Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

1,886 questions in 74 reviews · Skin

current versions
No studies 542 · 28.7%Ungraded 130 · 6.9%Very low 326 · 17.3%Low 434 · 23%Moderate 348 · 18.5%High 106 · 5.6%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Summary of findings table ‐ NB‐UVB vs placebo
Physician‐assessed changes in clinical signs · atopic eczema
Phototherapy for atopic eczema (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 41 participantsLow
Summary of findings table ‐ NB‐UVB vs UVA1
Safety: withdrawal due to adverse events · atopic eczema
Phototherapy for atopic eczema (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 13 participantsVery low
Summary of findings table ‐ NB‐UVB vs PUVA
Physician‐assessed changes in clinical signs · atopic eczema
Phototherapy for atopic eczema (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 20 participantsVery low
Summary of findings table ‐ NB‐UVB vs PUVA
Patient‐reported changes in symptoms ‐ not measured · atopic eczema
Phototherapy for atopic eczema (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings table ‐ NB‐UVB vs PUVA
Investigator Global Assessment · atopic eczema
Phototherapy for atopic eczema (2021) · Cochrane
OR 1 [0.13, 7.89]1 study · 20 participantsVery low
Summary of findings table ‐ NB‐UVB vs PUVA
Health‐related quality of life ‐ not measured · atopic eczema
Phototherapy for atopic eczema (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings table ‐ NB‐UVB vs PUVA
Safety: withdrawal due to adverse events · atopic eczema
Phototherapy for atopic eczema (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 20 participantsVery low
Summary of findings table ‐ UVA1 vs PUVA
Physician‐assessed changes in clinical signs · atopic eczema
Phototherapy for atopic eczema (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 40 participantsVery low
Summary of findings table ‐ UVA1 vs PUVA
Patient‐reported changes in symptoms ‐ not measured · atopic eczema
Phototherapy for atopic eczema (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings table ‐ UVA1 vs PUVA
Investigator Global Assessment ‐ not measured · atopic eczema
Phototherapy for atopic eczema (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings table ‐ UVA1 vs PUVA
Health‐related quality of life ‐ not measured · atopic eczema
Phototherapy for atopic eczema (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings table ‐ NB‐UVB vs placebo
Patient‐reported changes in symptoms · atopic eczema
Phototherapy for atopic eczema (2021) · Cochrane
RR 1.72 [1.1, 2.69]1 study · 40 participantsLow
Summary of findings table ‐ UVA1 vs PUVA
Safety: withdrawals due to adverse events ‐ not measured · atopic eczema
Phototherapy for atopic eczema (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings table ‐ NB‐UVB vs placebo
Investigator Global Assessment (short‐term) · atopic eczema
Phototherapy for atopic eczema (2021) · Cochrane
RR 2.81 [1.1, 7.17]1 study · 41 participantsLow
Summary of findings table ‐ NB‐UVB vs placebo
Health‐related quality of life ‐ not measured · atopic eczema
Phototherapy for atopic eczema (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings table ‐ NB‐UVB vs placebo
Safety: withdrawals due to adverse events (short‐term) · atopic eczema
Phototherapy for atopic eczema (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 89 participantsLow
Summary of findings table ‐ NB‐UVB vs UVA1
Physician‐assessed changes in clinical signs (short‐term) · atopic eczema
Phototherapy for atopic eczema (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 46 participantsVery low
Summary of findings table ‐ NB‐UVB vs UVA1
Patient‐reported changes in symptoms · atopic eczema
Phototherapy for atopic eczema (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 46 participantsVery low
Summary of findings table ‐ NB‐UVB vs UVA1
Investigator Global Assessment ‐ not measured · atopic eczema
Phototherapy for atopic eczema (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings table ‐ NB‐UVB vs UVA1
Health‐related quality of life · atopic eczema
Phototherapy for atopic eczema (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 46 participantsVery low
Mohs micrographic surgery vs surgical excision
Recurrence at 3 years · adults with basal cell carcinoma of the skin
Interventions for basal cell carcinoma of the skin (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.64 [0.16, 2.64]1 study · 331 participantsLow
Imiquimod vs surgical excision
Early treatment failure · adults with basal cell carcinoma of the skin
Interventions for basal cell carcinoma of the skin (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Radiotherapy vs surgical excision (with or without frozen section margin control)
Recurrence at 3 years · adults with basal cell carcinoma of the skin
Interventions for basal cell carcinoma of the skin (2020) · Cochrane
RR 19.11 [1.12, 325.78]1 study · 347 participantsLow
Radiotherapy vs surgical excision (with or without frozen section margin control)
Recurrence at 4 years · adults with basal cell carcinoma of the skin
Interventions for basal cell carcinoma of the skin (2020) · Cochrane
RR 11.06 [1.44, 84.77]1 study · 347 participantsLow
Radiotherapy vs surgical excision (with or without frozen section margin control)
Cosmetic outcome (good/excellent) · adults with basal cell carcinoma of the skin
Interventions for basal cell carcinoma of the skin (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.76 [0.63, 0.91]1 study · 347 participantsModerate
Radiotherapy vs surgical excision (with or without frozen section margin control)
Pain · adults with basal cell carcinoma of the skin
Interventions for basal cell carcinoma of the skin (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Radiotherapy vs surgical excision (with or without frozen section margin control)
Early treatment failure · adults with basal cell carcinoma of the skin
Interventions for basal cell carcinoma of the skin (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
MAL‐PDT vs surgical excision
