed no clear difference in final hearing threshold determined by PTA (a lower value represents… compared with no treatment or versus placebo (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intratympanic corticosteroids vs systemic corticosteroids

Final hearing threshold determined by PTA (a lower value represents better hearing) · sudden sensorineural hearing loss

Intratympanic corticosteroids showed no clear difference in final hearing threshold determined by PTA (a lower value represents… compared with systemic corticosteroids (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Symblepharon Presence of symblepharon · people with severe acute ocular burns

The intervention showed no clear difference in symblepharon Presence of symblepharon (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Symblepharon Presence of symblepharon · people with moderate acute ocular burns

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes symblepharon Presence of symblepharon (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Malaria rapid diagnostic test (mRDT) vs clinical diagnosis

Antimalarial prescribing to microscopy‐ or PCR‐negative people · people with suspected malaria

Malaria rapid diagnostic test (mRDT) probably leads to lower antimalarial prescribing to microscopy‐ or PCR‐negative people compared with clinical diagnosis (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Malaria rapid diagnostic test (mRDT) vs clinical diagnosis

Antibiotic prescribing to microscopy‐ or PCR‐negative people · people with suspected malaria

Malaria rapid diagnostic test (mRDT) probably leads to higher antibiotic prescribing to microscopy‐ or PCR‐negative people compared with clinical diagnosis (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review