Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

1,590 questions in 129 reviews · Gynaecological, Neuro-oncology and Orphan Cancer

current versions
No studies 281 · 17.7%Ungraded 74 · 4.7%Very low 410 · 25.8%Low 420 · 26.4%Moderate 280 · 17.6%High 125 · 7.9%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Dexrazoxane vs no cardioprotective intervention
Cardiomyopathy/heart failure primary cause of death Available‐case analysis · children with cancer receiving anthracyclines
Dexrazoxane for preventing or reducing cardiotoxicity in adults and children with cancer receiving… (2022) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 1008 participantsLow
Dexrazoxane vs no cardioprotective intervention
Clinical heart failure and subclinical myocardial dysfunction combined Defined as (1) evidence of clinical congestive heart failure, (2) a reduction in LVEF as measured by MUGA to < 45% or (3) a decrease in LVEF as measured by MUGA of > 20 percent... · children with cancer receiving anthracyclines
Dexrazoxane for preventing or reducing cardiotoxicity in adults and children with cancer receiving… (2022) · Cochrane
RR 0.33 [0.13, 0.85]1 study · 33 participantsLow
Dexrazoxane vs no cardioprotective intervention
Clinical heart failure and subclinical myocardial dysfunction combined Defined as clinical heart failure (no definition provided) or subclinical myocardial dysfunction defined as decreased LVFS; however, it was stated that toxicity was graded acco... · children with cancer receiving anthracyclines
Dexrazoxane for preventing or reducing cardiotoxicity in adults and children with cancer receiving… (2022) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 537 participantsVery low
Dexrazoxane vs no cardioprotective intervention
Overall mortality (Reported as number of participants who died) · children with cancer receiving anthracyclines
Dexrazoxane for preventing or reducing cardiotoxicity in adults and children with cancer receiving… (2022) · Cochrane
HR 1.01 [0.72, 1.42]3 studies · 1008 participantsLow
Dexrazoxane vs no cardioprotective intervention
Progression‐free survival · children with cancer receiving anthracyclines
Dexrazoxane for preventing or reducing cardiotoxicity in adults and children with cancer receiving… (2022) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Dexrazoxane vs no cardioprotective intervention
Tumour response rate Defined as number of complete remissions (no definition of complete remission provided). Best‐case analysis · children with cancer receiving anthracyclines
Dexrazoxane for preventing or reducing cardiotoxicity in adults and children with cancer receiving… (2022) · Cochrane
RR 1.01 [0.95, 1.07]1 study · 206 participantsVery low
Dexrazoxane vs no cardioprotective intervention
Tumour response rate Defined as number of complete responses (i.e. disappearance of active Hodgkin lymphoma (gallium negative, ≥ 70% decrease in the sum of the products of the perpendicular diameters of measurable lesions, and negative bone marrow... · children with cancer receiving anthracyclines
Dexrazoxane for preventing or reducing cardiotoxicity in adults and children with cancer receiving… (2022) · Cochrane
RR 0.92 [0.84, 1.01]1 study · 200 participantsLow
Dexrazoxane vs no cardioprotective intervention
Quality of life · children with cancer receiving anthracyclines
Dexrazoxane for preventing or reducing cardiotoxicity in adults and children with cancer receiving… (2022) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Dexrazoxane vs no cardioprotective intervention or placebo
Clinical heart failure and subclinical myocardial dysfunction combined Comparable definitions; see Characteristics of included studies for exact definitions. Available‐case analysis · adults with cancer receiving anthracyclines
Dexrazoxane for preventing or reducing cardiotoxicity in adults and children with cancer receiving… (2022) · Cochrane
RR 0.37 [0.24, 0.56]3 studies · 417 participantsModerate
Dexrazoxane vs no cardioprotective intervention
Secondary malignant neoplasms Available‐case analysis · children with cancer receiving anthracyclines
Dexrazoxane for preventing or reducing cardiotoxicity in adults and children with cancer receiving… (2022) · Cochrane
RR 3.08 [1.13, 8.38]3 studies · 1015 participantsLow
Dexrazoxane vs no cardioprotective intervention or placebo
