Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

303 questions · 322 findings · 45 reviews

No studies found 31 · 9.6%GRADE not reported 22 · 6.8%Very low 99 · 30.7%Low 95 · 29.5%Moderate 68 · 21.1%High 7 · 2.2%

Wax (fluid wax), two stage-two step selective pressure final impression vs Polysulfide rubber (elastomer)

Number of border adjustments and sore spots after insertion of denture · Completely edentulous people

It is very uncertain whether wax (fluid wax), two stage-two step selective pressure final… changes number of border adjustments and sore spots after insertion of denture compared with polysulfide rubber (elastomer) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Selective pressure final-impression technique (two stage-two step, silicone elastomer) vs Traditional technique (redistributing pressure) and control technique (relatively mucostatic standard procedure)

Participant preference for dentures · Completely edentulous people
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention vs control

Selective bowel decontamination versus inactive control · people undergoing liver transplantation

It is very uncertain whether intervention changes selective bowel decontamination versus inactive control compared with control (very low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Intervention vs control

Selective bowel decontamination versus prebiotics with probiotics · people undergoing liver transplantation
2 findings from 1 review

Intervention vs control

Selective bowel decontamination versus prebiotics · people undergoing liver transplantation
2 findings from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Utilisation of research (Thailand) (for six obstetric practices: social support during labour, magnesium sulphate for eclampsia, corticosteroids to women with preterm birth, selective episiotomy, antibiotic use at caesarean section and vacuum extr... · Healthcare decision makers, health system managers or policy makers
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Utilisation of research (Mexico) (for six obstetric practices: social support during labour, magnesium sulphate for eclampsia, corticosteroids to women with preterm birth, selective episiotomy, antibiotic use at caesarean section and vacuum extrac... · Healthcare decision makers, health system managers or policy makers
1 finding from 1 review

Carvedilol vs beta‐blocker

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding · adults with cirrhosis and gastroesophageal varices

It is very uncertain whether carvedilol changes upper gastrointestinal bleeding compared with traditional, non‐selective beta‐blockers (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Carvedilol vs beta‐blocker

Non‐serious adverse events · adults with cirrhosis and gastroesophageal varices

It is very uncertain whether carvedilol changes non‐serious adverse events compared with traditional, non‐selective beta‐blockers (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Carvedilol vs beta‐blocker

Haemodynamic treatment failure · adults with cirrhosis and gastroesophageal varices

It is very uncertain whether carvedilol changes haemodynamic treatment failure compared with traditional, non‐selective beta‐blockers (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Routine invasive strategies vs selective invasive strategies (conservative)

Death · participants with UA/NSTEMI in the stent era

Routine invasive strategies showed no clear difference in death compared with selective invasive strategies (conservative) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Routine invasive strategies vs selective invasive strategies (conservative)

Myocardial infarction · participants with UA/NSTEMI in the stent era

Routine invasive strategies showed no clear difference in myocardial infarction compared with selective invasive strategies (conservative) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Routine invasive strategies vs selective invasive strategies (conservative)

Fatal or nonfatal myocardial infarction · participants with UA/NSTEMI in the stent era

Routine invasive strategies showed no clear difference in death or non‐fatal Myocardial infarction compared with selective invasive strategies (conservative) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Routine invasive strategies vs selective invasive strategies (conservative)

Refractory angina · participants with UA/NSTEMI in the stent era

Routine invasive strategies probably leads to lower refractory angina compared with selective invasive strategies (conservative) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review