Cochrane · systematic review · CD008306
Surgery for stress urinary incontinence due to presumed sphincter deficiency after prostate surgery
Silva, LA, Andriolo, RB, Atallah, ÁN, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2014 · Cochrane Library
IncontinenceAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
2
current version
GRADE rated
2
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 2 · 100%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Artificial urinary sphincter implantation compared with endourethral Macroplastique injection for the treatment of post‐prostatectomy incontinence
Population: men with stress urinary incontinence due to presumed sphincter deficiency after prostate surgery
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Success rate ‐ dry Artificial urinary sphincter implantation vs endourethral Macroplastique injection | OR 5.67 [1.28, 25.1] | 1 study · 45 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Adverse events Artificial urinary sphincter implantation vs endourethral Macroplastique injection | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 45 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |