Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

4,730 questions · 18,059 findings · 1,282 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 4,360 · 24.1%GRADE not reported 2,529 · 14%Very low 4,641 · 25.7%Low 4,007 · 22.2%Moderate 2,057 · 11.4%High 465 · 2.6%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

Occupational therapy vs usual care

5a. Visual attention overall (postintervention) · adults with cognitive impairment after stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Occupational therapy for cognitive impairment in stroke patients 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
13 studies · 620 participants
Low

Occupational therapy vs usual care

5c. Sustained visual attention (postintervention) · adults with cognitive impairment after stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Occupational therapy for cognitive impairment in stroke patients 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
10 studies · 463 participants
Moderate

Occupational therapy vs usual care

Cognitive subdomain: working memory measured at the end of · adults with cognitive impairment after stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Occupational therapy for cognitive impairment in stroke patients 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
8 studies · 420 participants
Low

Occupational therapy vs usual care

6b. Immediate verbal memory span (postintervention) · adults with cognitive impairment after stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Occupational therapy for cognitive impairment in stroke patients 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
8 studies · 357 participants
Very low

Occupational therapy vs usual care

6c. Immediate spatial memory span (postintervention) · adults with cognitive impairment after stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Occupational therapy for cognitive impairment in stroke patients 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
7 studies · 292 participants
Low

Occupational therapy vs usual care

7a. Executive functional performance overall (postintervention) · adults with cognitive impairment after stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Occupational therapy for cognitive impairment in stroke patients 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
11 studies · 550 participants
Very low

Occupational therapy vs usual care

7b. Cognitive flexibility (postintervention) · adults with cognitive impairment after stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Occupational therapy for cognitive impairment in stroke patients 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 43 participants
Low

Occupational therapy vs usual care

1a. BADL (postintervention) · adults with cognitive impairment after stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Occupational therapy for cognitive impairment in stroke patients 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
6 studies · 336 participants
Low

Occupational therapy vs usual care

2a. IADL (postintervention) · adults with cognitive impairment after stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Occupational therapy for cognitive impairment in stroke patients 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 88 participants
Very low

Occupational therapy vs usual care

2b. Other ADL/IADL (postintervention) · adults with cognitive impairment after stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Occupational therapy for cognitive impairment in stroke patients 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 111 participants
Very low

Occupational therapy vs usual care

Community integration · adults with cognitive impairment after stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Occupational therapy for cognitive impairment in stroke patients 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 78 participants
Low

Occupational therapy vs usual care

4a. Global cognitive functional performance (sensitivity analysis) (postintervention) · adults with cognitive impairment after stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Occupational therapy for cognitive impairment in stroke patients 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
9 studies · 432 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

Cost of intervention per month · children and adolescents with acute graft‐versus‐host disease after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

1 finding from 1 review

Extracorporeal photopheresis versus standard treatment for acute graft‐versus‐host disease after haematopoietic stem… 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
0 studies · 0 participants
GRADE not reported

Intervention not reported

Cost of intervention per month · children and adolescents with chronic graft‐versus‐host disease after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

1 finding from 1 review

Extracorporeal photopheresis versus alternative treatment for chronic graft‐versus‐host disease after haematopoietic… 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
0 studies · 0 participants
GRADE not reported

Binocular iPad treatment vs occlusion therapy

Participant adherence to intervention · 5‐ to 8‐year‐old children with amblyopia

1 finding from 1 review

Binocular versus standard occlusion or blurring treatment for unilateral amblyopia in children aged three to eight years 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 63 participants
Moderate

Binocular iPad treatment vs occlusion therapy

Measurable change in stereopsis after 8 (± 2) weeks and 16 (± 2) weeks of intervention 'Real change' in stereopsis is defined as a change in stereoacuity of two or more octaves. · 5‐ to 8‐year‐old children with amblyopia

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Binocular versus standard occlusion or blurring treatment for unilateral amblyopia in children aged three to eight years 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Child protection training for professionals to improve reporting of child abuse and neglect vs no training, waitlist control, or alternative training not related to child abuse and neglect (primary outcomes)

Number of reported cases of child abuse and neglect (professionals' self‐report, actual cases) Time of outcome assessment: short term (3 months postintervention) · postqualified professionals, including elementary and high school teachers, childcare professionals, medical practitioners, nurses, and…

1 finding from 1 review

Child protection training for professionals to improve reporting of child abuse and neglect 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 42 participants
Very low

Child protection training for professionals to improve reporting of child abuse and neglect vs no training, waitlist control, or alternative training not related to child abuse and neglect (primary outcomes)

Attitudes toward the duty to report child abuse and neglect Measured by: professionals’ self‐reported attitudes towards the duty to report child abuse and neglect Time of outcome assessment: short term (postintervention) · postqualified professionals, including elementary and high school teachers, childcare professionals, medical practitioners, nurses, and…

1 finding from 1 review

Child protection training for professionals to improve reporting of child abuse and neglect 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 741 participants
Very low

Child protection training for professionals to improve reporting of child abuse and neglect vs no training, waitlist control, or alternative training not related to child abuse and neglect (primary outcomes)

Number of reported cases of child abuse and neglect (professionals' self‐report, hypothetical vignette cases) Time of outcome assessment: short term (postintervention) · postqualified professionals, including elementary and high school teachers, childcare professionals, medical practitioners, nurses, and…

1 finding from 1 review

Child protection training for professionals to improve reporting of child abuse and neglect 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 87 participants
Very low

Child protection training for professionals to improve reporting of child abuse and neglect vs no training, waitlist control, or alternative training not related to child abuse and neglect (primary outcomes)

Knowledge of reporting duty, processes, and procedures Measured by: professionals' self‐reported knowledge of jurisdictional or institutional reporting duties, or both Time of outcome assessment: short term (postintervention) · postqualified professionals, including elementary and high school teachers, childcare professionals, medical practitioners, nurses, and…

1 finding from 1 review

Child protection training for professionals to improve reporting of child abuse and neglect 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 744 participants
Low