Question · asked by 1 review
Acupoint PC6 stimulation vs sham: Adverse effects
- Population
- People at risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting
- Intervention
- Acupoint PC6 stimulation
- Comparison
- sham
- Outcome
- Adverse effects
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Acupoint PC6 stimulation vs sham Adverse effects · People at risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting Stimulation of the wrist acupuncture point PC6 for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting (2015) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 6 studies · 35 participants | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stimulation of the wrist acupuncture point PC6 for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Acupoint PC6 stimulation vs antiemetics · People at risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.