Marginal bone level change · Patients who are having osseointegrated root-form dental implants
Immediate loading showed no clear difference in marginal bone level changes compared with early loading; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
MD -0.06 [-0.16, 0.03]
3 studies
GRADE not reported
Marginal bone level change · Patients who are having osseointegrated root-form dental implants
Occlusal loading showed no clear difference in marginal bone level changes compared with non-occlusal loading; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
MD 0.03 [-0.10, 0.15]
2 studies
GRADE not reported
Implant failure · Patients who are having osseointegrated root-form dental implants
Occlusal loading showed no clear difference in implant failure compared with non-occlusal loading; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 1.00 [0.31, 3.22]
2 studies
GRADE not reported
Progressive loading vs Direct loading
Outcome not reported · Patients who are having osseointegrated root-form dental implants
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
Marginal bone level change · Patients who are having osseointegrated root-form dental implants
Immediate loading led to lower marginal bone level changes compared with conventional loading; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
MD -0.10 [-0.20, -0.01]
9 studies
GRADE not reported
Implant failure · Patients who are having osseointegrated root-form dental implants
Early loading showed no clear difference in implant failure compared with conventional loading; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 1.55 [0.46, 5.18]
2 studies
GRADE not reported
Marginal bone level change · Patients who are having osseointegrated root-form dental implants
Early loading showed no clear difference in marginal bone level changes compared with conventional loading; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
MD -0.04 [-0.15, 0.07]
2 studies
GRADE not reported
Prosthesis failure · Patients who are having osseointegrated root-form dental implants
Occlusal loading showed no clear difference in prosthesis failure compared with non-occlusal loading; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 1.00 [0.31, 3.22]
2 studies
GRADE not reported
Prosthesis failure · Patients who are having osseointegrated root-form dental implants
It is very uncertain whether immediate loading changes prosthesis failure compared with conventional loading (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Implant failure · Patients who are having osseointegrated root-form dental implants
Immediate loading showed no clear difference in implant failure compared with conventional loading; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 1.50 [0.60, 3.77]
10 studies
GRADE not reported
Implant failure · Patients who are having osseointegrated root-form dental implants
Immediate loading showed no clear difference in implant failure compared with early loading; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 0.65 [0.26, 1.64]
5 studies
GRADE not reported
Prosthesis failure · Patients who are having osseointegrated root-form dental implants
It is very uncertain whether early loading changes prosthesis failure compared with conventional loading (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Vertical bone gain · Patients with vertically deficient posterior/anterior mandibular ridges needing implants
Vertical GBR with autogenous bone (retromolar) led to higher vertical bone gain compared with vertical GBR with bone substitute (Regenaform); GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
MD 0.6 [0.21, 0.99]
1 study · 5 participants
GRADE not reported
Changes in vertical height of alveolar ridge (mm) · Adults aged 18 years or older, in good general health (including well-controlled systemic disease), requiring extraction of one or more…
It is very uncertain whether ARP with alloplast plus barrier membrane changes changes in vertical height of alveolar ridge (mm) compared with ARP with alloplast without membrane (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Aesthetic outcomes of future prosthodontic rehabilitation · Adults aged 18 years or older, in good general health (including well-controlled systemic disease), requiring extraction of one or more…
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
Outcome not reported
0 studies
No studies found
Marginal bone level change · Adults aged 18 years or older, in good general health (including well-controlled systemic disease), requiring extraction of one or more…
1 finding from 1 review
Changes in bucco-lingual/palatal width of alveolar ridge (mm) · Adults aged 18 years or older, in good general health (including well-controlled systemic disease), requiring extraction of one or more…
It is very uncertain whether ARP with xenograft (bone graft) changes changes in bucco-lingual/palatal width of alveolar ridge (mm) compared with extraction alone (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Aesthetic outcomes of future prosthodontic rehabilitation · Adults aged 18 years or older, in good general health (including well-controlled systemic disease), requiring extraction of one or more…
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
Outcome not reported
0 studies
No studies found
Changes in probing depth (PD) at teeth adjacent to the extraction site · Adults aged 18 years or older, in good general health (including well-controlled systemic disease), requiring extraction of one or more…
ARP with alloplast showed no clear difference in changes in probing depth (PD) at teeth adjacent to the extraction site compared with ARP with xenograft; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Changes in vertical height of alveolar ridge (mm) · Adults aged 18 years or older, in good general health (including well-controlled systemic disease), requiring extraction of one or more…
It is very uncertain whether ARP with allograft changes changes in vertical height of alveolar ridge (mm) compared with ARP with xenograft (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review