Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

1,773 questions · 1,817 findings · 212 reviews · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 383 · 21.1%GRADE not reported 192 · 10.6%Very low 472 · 26%Low 444 · 24.4%Moderate 228 · 12.5%High 98 · 5.4%

Summary of findings ‐ Erector spinae plane block vs intercostal nerve block

Rates of block‐related adverse events · adults undergoing surgery with general anaesthesia

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings ‐ Erector spinae plane block changes rates of block‐related adverse events compared with intercostal nerve block (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings ‐ Erector spinae plane block vs paravertebral block

Rates of block‐related adverse events · adults undergoing surgery with general anaesthesia

Summary of findings ‐ Erector spinae plane block probably leads to lower rates of block‐related adverse events compared with paravertebral block (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings ‐ Erector spinae plane block vs transversus abdominis plane block

Rates of block‐related adverse events · adults undergoing surgery with general anaesthesia

Summary of findings ‐ Erector spinae plane block showed no clear difference in rates of block‐related adverse events compared with transversus abdominis plane block (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Telerehabilitation vs self‐training

Vision‐related patient‐reported outcome measurement at 6 months (the greater the score, the better) · people with any eye disease including optic nerve disease, age‐related macular degeneration, retinopathy of prematurity, retinitis…
1 finding from 1 review

Telerehabilitation vs self‐training

Clinical measures, such as reading speed or reading acuity at 6 months · people with any eye disease including optic nerve disease, age‐related macular degeneration, retinopathy of prematurity, retinitis…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Telerehabilitation vs self‐training

Technical difficulties · people with any eye disease including optic nerve disease, age‐related macular degeneration, retinopathy of prematurity, retinitis…

It is very uncertain whether telerehabilitation changes technical difficulties with the intervention at 6 months compared with self‐training (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Telerehabilitation vs self‐training

Device abandonment rate at 6 months · people with any eye disease including optic nerve disease, age‐related macular degeneration, retinopathy of prematurity, retinitis…

It is very uncertain whether telerehabilitation changes device abandonment rate at 6 months compared with self‐training (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review