Cochrane · systematic review · CD014821

Remote care through telehealth for people with inflammatory bowel disease

Gordon, M, Sinopoulou, V, Lakunina, S, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2023 · Cochrane Library

GutAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
19
current version
GRADE rated
14
No studies
5
Included studies
NR
No studies 5 · 26.3%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 9 · 47.4%Low 1 · 5.3%Moderate 4 · 21.1%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Web‐based disease monitoring compared to usual care

Population: people with inflammatory bowel disease
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Disease activity (adults)
Web‐based disease monitoring vs usual care
no estimate extracted3 studies · 428 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Flare‐ups/relapse (dichotomous; adults)
Web‐based disease monitoring vs usual care
RR 1.09 [0.93, 1.27]5 studies · 868 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Flare‐ups/relapse (continuous; adults)
Web‐based disease monitoring vs usual care
no estimate extracted1 study · 909 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Flare‐ups/relapse (dichotomous; children)
Web‐based disease monitoring vs usual care
RR 0.99 [0.65, 1.51]1 study · 170 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Quality of life (adults)
Web‐based disease monitoring vs usual care
no estimate extracted4 studies · 1099 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias

Web‐based disease monitoring compared to sham monitoring

Population: people with inflammatory bowel disease
3 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Disease activity
Web‐based disease monitoring vs sham monitoring
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Flare‐ups/relapse
Web‐based disease monitoring vs sham monitoring
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Quality of life (adults)
Web‐based disease monitoring vs sham monitoring
no estimate extracted2 studies · 447 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision

Web‐based disease monitoring compared to self‐screening

Population: people with inflammatory bowel disease
3 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Disease activity (adults)
Web‐based disease monitoring vs self‐screening
no estimate extracted1 study · 102 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Flare‐ups/relapse (dichotomous; adults)
Web‐based disease monitoring vs self‐screening
no estimate extracted1 study · 102 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Quality of life (adults)
Web‐based disease monitoring vs self‐screening
no estimate extracted1 study · 102 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision

Telephone‐based disease monitoring compared to face‐to‐face monitoring

Population: people with inflammatory bowel disease
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Disease activity (adults)
Telephone‐based disease monitoring vs face‐to‐face monitoring
no estimate extracted1 study · 60 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Flare‐ups/relapse (dichotomous; adults)
Telephone‐based disease monitoring vs face‐to‐face monitoring
RR 1.17 [0.47, 2.89]1 study · 42 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Flare‐ups/relapse (dichotomous; children)
Telephone‐based disease monitoring vs face‐to‐face monitoring
RR 0.24 [0.03, 2.05]1 study · 86 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Quality of life (adults)
Telephone‐based disease monitoring vs face‐to‐face monitoring
no estimate extracted2 studies · 123 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Quality of life (children)
Telephone‐based disease monitoring vs face‐to‐face monitoring
no estimate extracted1 study · 86 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision

Cognitive behavioural therapy manual and telephone support compared to usual care

Population: people with inflammatory bowel disease
3 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Disease activity
Cognitive behavioural therapy manual and telephone support vs usual care
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Flare‐ups/relapse
Cognitive behavioural therapy manual and telephone support vs usual care
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Quality of life
Cognitive behavioural therapy manual and telephone support vs usual care
no estimate extractedNRNo studies