Clinical heart failure and subclinical myocardial dysfunction combined Comparable definitions; see Characteristics of included studies for exact definitions. Available‐case analysis · adults with cancer receiving anthracyclines
Dexrazoxane for preventing or reducing cardiotoxicity in adults and children with cancer receiving… (2022) · Cochrane
RR 0.46 [0.33, 0.66]2 studies · 534 participantsModerate
Dexrazoxane vs no cardioprotective intervention or placebo
Overall survival (Illustrative comparative risks reported as number of alive participants) · adults with cancer receiving anthracyclines
Dexrazoxane for preventing or reducing cardiotoxicity in adults and children with cancer receiving… (2022) · Cochrane
HR 1.04 [0.88, 1.23]4 studies · 4 participantsModerate
Dexrazoxane vs no cardioprotective intervention or placebo
Progression‐free survival Defined as time from first date of complete response, partial response or stable disease until the date progressive disease was first noticed (Illustrative comparative risks reported as number of participants without prog... · adults with cancer receiving anthracyclines
Dexrazoxane for preventing or reducing cardiotoxicity in adults and children with cancer receiving… (2022) · Cochrane
HR 0.62 [0.43, 0.9]1 study · 164 participantsLow
Dexrazoxane vs no cardioprotective intervention or placebo
Progression‐free survival Defined as time to progression; starting point nm (Illustrative comparative risks reported as number of participants without progression) · adults with cancer receiving anthracyclines
Dexrazoxane for preventing or reducing cardiotoxicity in adults and children with cancer receiving… (2022) · Cochrane
HR 0.95 [0.64, 1.4]1 study · 1 participantsLow
Dexrazoxane vs no cardioprotective intervention or placebo
Progression‐free survival Defined as time from randomisation to progression either on or off treatment (Illustrative comparative risks reported as number of participants without progression) · adults with cancer receiving anthracyclines
Dexrazoxane for preventing or reducing cardiotoxicity in adults and children with cancer receiving… (2022) · Cochrane
HR 1.18 [0.97, 1.43]2 studies · 2 participantsModerate
Dexrazoxane vs no cardioprotective intervention or placebo
Tumour response rate Defined as number of complete or partial remissions Available‐case analysis · adults with cancer receiving anthracyclines
Dexrazoxane for preventing or reducing cardiotoxicity in adults and children with cancer receiving… (2022) · Cochrane
RR 0.91 [0.79, 1.04]6 studies · 956 participantsModerate
Dexrazoxane vs no cardioprotective intervention or placebo
Quality of life · adults with cancer receiving anthracyclines
Dexrazoxane for preventing or reducing cardiotoxicity in adults and children with cancer receiving… (2022) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Small‐volume residual disease (SVRD) < 1 cm vs NMRD
Overall survival: Median length of · women with advanced EOC after PDS
Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian… (2022) · Cochrane
HR 2.03 [1.8, 2.29]17 studies · 9404 participantsModerate
Large‐volume residual disease (LVRD) > 1 cm vs no macroscopic residual disease (NMRD)
Progression‐free survival · women with advanced EOC after primary IDS
Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian… (2022) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Large‐volume residual disease (LVRD) > 1 cm vs small‐volume residual disease (SVRD) < 1 cm
Overall survival: Median length of · women with advanced EOC after primary IDS
Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian… (2022) · Cochrane
HR 1.6 [1.21, 2.11]6 studies · 1572 participantsVery low
Large‐volume residual disease (LVRD) > 1 cm vs small‐volume residual disease (SVRD) < 1 cm
Progression‐free survival: Median length of · women with advanced EOC after primary IDS
Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian… (2022) · Cochrane
HR 1.76 [1.23, 2.52]4 studies · 1145 participantsVery low
Residual disease (RD) > 0 cm vs NMRD
Overall survival: Median length of · women with advanced EOC after primary IDS
Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian… (2022) · Cochrane
HR 2.11 [1.35, 3.29]4 studies · 906 participantsVery low
Residual disease (RD) > 0 cm vs NMRD
Progression‐free survival: Median length of · women with advanced EOC after primary IDS
Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian… (2022) · Cochrane
HR 1.36 [1.05, 1.76]1 study · 471 participantsVery low
Small‐volume residual disease (SVRD) < 1 cm vs NMRD
