Oral azithromycin vs topical tetracycline
Active trachoma · people (any age) with active trachoma
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted3 studies · 6002 participantsLow
Findings
What do systematic reviews say?
4,587 questions · 5,761 findings · 495 reviews
No studies found 1,011 · 17.5%GRADE not reported 1,797 · 31.2%Very low 1,100 · 19.1%Low 1,052 · 18.3%Moderate 649 · 11.3%High 152 · 2.6%
Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.
Oral azithromycin vs topical tetracycline
Ocular chlamydia trachomatis infection · people (any age) with active trachoma
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted3 studies · 5773 participantsLow
Oral azithromycin vs topical tetracycline
Antibiotic resistance · people (any age) with active trachoma
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Oral azithromycin vs topical tetracycline
Adverse effects · people (any age) with active trachoma
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted3 studies · 6002 participantsGRADE not reported
Oral azithromycin vs control
Active trachoma · people (any age) with active trachoma
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Oral mifepristone vs Foley catheter
Vaginal delivery not achieved within 24 hours · pregnant women, 40 weeks' gestation, single cephalic presentation, 1 previous low segment caesarean section
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- Methods of term labour induction for women with a previous caesarean section 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Oral mifepristone vs Foley catheter
Uterine hyperstimulation with fetal heart rate changes · pregnant women, 40 weeks' gestation, single cephalic presentation, 1 previous low segment caesarean section
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- Methods of term labour induction for women with a previous caesarean section 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Oral mifepristone vs Foley catheter
Caesarean section · pregnant women, 40 weeks' gestation, single cephalic presentation, 1 previous low segment caesarean section
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- Methods of term labour induction for women with a previous caesarean section 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Oral mifepristone vs Foley catheter
Serious neonatal morbidity or perinatal death · pregnant women, 40 weeks' gestation, single cephalic presentation, 1 previous low segment caesarean section
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- Methods of term labour induction for women with a previous caesarean section 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Oral mifepristone vs Foley catheter
Serious maternal morbidity or death · pregnant women, 40 weeks' gestation, single cephalic presentation, 1 previous low segment caesarean section
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- Methods of term labour induction for women with a previous caesarean section 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Oral tetracycline vs topical clindamycin
Participant global assessment VAS Visual analogue scale (VAS) (0 to 100 mm) · participants with hidradenitis suppurativa
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 34 participantsLow
Oral tetracycline vs topical clindamycin
Pain VAS VAS (0 to 100 mm) · participants with hidradenitis suppurativa
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 34 participantsLow
Oral tetracycline vs topical clindamycin
Nodules score Nodule count · participants with hidradenitis suppurativa
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 34 participantsLow
Oral tetracycline vs topical clindamycin
Abscesses score Abscess count · participants with hidradenitis suppurativa
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 34 participantsLow
Oral tetracycline vs topical clindamycin
Physician global assessment VAS VAS (0 to 100 mm) · participants with hidradenitis suppurativa
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 34 participantsLow
Oral ferric maltol vs IV ferric carboxymaltose
Number of responders ‐ disease activity not stated (12 weeks) · IBD patients
Oral ferric maltol showed no clear difference in number of responders ‐ disease activity not stated (12 weeks) compared with IV ferric carboxymaltose (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- Interventions for treating iron deficiency anaemia in inflammatory bowel disease 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyRR 0.83 [0.65, 1.06]1 study · 252 participantsLow
Oral ferric maltol vs IV ferric carboxymaltose
Serious adverse events (12 weeks) · IBD patients
It is very uncertain whether oral ferric maltol changes serious adverse events (12 weeks) compared with IV ferric carboxymaltose (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- Interventions for treating iron deficiency anaemia in inflammatory bowel disease 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyRR 2.95 [0.98, 8.91]1 study · 252 participantsVery low
Oral valproic acid vs placebo
Change in disability score · ambulatory adults with SMA type III
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted31 participantsLow
Oral valproic acid vs placebo
Muscle strength · ambulatory adults with SMA type III
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted30 participantsLow
Oral valproic acid vs placebo
Acquiring the ability to stand or walk · ambulatory adults with SMA type III
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found