Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

112 questions · 112 findings · 9 reviews

No studies found 35 · 31.3%GRADE not reported 21 · 18.8%Very low 13 · 11.6%Low 20 · 17.9%Moderate 23 · 20.5%High 0 · 0%

Cyclosporin (systemic; 10 mg/kg/day for 16 weeks) vs Colchicine (systemic; 1 mg daily)

Safety of the intervention (adverse effects) · People with Behcet's disease with a history of recurrent oral aphthous-type (RAS-type) ulcers diagnosed clinically; primary care
1 finding from 1 review

Cyclosporin (systemic; 10 mg/kg/day for 16 weeks) vs Colchicine (systemic; 1 mg daily)

Alleviation of oral aphthous ulcers · People with Behcet's disease with a history of recurrent oral aphthous-type (RAS-type) ulcers diagnosed clinically; primary care

Cyclosporin (systemic; 10 mg/kg/day for 16 weeks) led to higher alleviation of oral aphthous ulcers compared with colchicine (systemic; 1 mg daily); GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

months Chest pain + (ECG changes +/‐ echocardiographic changes +/‐ raised inflammatory markers)

The intervention probably leads to lower months Chest pain + (ECG changes +/‐ echocardiographic changes +/‐… (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Symptom relief at 72 hours Patient reported

The intervention may leads to higher symptom relief at 72 hours Patient reported (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Total adverse effects Patient reported

The intervention showed no clear difference in total adverse effects Patient reported (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Adverse effects necessitating stop of therapy Patient reported

The intervention probably leads to higher adverse effects necessitating stop of therapy Patient reported (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

months Chest pain + (ECG changes +/‐ echocardiographic changes +/‐ raised inflammatory markers)

The intervention probably leads to lower months Chest pain + (ECG changes +/‐ echocardiographic changes +/‐… (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

months Chest pain + (ECG changes +/‐ echocardiographic changes +/‐ raised inflammatory markers)

The intervention probably leads to lower months Chest pain + (ECG changes +/‐ echocardiographic changes +/‐… (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

months Chest pain + (ECG changes +/‐ echocardiographic changes +/‐ raised inflammatory markers)

The intervention probably leads to lower months Chest pain + (ECG changes +/‐ echocardiographic changes +/‐… (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

months Chest pain + (ECG changes +/‐ echocardiographic changes +/‐ raised inflammatory markers)

The intervention probably leads to lower months Chest pain + (ECG changes +/‐ echocardiographic changes +/‐… (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

months Chest pain + (ECG changes +/‐ echocardiographic changes +/‐ raised inflammatory markers)

The intervention probably leads to lower months Chest pain + (ECG changes +/‐ echocardiographic changes +/‐… (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review