Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

110 questions · 112 findings · 14 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 35 · 31.3%GRADE not reported 4 · 3.6%Very low 21 · 18.8%Low 29 · 25.9%Moderate 20 · 17.9%High 3 · 2.7%

Intervention not reported

Occurrence of any CIN in histology at 24 months · women with ASCUS or LSIL

The intervention may leads to higher occurrence of any CIN in histology at 24 months (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Immediate referral to colposcopy versus cytological surveillance for minor cervical cytological abnormalities in the… 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 2.02 [1.33, 3.08]
2 studies · 656 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

Default rates at 6 months · women with ASCUS or LSIL

The intervention probably leads to higher default rates at 6 months (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Immediate referral to colposcopy versus cytological surveillance for minor cervical cytological abnormalities in the… 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 3.85 [1.27, 11.63]
3 studies · 5117 participants
Moderate

Intervention not reported

Default rates at 12 months · women with ASCUS or LSIL

The intervention probably leads to higher default rates at 12 months (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Immediate referral to colposcopy versus cytological surveillance for minor cervical cytological abnormalities in the… 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 6.6
3 studies · 5115 participants
Moderate

Fetal growth (biometry) + umbilical artery Doppler vs fetal growth

Any perinatal death after randomisation · women with twin pregnancies were randomised from 25 weeks

Fetal growth (biometry) + umbilical artery Doppler showed no clear difference in perinatal mortality (after randomisation) compared with fetal growth (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Regimens of ultrasound surveillance for twin pregnancies for improving outcomes 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.88 [0.32, 2.41]
1 study · 1052 participants
Low

Fetal growth (biometry) + umbilical artery Doppler vs fetal growth

Neonatal mortality · women with twin pregnancies were randomised from 25 weeks

Fetal growth (biometry) + umbilical artery Doppler showed no clear difference in neonatal death compared with fetal growth (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Regimens of ultrasound surveillance for twin pregnancies for improving outcomes 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.01 [0.29, 3.46]
1 study · 1052 participants
Low

Fetal growth (biometry) + umbilical artery Doppler vs fetal growth

Preterm birth less than 28 weeks · women with twin pregnancies were randomised from 25 weeks

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Regimens of ultrasound surveillance for twin pregnancies for improving outcomes 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Fetal growth (biometry) + umbilical artery Doppler vs fetal growth

Gestational age at birth (weeks) · women with twin pregnancies were randomised from 25 weeks

Fetal growth (biometry) + umbilical artery Doppler showed no clear difference in gestational age at birth (weeks) compared with fetal growth (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Regimens of ultrasound surveillance for twin pregnancies for improving outcomes 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
MD 0.1
1 study · 526 participants
Moderate

Fetal growth (biometry) + umbilical artery Doppler vs fetal growth

Caesarean section · women with twin pregnancies were randomised from 25 weeks

Fetal growth (biometry) + umbilical artery Doppler showed no clear difference in caesarean section (any) compared with fetal growth (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Regimens of ultrasound surveillance for twin pregnancies for improving outcomes 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1 [0.81, 1.23]
1 study · 526 participants
High

Fetal growth (biometry) + umbilical artery Doppler vs fetal growth

Induction of labour · women with twin pregnancies were randomised from 25 weeks

Fetal growth (biometry) + umbilical artery Doppler showed no clear difference in induction of labour compared with fetal growth (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Regimens of ultrasound surveillance for twin pregnancies for improving outcomes 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.1 [0.8, 1.5]
1 study · 526 participants
Moderate

Fetal growth (biometry) + umbilical artery Doppler vs fetal growth

Number of antenatal hospital admissions · women with twin pregnancies were randomised from 25 weeks

Fetal growth (biometry) + umbilical artery Doppler showed no clear difference in antenatal admission to hospital compared with fetal growth (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Regimens of ultrasound surveillance for twin pregnancies for improving outcomes 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.96 [0.8, 1.15]
1 study · 526 participants
High