Progression‐free survival: Median length of · women with advanced EOC after PDS
Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian… (2022) · Cochrane
HR 1.88 [1.63, 2.16]10 studies · 6596 participantsModerate
Large‐volume residual disease (LVRD) > 1 cm vs no macroscopic residual disease (NMRD)
Overall survival: Median length of · women with advanced ovarian cancer after PDS
Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian… (2022) · Cochrane
HR 2.5 [2.13, 2.94]14 studies · 7988 participantsModerate
Large‐volume residual disease (LVRD) > 1 cm vs no macroscopic residual disease (NMRD)
Progression‐free survival: Median length of · women with advanced ovarian cancer after PDS
Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian… (2022) · Cochrane
HR 2.1 [1.84, 2.4]6 studies · 2629 participantsModerate
Large‐volume residual disease (LVRD) > 1 cm vs small‐volume residual disease (SVRD) < 1 cm
Overall survival: Median length of · women with advanced EOC after PDS
Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian… (2022) · Cochrane
HR 1.22 [1.13, 1.32]5 studies · 6000 participantsModerate
Large‐volume residual disease (LVRD) > 1 cm vs small‐volume residual disease (SVRD) < 1 cm
Progression‐free survival: Median length of · women with advanced EOC after PDS
Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian… (2022) · Cochrane
HR 1.3 [1.08, 1.56]2 studies · 3402 participantsModerate
Small‐volume residual disease (SVRD) (< 1 cm) vs NMRD
Overall survival: Median length of · women with advanced EOC after primary IDS
Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian… (2022) · Cochrane
HR 2.09 [1.2, 3.6]1 study · 310 participantsVery low
Small‐volume residual disease (SVRD) (< 1 cm) vs NMRD
Progression‐free survival: Median length of · women with advanced EOC after primary IDS
Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian… (2022) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 322 participantsVery low
Large‐volume residual disease (LVRD) > 1 cm vs no macroscopic residual disease (NMRD)
Overall survival: Median length of · women with advanced EOC after primary IDS
Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian… (2022) · Cochrane
HR 2.23 [1.49, 3.34]1 study · 343 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Invitation versus control: uptake of screening · women for cervical screening
Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening (2021) · Cochrane
RR 1.71 [1.49, 1.96]24 studies · 141391 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
GP invitation letter versus invitation letter from other authority sources: uptake of screening · women for cervical screening
Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening (2021) · Cochrane
RR 1.69 [0.75, 3.82]2 studies · 86 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Personal invitation versus invitation letter: uptake of screening · women for cervical screening
Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening (2021) · Cochrane
RR 1.32 [1.11, 1.56]5 studies · 27663 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Letter with fixed appointment versus letter with open invitation to make appointment: uptake of screening · women for cervical screening
Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening (2021) · Cochrane
RR 1.61 [1.48, 1.75]5 studies · 5742 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Counselling versus control: uptake of screening · women for cervical screening
Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening (2021) · Cochrane
RR 1.23 [1.04, 1.45]2 studies · 393 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Counselling versus other: uptake of screening · women for cervical screening
Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening (2021) · Cochrane
RR 1.13 [0.9, 1.41]1 study · 208 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Education versus control: uptake of screening · women for cervical screening
Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening (2021) · Cochrane
RR 1.35 [1.18, 1.54]13 studies · 63415 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Education versus other: uptake of screening · women for cervical screening
Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2500 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Antibiotics prior to long‐term CVC insertion versus control: catheter‐related infections · adults and children diagnosed with an oncologic disease with a newly‐inserted long‐term CVC who were at risk of…
