Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

564 questions · 589 findings · 155 reviews · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 114 · 19.4%GRADE not reported 15 · 2.5%Very low 179 · 30.4%Low 141 · 23.9%Moderate 110 · 18.7%High 30 · 5.1%

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors vs atypical agent

Improvement in depression at 6‐12 weeks: HAM‐D score (dichotomized) · adults living with HIV and depression

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) showed no clear difference in improvement in depression at 6‐12 weeks: HAM‐D score (dichotomized) compared with atypical agent (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors vs atypical agent

Improvement in depression at 6‐12 weeks: CGI‐I (score of 1 or 2) · adults living with HIV and depression

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) showed no clear difference in improvement in depression at 6‐12 weeks: CGI‐I (score of 1 or 2) compared with atypical agent (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors vs tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs)

Adverse effects during antidepressant treatment period (0‐12 weeks) · adults living with HIV and depression

It is very uncertain whether selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) changes adverse effects during antidepressant treatment period (0‐12 weeks) compared with tricyclic antidepressant (TCA) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors vs tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs)

Improvement in depression at 6‐12 weeks: HAM‐D score (dichotomized) · adults living with HIV and depression

It is very uncertain whether selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) changes improvement in depression at 6‐12 weeks: HAM‐D score (dichotomized) compared with tricyclic antidepressant (TCA) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors vs tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs)

Improvement in depression at 6‐12 weeks: CGI‐I (score of 1 or 2) · adults living with HIV and depression

It is very uncertain whether selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) changes improvement in depression at 6‐12 weeks: CGI‐I (score of 1 or 2) compared with tricyclic antidepressant (TCA) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors vs tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs)

Efficacy as a dichotomous outcome · patients with cancer and depression

It is very uncertain whether selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) changes efficacy as a dichotomous outcome compared with tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Energy, protein and micronutrients vs standard diet

Acceptability of nutritional supplements ‐ not reported · long‐term care patients; inpatients without dehydration with energy intake by tube feeding; patients with pressure ulcers

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Protein, arginine, zinc and antioxidants vs standard diet or placebo

Acceptability of nutritional supplements ‐ not reported · residents of long‐term care (≥ 65 years) with pressure ulcers; inpatients with pressure ulcers

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Energy, protein and micronutrients vs standard diet

Acceptability of nutritional supplements ‐ not reported · inpatients who are mildly or seriously malnourished or at risk of being malnourished, elderly patients at risk of developing pressure ulcers

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Arginine and micronutrients vs standard diet

Acceptability of nutritional supplements: non‐adherence · malnourished patients with pressure ulcers

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Arginine and micronutrients changes acceptability of nutritional supplements: non‐adherence compared with standard diet (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review