Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

3,231 questions · 3,354 findings · 394 reviews

No studies found 803 · 23.9%GRADE not reported 267 · 8%Very low 757 · 22.6%Low 859 · 25.6%Moderate 486 · 14.5%High 182 · 5.4%

Anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor (anti‐VEGF) with or without pan‐retinal photocoagulation (PRP) vs PRP alone

Presence of vitreous haemorrhaged · proliferative diabetic retinopathy

Anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor (anti‐VEGF) with or without… probably leads to lower presence of vitreous haemorrhaged compared with PRP alone (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor (anti‐VEGF) with or without pan‐retinal photocoagulation (PRP) vs PRP alone

Need for vitrectomy · proliferative diabetic retinopathy

Anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor (anti‐VEGF) with or without… may leads to lower need for vitrectomy compared with PRP alone (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Overall survival (OS) ‐ Network (subnet 1) included 19 pairwise comparisons ‐ Median · people with a confirmed diagnosis of advanced renal cell carcinoma (combined risk groups) without previous systemic anticancer therapy

The intervention showed no clear difference in overall survival (OS) ‐ Network (subnet 1) included 19 pairwise… (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Progression‐free survival (PFS) ‐ Network (subnet 1) included 5 pairwise comparisons ‐ Median · people with a confirmed diagnosis of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and a favourable risk according to the International Metastatic…
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Time to initiation of first subsequent therapy · people with a confirmed diagnosis of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and a favourable risk according to the International Metastatic…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Overall survival (OS) ‐ Network (subnet 1) included 3 pairwise comparisons ‐ Median · people with a confirmed diagnosis of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and a favourable risk according to the International Metastatic…
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Progression‐free survival (PFS) ‐ Network (subnet 1) included 7 pairwise comparisons ‐ Median · people with a confirmed diagnosis of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and a favourable risk according to the International Metastatic…
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Quality of life (QoL) We reported this outcome narratively in this review. Here, long‐term results (i.e., at the end of treatment) are presented. In the comparison PAZ versus SUN, QoL was measured using FACIT‐F (score range 0‐52; higher scores rep... · people with a confirmed diagnosis of advanced renal cell carcinoma (combined risk groups) without previous systemic anticancer therapy

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Overall survival (OS) ‐ Network (subnet 1) included 10 pairwise comparisons ‐ Median · people with a confirmed diagnosis of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and an intermediate or poor risk according to the International…
1 finding from 1 review