Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

157 questions · 161 findings · 19 reviews · Incontinence

No studies found 52 · 32.3%GRADE not reported 10 · 6.2%Very low 24 · 14.9%Low 36 · 22.4%Moderate 35 · 21.7%High 4 · 2.5%

One type of repeat midurethral tape vs another type of repeat midurethral tape

General health status evaluation e.g. Short Form (SF)‐36 ‐ not reported · women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed minimally invasive midurethral tape surgery

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Artificial urinary sphincter implantation vs endourethral Macroplastique injection

Success rate ‐ dry · men with stress urinary incontinence due to presumed sphincter deficiency after prostate surgery

It is very uncertain whether artificial urinary sphincter implantation changes success rate ‐ dry compared with endourethral Macroplastique injection (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Vaginal hysterectomy vs sacral hysteropexy/cervicopexy (uterine prolapse)

Prolapse on examination (Stage 2 or above) ‐ Any recurrent prolapse · women with apical uterine prolapse

Vaginal hysterectomy showed no clear difference in prolapse on examination (Stage 2 or greater) ‐ Any recurrent prolapse compared with sacral hysteropexy/cervicopexy (uterine prolapse) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Vaginal hysteropexy vs sacral hysteropexy (uterine prolapse)

Prolapse on examination (Stage 2 or above) ‐ Any recurrent prolapse · women with apical uterine prolapse

Vaginal hysteropexy showed no clear difference in prolapse on examination (Stage 2 or above) ‐ Any recurrent prolapse compared with sacral hysteropexy (uterine prolapse) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review