Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

3,971 questions · 9,849 findings · 853 reviews

No studies found 1,150 · 11.7%GRADE not reported 3,387 · 34.4%Very low 1,963 · 19.9%Low 1,809 · 18.4%Moderate 1,207 · 12.3%High 333 · 3.4%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

Doxapram vs no treatment, placebo, methylxanthine (including theophylline, aminophylline, or caffeine), or

5a.Moderate‐to‐severe neurodevelopmental disability or intellectual impairment after 2 years of age – doxapram compared to no treatment for the prevention of reintubation · prevention of reintubation

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Doxapram vs no treatment, placebo, methylxanthine (including theophylline, aminophylline, or caffeine), or

5b. Moderate‐to‐severe neurodevelopmental disability or intellectual impairment after 2 years of age – doxapram compared to alternative treatment for the prevention of reintubation · prevention of reintubation

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Composite strip crown (CSC) with a post (microhybrid composite resin, Amelogen) vs Post type: composite post (CP) vs fibre post (FP) vs reverse metal post (RMP)

Treatment failure (annual failure rate) · Children with severely decayed maxillary primary incisors treated by pulpectomy (non-vital pulp therapy)

Composite strip crowns with composite posts had a low annual failure rate (2.3%) in maxillary primary incisors after pulpectomy (single high-risk-of-bias RCT; low quality of evidence; not GRADE-rated).

3 findings from 1 review

Dental examinations at three-month intervals and preventive treatments vs usual care

MRONJ (incidence proportion) · Men with metastatic prostate cancer receiving intravenous zoledronic acid (at risk of MRONJ)

It is very uncertain whether dental examinations at three-month intervals and preventive treatments changes MRONJ (incidence proportion) compared with standard care (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pyronaridine‐artesunate (PY‐AS) vs artemether‐lumefantrine (AL)

Total failure: day 28 (PCR‐adjusted) · adults and children with uncomplicated P falciparum malaria

Pyronaridine‐artesunate (PY‐AS) showed no clear difference in total failure: day 28 (PCR‐adjusted) compared with artemether‐lumefantrine (AL) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pyronaridine‐artesunate (PY‐AS) vs artemether‐lumefantrine (AL)

Total failure: day 42 (PCR‐adjusted) · adults and children with uncomplicated P falciparum malaria

Pyronaridine‐artesunate (PY‐AS) showed no clear difference in total failure: day 42 (PCR‐adjusted) compared with artemether‐lumefantrine (AL) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pyronaridine‐artesunate (PY‐AS) vs artemether‐lumefantrine (AL)

Total failure: day 28 (unadjusted) · adults and children with uncomplicated P falciparum malaria

Pyronaridine‐artesunate (PY‐AS) may leads to lower total failure: day 28 (unadjusted) compared with artemether‐lumefantrine (AL) (low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Pyronaridine‐artesunate (PY‐AS) vs artemether‐lumefantrine (AL)

Serious adverse events (42 days) · adults and children with uncomplicated P falciparum malaria

Pyronaridine‐artesunate (PY‐AS) showed no clear difference in serious adverse events (42 days) compared with artemether‐lumefantrine (AL) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pyronaridine‐artesunate (PY‐AS) vs artemether‐lumefantrine (AL)

First treatment, abnormal ALT increase (42 days) · adults and children with uncomplicated P falciparum malaria

Pyronaridine‐artesunate (PY‐AS) may leads to higher first treatment, abnormal ALT increase (42 days) compared with artemether‐lumefantrine (AL) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pyronaridine‐artesunate (PY‐AS) vs artemether‐lumefantrine (AL)

First treatment, abnormal AST increase (42 days) · adults and children with uncomplicated P falciparum malaria

Pyronaridine‐artesunate (PY‐AS) may leads to higher first treatment, abnormal AST increase (42 days) compared with artemether‐lumefantrine (AL) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pyronaridine‐artesunate (PY‐AS) vs artemether‐lumefantrine (AL)

First treatment, abnormal bilirubin increase (42 days) · adults and children with uncomplicated P falciparum malaria

Pyronaridine‐artesunate (PY‐AS) showed no clear difference in first treatment, abnormal bilirubin increase (42 days) compared with artemether‐lumefantrine (AL) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Rituximab vs intravenous methylprednisolone

CAS improvement (decrease) by 2 or more points · thyroid‐associated ophthalmopathy

Summary of findings table ‐ Rituximab showed no clear difference in CAS improvement (decrease) by 2 or more points compared with intravenous methylprednisolone (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Rituximab vs intravenous methylprednisolone

NOSPECS improvement (decrease) by 2 classes or more · thyroid‐associated ophthalmopathy

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Rituximab changes NOSPECS improvement (decrease) by 2 or more classes compared with intravenous methylprednisolone (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Rituximab vs intravenous methylprednisolone

Proptosis improvement (decrease) by 2 mm or more · thyroid‐associated ophthalmopathy

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Rituximab changes proptosis improvement (decrease) by 2 mm or more compared with intravenous methylprednisolone (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Rituximab vs intravenous methylprednisolone

Palpebral aperture improvement (decrease) by 3 mm or more · thyroid‐associated ophthalmopathy

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Rituximab changes palpebral aperture improvement (decrease) by 3 mm or more compared with intravenous methylprednisolone (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review