Monitoring of contractions with internal tocodynamometry showed no clear difference in hyperstimulation compared with external tocodynamometry (moderate certainty).
Monitoring of contractions with internal tocodynamometry showed no clear difference in apgar score less than seven at five minutes compared with external tocodynamometry (moderate certainty).
Monitoring of contractions with internal tocodynamometry showed no clear difference in umbilical artery pH < 7.15 compared with external tocodynamometry (moderate certainty).
Monitoring of contractions with internal tocodynamometry showed no clear difference in umbilical artery pH < 7.16 compared with external tocodynamometry (moderate certainty).
Monitoring of contractions with internal tocodynamometry showed no clear difference in admission to neonatal intensive care compared with external tocodynamometry (moderate certainty).
Monitoring of contractions with internal tocodynamometry showed no clear difference in instrumental vaginal delivery compared with external tocodynamometry (moderate certainty).
Monitoring of contractions with internal tocodynamometry showed no clear difference in caesarean section compared with external tocodynamometry (moderate certainty).
Web‐based disease monitoring showed no clear difference in flare‐ups/relapse (dichotomous; adults) compared with usual care (moderate certainty).
Web‐based disease monitoring showed no clear difference in flare‐ups/relapse (dichotomous; children) compared with usual care (low certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
It is very uncertain whether multi‐component interventions (with telehealth as a component of care) changes number of people experiencing at least 1 exacerbation/moderate to… compared with usual care (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether multi‐component interventions (with telehealth as a component of care) changes time to first exacerbation compared with usual care (very low certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.