Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

2,434 questions · 2,594 findings · 269 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 543 · 20.9%GRADE not reported 191 · 7.4%Very low 676 · 26.1%Low 732 · 28.2%Moderate 399 · 15.4%High 53 · 2%

Acupressure vs usual care

Sense of control in labour ‐ not reported · pain management in labour

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Acupuncture or acupressure for pain management during labour 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Acupressure vs usual care

Satisfaction with childbirth experience ‐ not reported · pain management in labour

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Acupuncture or acupressure for pain management during labour 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Acupressure vs usual care

Use of pharmacological pain relief ‐ not reported · pain management in labour

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Acupuncture or acupressure for pain management during labour 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Acupressure vs usual care

Assisted vaginal birth — not reported · pain management in labour

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Acupuncture or acupressure for pain management during labour 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Acupressure vs usual care

Caesarean section · pain management in labour

Acupressure showed no clear difference in caesarean section compared with usual care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Acupuncture or acupressure for pain management during labour 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.82 [0.54, 1.23]
4 studies · 391 participants
Low

Acupuncture vs usual care

Patient‐reported pain intensity or pain relief (VAS, NRS or categorical scale) · pain management in labour

1 finding from 1 review

Acupuncture or acupressure for pain management during labour 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 495 participants
Very low

Acupuncture vs usual care

Satisfaction with pain relief · pain management in labour

Acupuncture showed no clear difference in satisfaction with pain relief in labour compared with usual care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Acupuncture or acupressure for pain management during labour 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.07 [0.96, 1.2]
2 studies · 343 participants
Low

Advance misoprostol distribution/provision to pregnant women for postpartum self‐administration vs usual care

Severe postpartum haemorrhage · women in the third stage of labour

1 finding from 1 review

Advance misoprostol distribution to pregnant women for preventing and treating postpartum haemorrhage 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 299 participants
GRADE not reported

Advance misoprostol distribution/provision to pregnant women for postpartum self‐administration vs usual care

Serious maternal morbidity · women in the third stage of labour

1 finding from 1 review

Advance misoprostol distribution to pregnant women for preventing and treating postpartum haemorrhage 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 299 participants
Very low

Advance misoprostol distribution/provision to pregnant women for postpartum self‐administration vs usual care

Maternal death · women in the third stage of labour

1 finding from 1 review

Advance misoprostol distribution to pregnant women for preventing and treating postpartum haemorrhage 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 299 participants
Very low

Advance misoprostol distribution/provision to pregnant women for postpartum self‐administration vs usual care

Blood transfusion · women in the third stage of labour

1 finding from 1 review

Advance misoprostol distribution to pregnant women for preventing and treating postpartum haemorrhage 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 299 participants
Very low

Advance misoprostol distribution/provision to pregnant women for postpartum self‐administration vs usual care

Women not using/receiving misoprostol at birth · women in the third stage of labour

It is very uncertain whether advance misoprostol distribution/provision to pregnant women for… changes women not using/receiving misoprostol at birth compared with usual (or standard) care (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Advance misoprostol distribution to pregnant women for preventing and treating postpartum haemorrhage 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.5 [0.13, 1.95]
1 study · 299 participants
Very low

Advance misoprostol distribution/provision to pregnant women for postpartum self‐administration vs usual care

Inappropriate use (or misuse) of misoprostol · women in the third stage of labour

It is very uncertain whether advance misoprostol distribution/provision to pregnant women for… changes inappropriate use (or misuse) of misoprostol compared with usual (or standard) care (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Advance misoprostol distribution to pregnant women for preventing and treating postpartum haemorrhage 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 4.97 [0.24, 102.59]
1 study · 299 participants
Very low

Advance misoprostol distribution/provision to pregnant women for postpartum self‐administration vs usual care

Maternal transfer or referral to a health facility · women in the third stage of labour

It is very uncertain whether advance misoprostol distribution/provision to pregnant women for… changes maternal transfer or referral to a health facility compared with usual (or standard) care (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Advance misoprostol distribution to pregnant women for preventing and treating postpartum haemorrhage 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.66 [0.11, 3.91]
1 study · 299 participants
Very low

Pharmacological interventions vs placebo/usual care or different forms of intervention

Effect on later sexual function · men (aged between 23 and 45) with premature ejaculation within 3 months after stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for sexual dysfunction following stroke 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 114 participants
Very low

Non‐pharmaceutical interventions vs placebo/usual care or different forms of intervention

Secondary outcome: quality of life · people within 3 months after stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for sexual dysfunction following stroke 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 68 participants
Low

Non‐pharmaceutical interventions vs placebo/usual care or different forms of intervention

Psychological well‐being (secondary outcome) Not addressed · people within 3 months after stroke

2 findings from 1 review

Interventions for sexual dysfunction following stroke 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 68 participants
Low
Interventions for sexual dysfunction following stroke 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Non‐pharmaceutical interventions vs placebo/usual care or different forms of intervention

Satisfaction with intervention (secondary outcome) Not addressed · people within 3 months after stroke

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for sexual dysfunction following stroke 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Non‐pharmaceutical interventions vs placebo/usual care or different forms of intervention

Marital/relationship/partner satisfaction (secondary outcome) Not addressed · people within 3 months after stroke

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for sexual dysfunction following stroke 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Non‐pharmaceutical interventions vs placebo/usual care or different forms of intervention

Secondary outcome: all adverse events · people within 3 months after stroke

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for sexual dysfunction following stroke 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found