Intervention not reported
RVX (low dose, 2.5 mg) vs VKA · adults who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and who have an indication for anticoagulation
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
DAB (low dose, 110 mg) vs VKA · adults who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and who have an indication for anticoagulation
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
RVX (low dose, 2.5 mg) vs VKA · adults who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and who have an indication for anticoagulation
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
DAB (low dose, 110 mg) vs VKA · adults who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and who have an indication for anticoagulation
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
RVX (low dose, 2.5 mg) vs VKA · adults who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and who have an indication for anticoagulation
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
DAB (low dose, 110 mg) vs VKA · adults who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and who have an indication for anticoagulation
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
RVX (low dose, 2.5 mg) vs VKA · adults who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and who have an indication for anticoagulation
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
RVX (low dose, 2.5 mg) vs VKA · adults who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and who have an indication for anticoagulation
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
DAB (low dose, 110 mg) vs VKA · adults who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and who have an indication for anticoagulation
1 finding from 1 review
Perceived need for surgery in adulthood · Children and adolescents (aged 16 years or younger) with prominent lower front teeth (Class III malocclusion)
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
Overjet · Children and adolescents (aged 16 years or younger) with prominent lower front teeth (Class III malocclusion)
Bone-anchored intermaxillary traction (BAIMT) led to higher overjet compared with removable mandibular retractor (RMR); GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Wits appraisal · Children and adolescents (aged 16 years or younger) with prominent lower front teeth (Class III malocclusion)
Orthodontic removable traction appliance (ORTA) led to higher wits appraisal compared with untreated control (no treatment); GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Wits appraisal · Children and adolescents (aged 16 years or younger) with prominent lower front teeth (Class III malocclusion)
Facemask (with frame internal fixation) showed no clear difference in wits appraisal compared with frankel III functional appliance; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
ANB · Children and adolescents (aged 16 years or younger) with prominent lower front teeth (Class III malocclusion)
1 finding from 1 review
Arun 1994 (n=60): ANB data not usable (no SDs); Mann-Whitney P<0.001 benefit for mandibular headgear. Effect ~0.5 degrees, probably not clinically significant.
1 study · 60 participants
GRADE not reported
ANB · Children and adolescents (aged 16 years or younger) with prominent lower front teeth (Class III malocclusion)
Reverse Twin Block with lip pads and rapid maxillary expander (RME) led to higher ANB compared with untreated control (no treatment); GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
ANB · Children and adolescents (aged 16 years or younger) with prominent lower front teeth (Class III malocclusion)
Reverse Forsus led to higher ANB compared with untreated control (no treatment); GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Overjet · Children and adolescents (aged 16 years or younger) with prominent lower front teeth (Class III malocclusion)
Non-surgical orthodontic treatment (any: facemask, chin cup, tandem… probably leads to higher overjet compared with no treatment (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Wits appraisal · Children and adolescents (aged 16 years or younger) with prominent lower front teeth (Class III malocclusion)
Facemask led to higher wits appraisal compared with untreated control (no treatment); GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Overjet · Children and adolescents (aged 16 years or younger) with prominent lower front teeth (Class III malocclusion)
Surgically-anchored orthodontic treatment (miniplates) may leads to higher overjet compared with untreated control (no treatment) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Overjet · Children and adolescents (aged 16 years or younger) with prominent lower front teeth (Class III malocclusion)
Facemask led to higher overjet compared with untreated control (no treatment); GRADE not reported.
3 findings from 1 review
MD 5.04 [4.29, 5.80]
2 studies · 92 participants
GRADE not reported
MD 1.30 [-0.16, 2.76]
1 study · 65 participants
Low
MD 2.50 [1.21, 3.79]
1 study · 63 participants
Moderate