Prophylactic antibiotics for preventing gram‐positive infections associated with long‐term central venous… (2021) · Cochrane
Risk ratio 0.67 [0.32, 1.43]5 studies · 648 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Antibiotic versus heparin only lock/flush solution: catheter‐related infections · adults and children diagnosed with an oncologic disease with a newly‐inserted long‐term CVC who were at risk of…
Prophylactic antibiotics for preventing gram‐positive infections associated with long‐term central venous… (2021) · Cochrane
Rate ratio 0.47 [0.26, 0.85]5 studies · 443 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Antibiotic versus heparin only lock/flush solution: adverse events · adults and children diagnosed with an oncologic disease with a newly‐inserted long‐term CVC who were at risk of…
Prophylactic antibiotics for preventing gram‐positive infections associated with long‐term central venous… (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 300 participantsLow
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to interval surgery (NACT) vs surgery followed by chemotherapy (PDS)
Overall survival ( · women with advanced ovarian epithelial cancer
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery versus surgery followed by chemotherapy for initial treatment in… (2021) · Cochrane
HR 0.96 [0.86, 1.08]4 studies · 2000 participantsHigh
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to interval surgery (NACT) vs surgery followed by chemotherapy (PDS)
Progression‐free survival ( · women with advanced ovarian epithelial cancer
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery versus surgery followed by chemotherapy for initial treatment in… (2021) · Cochrane
HR 0.98 [0.88, 1.08]4 studies · 1847 participantsModerate
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to interval surgery (NACT) vs surgery followed by chemotherapy (PDS)
Surgically‐related severe adverse effects (grade 3+) ‐ stoma formation (within 30 days of surgery) · women with advanced ovarian epithelial cancer
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery versus surgery followed by chemotherapy for initial treatment in… (2021) · Cochrane
RR 0.29 [0.12, 0.74]2 studies · 632 participantsModerate
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to interval surgery (NACT) vs surgery followed by chemotherapy (PDS)
Surgically‐related severe adverse effects (grade 3+) ‐ bowel resection (within 30 days of surgery) · women with advanced ovarian epithelial cancer
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery versus surgery followed by chemotherapy for initial treatment in… (2021) · Cochrane
RR 0.49 [0.3, 0.79]4 studies · 1565 participantsModerate
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to interval surgery (NACT) vs surgery followed by chemotherapy (PDS)
Surgically‐related severe adverse effects (grade 3+) ‐ postoperative G3+ events (within 30 days of surgery) · women with advanced ovarian epithelial cancer
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery versus surgery followed by chemotherapy for initial treatment in… (2021) · Cochrane
RR 0.22 [0.13, 0.38]2 studies · 435 participantsModerate
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to interval surgery (NACT) vs surgery followed by chemotherapy (PDS)
Surgically‐related postoperative mortality (28 days to 6 months of surgery4) · women with advanced ovarian epithelial cancer
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery versus surgery followed by chemotherapy for initial treatment in… (2021) · Cochrane
RR 0.16 [0.06, 0.46]5 studies · 1623 participantsHigh
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to interval surgery (NACT) vs surgery followed by chemotherapy (PDS)
EORTC QLQ‐C30 QoL at 6 months ‐ global health · women with advanced ovarian epithelial cancer
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery versus surgery followed by chemotherapy for initial treatment in… (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 524 participantsVery low
Vitamin K antagonist (VKA) prophylaxis vs no prophylaxis
Outcome: · ambulatory people with cancer without venous thromboembolism receiving systemic therapy
Oral anticoagulation in people with cancer who have no therapeutic or prophylactic indication for… (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies