Improvement in depression at 6‐12 weeks: HAM‐D score (dichotomized) · adults living with HIV and depression
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) showed no clear difference in improvement in depression at 6‐12 weeks: HAM‐D score (dichotomized) compared with atypical agent (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Improvement in depression at 6‐12 weeks: CGI‐I (score of 1 or 2) · adults living with HIV and depression
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) showed no clear difference in improvement in depression at 6‐12 weeks: CGI‐I (score of 1 or 2) compared with atypical agent (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Dropout · adults living with HIV and depression
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) showed no clear difference in study dropouts at 6‐12 weeks compared with atypical agent (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Dropout · adults living with HIV and depression
It is very uncertain whether selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) changes study dropouts at 6‐12 weeks compared with tricyclic antidepressant (TCA) (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse effects during antidepressant treatment period (0‐12 weeks) · adults living with HIV and depression
It is very uncertain whether selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) changes adverse effects during antidepressant treatment period (0‐12 weeks) compared with tricyclic antidepressant (TCA) (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Improvement in depression at 6‐12 weeks: HAM‐D score (continuous) · adults living with HIV and depression
1 finding from 1 review
Improvement in depression at 6‐12 weeks: HAM‐D score (dichotomized) · adults living with HIV and depression
It is very uncertain whether selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) changes improvement in depression at 6‐12 weeks: HAM‐D score (dichotomized) compared with tricyclic antidepressant (TCA) (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Improvement in depression at 6‐12 weeks: CGI‐I (score of 1 or 2) · adults living with HIV and depression
It is very uncertain whether selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) changes improvement in depression at 6‐12 weeks: CGI‐I (score of 1 or 2) compared with tricyclic antidepressant (TCA) (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Efficacy as a continuous outcome · patients with cancer and depression
1 finding from 1 review
Efficacy as a dichotomous outcome · patients with cancer and depression
It is very uncertain whether selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) changes efficacy as a dichotomous outcome compared with tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Abstinence · cannabis dependence
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressant showed no clear difference in participants abstinent at end of treatment compared with placebo (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Participants with at least some Side Effects · cannabis dependence
It is very uncertain whether selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressant changes participants experiencing adverse effects compared with placebo (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Withdrawals due to adverse events · cannabis dependence
It is very uncertain whether selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressant changes participants withdrawn due to adverse effects compared with placebo (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Completion of scheduled treatment · cannabis dependence
It is very uncertain whether selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressant changes completion of scheduled treatment compared with placebo (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Acceptability of nutritional supplements ‐ not reported · long‐term care patients; inpatients without dehydration with energy intake by tube feeding; patients with pressure ulcers
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Acceptability of nutritional supplements ‐ not reported · residents of long‐term care (≥ 65 years) with pressure ulcers; inpatients with pressure ulcers
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Acceptability of nutritional supplements ‐ not reported · inpatients who are mildly or seriously malnourished or at risk of being malnourished, elderly patients at risk of developing pressure ulcers
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Acceptability of nutritional supplements: non‐adherence · malnourished patients with pressure ulcers
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Arginine and micronutrients changes acceptability of nutritional supplements: non‐adherence compared with standard diet (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Acceptability of nutritional supplements ‐ not reported · adults with pressure ulcers
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Acceptability of nutritional supplements ‐ not reported · patients (> 65 years) following hip fracture; patients with a recent stroke
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found