Question · asked by 1 review

Summary of findings ‐ Erector spinae plane block vs paravertebral block: Rates of block‐related adverse events

Population
adults undergoing surgery with general anaesthesia
Intervention
Summary of findings ‐ Erector spinae plane block
Comparison
paravertebral block
Outcome
Rates of block‐related adverse events

Summary of findings ‐ Erector spinae plane block probably leads to lower rates of block‐related adverse events compared with paravertebral block (moderate certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Summary of findings ‐ Erector spinae plane block vs paravertebral block
Rates of block‐related adverse events · adults undergoing surgery with general anaesthesia
Summary of findings ‐ Erector spinae plane block probably leads to lower rates of block‐related adverse events compared with paravertebral block (moderate certainty).
Erector spinae plane block for postoperative pain (2024) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.1 [0.02, 0.55]7 studies · 522 participantsModerate

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Erector spinae plane block for postoperative pain
2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedNot extractedNot assessed

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.