Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

143 questions · 143 findings · 8 reviews

No studies found 41 · 28.7%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 38 · 26.6%Low 33 · 23.1%Moderate 25 · 17.5%High 6 · 4.2%

Ultrasound‐guided embryo transfer vs clinical touch

Ongoing pregnancy / live birth rate per woman · Women undergoing embryo transfer as part of IVF or ICSI cycle

Ultrasound‐guided embryo transfer may leads to higher live birth and ongoing pregnancy (per woman randomised) compared with clinical touch (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Ultrasound‐guided embryo transfer vs clinical touch

Clinical pregnancies Number of clinical pregnancies per woman randomised · Women undergoing embryo transfer as part of IVF or ICSI cycle

Ultrasound‐guided embryo transfer probably leads to higher clinical pregnancy (per woman randomised) compared with clinical touch (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Ultrasound‐guided embryo transfer vs clinical touch

Multiple pregnancy rate · Women undergoing embryo transfer as part of IVF or ICSI cycle

Ultrasound‐guided embryo transfer showed no clear difference in multiple pregnancy (per woman randomised) compared with clinical touch (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review