Recurrence at 3 years · adults with basal cell carcinoma of the skin
Interventions for basal cell carcinoma of the skin (2020) · Cochrane
RR 26.47 [1.63, 429.92]1 study · 68 participantsLow
MAL‐PDT vs surgical excision
Cosmetic outcome (excellent/good) · adults with basal cell carcinoma of the skin
Interventions for basal cell carcinoma of the skin (2020) · Cochrane
RR 1.18 [1.09, 1.27]2 studies · 309 participantsModerate
MAL‐PDT vs surgical excision
Pain · adults with basal cell carcinoma of the skin
Interventions for basal cell carcinoma of the skin (2020) · Cochrane
RR 2.2 [0.6, 8.03]1 study · 101 participantsLow
MAL‐PDT vs surgical excision
Early treatment failure · adults with basal cell carcinoma of the skin
Interventions for basal cell carcinoma of the skin (2020) · Cochrane
RR 6.66 [1.22, 36.41]2 studies · 173 participantsModerate
Mohs micrographic surgery vs surgical excision
Recurrence at 5 years · adults with basal cell carcinoma of the skin
Interventions for basal cell carcinoma of the skin (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.61 [0.18, 2.04]1 study · 259 participantsLow
Imiquimod cream vs MAL‐PDT
Recurrence at 3 years · adults with basal cell carcinoma of the skin
Interventions for basal cell carcinoma of the skin (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.44 [0.32, 0.62]1 study · 277 participantsModerate
Imiquimod cream vs MAL‐PDT
Recurrence at 5 years · adults with basal cell carcinoma of the skin
Interventions for basal cell carcinoma of the skin (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.42 [0.31, 0.57]1 study · 228 participantsModerate
Imiquimod cream vs MAL‐PDT
Cosmetic outcome (excellent/good) · adults with basal cell carcinoma of the skin
Interventions for basal cell carcinoma of the skin (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.98 [0.84, 1.16]1 study · 370 participantsModerate
Imiquimod cream vs MAL‐PDT
Pain (moderate/severe) · adults with basal cell carcinoma of the skin
Interventions for basal cell carcinoma of the skin (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.6 [0.41, 0.87]1 study · 371 participantsModerate
Imiquimod cream vs MAL‐PDT
Early treatment failure · adults with basal cell carcinoma of the skin
Interventions for basal cell carcinoma of the skin (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.64 [0.37, 1.09]1 study · 385 participantsModerate
Mohs micrographic surgery vs surgical excision
Cosmetic outcome · adults with basal cell carcinoma of the skin
Interventions for basal cell carcinoma of the skin (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 1 participantsLow
Mohs micrographic surgery vs surgical excision
Pain · adults with basal cell carcinoma of the skin
Interventions for basal cell carcinoma of the skin (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Mohs micrographic surgery vs surgical excision
Early treatment failure · adults with basal cell carcinoma of the skin
Interventions for basal cell carcinoma of the skin (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Imiquimod vs surgical excision
Recurrence at 3 years · adults with basal cell carcinoma of the skin
Interventions for basal cell carcinoma of the skin (2020) · Cochrane
RR 10.3 [3.22, 32.94]1 study · 401 participantsModerate
Imiquimod vs surgical excision
Recurrence at 5 years · adults with basal cell carcinoma of the skin
Interventions for basal cell carcinoma of the skin (2020) · Cochrane
RR 7.73 [2.81, 21.3]1 study · 383 participantsModerate
Imiquimod vs surgical excision
Cosmetic outcome (good/excellent) · adults with basal cell carcinoma of the skin
Interventions for basal cell carcinoma of the skin (2020) · Cochrane
RR 1.7 [1.35, 2.15]1 study · 344 participantsLow
Imiquimod vs surgical excision
Pain (moderate/severe) · adults with basal cell carcinoma of the skin
Interventions for basal cell carcinoma of the skin (2020) · Cochrane
RR 1.36 [0.98, 1.88]1 study · 443 participantsLow
Meglumine antimoniate (IMMA) (20 mg/kg/d for 20 days) vs placebo (3 tablets/4 times a day
Complete cure, at least 3 months after the end of treatment · People with American cutaneous and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis
Interventions for American cutaneous and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis (2020) · Cochrane
RR 4.23 [0.84, 21.38]2 studies · 157 participantsModerate
Azithromycin (500 mg 20 ‐ 28 days) vs meglumine antimoniate (15 ‐ 20 mg/kg/d
Complete cure, at least 3 months after the end of treatment · People with American cutaneous and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis
Interventions for American cutaneous and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.51 [0.34, 0.76]2 studies · 93 participantsModerate
Azithromycin (500 mg 20 ‐ 28 days) vs meglumine antimoniate (15 ‐ 20 mg/kg/d
Adverse effects · People with American cutaneous and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis
Interventions for American cutaneous and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 45 participantsModerate
Azithromycin (500 mg 20 ‐ 28 days) vs meglumine antimoniate (15 ‐ 20 mg/kg/d
Recurrence ‐ not measured · People with American cutaneous and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis
Interventions for American cutaneous and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Topical imiquimod 5% (3 times/week) + meglumine antimoniate (IVMA) (20 mg/kg/d for 20 days) vs placebo + IVMA
Complete cure, at least 3 months after the end of treatment · People with American cutaneous leishmaniasis
Interventions for American cutaneous and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis (2020) · Cochrane
RR 1.3 [0.95, 1.8]1 study · 80 participantsModerate
Topical imiquimod 5% (3 times/week) + meglumine antimoniate (IVMA) (20 mg/kg/d for 20 days) vs placebo + IVMA
Adverse effects (number of participants who had the event) · People with American cutaneous leishmaniasis
Interventions for American cutaneous and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 80 participantsHigh