Acupoint PC6 stimulation vs sham
- Stimulation of the wrist acupuncture point PC6 for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extracted6 studies · 35 participantsGRADE not reported
Acupoint PC6 stimulation showed no clear difference in nausea ‐ All antiemetics combined compared with antiemetic drug (moderate certainty).
Acupoint PC6 stimulation showed no clear difference in vomiting ‐ All antiemetics combined compared with antiemetic drug (moderate certainty).
Acupoint PC6 stimulation showed no clear difference in rescue antiemetic compared with antiemetic drug (moderate certainty).
It is very uncertain whether acupoint PC6 stimulation and antiemetic combination changes nausea compared with antiemetic (very low certainty).
lidocaine may leads to lower risk of sore throat 12 hours to 30 hours after the operation compared with control (air/saline) (low certainty).
Peribulbar showed no clear difference in globe akinesia extraocular muscle motility compared with retrobulbar (low certainty).
Peribulbar showed no clear difference in need for additional injection Number of additional injections compared with retrobulbar (low certainty).
Peribulbar showed no clear difference in local complications ‐ Retrobular haemorrhage compared with retrobulbar (moderate certainty).
Peribulbar probably leads to higher local complications ‐ Conjunctival chemosis presence of conjunctival… compared with retrobulbar (moderate certainty).
Peribulbar showed no clear difference in local complications ‐ Ptosis compared with retrobulbar (moderate certainty).
Peribulbar showed no clear difference in acceptability of blocks compared with retrobulbar (moderate certainty).
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes co‐operation during induction ‐ Video 'fairytale' vs. no audiovisual… (very low certainty).