Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

288 questions in 13 reviews · Dental public health and special care

current versions
No studies 73 · 25.3%Ungraded 90 · 31.3%Very low 90 · 31.3%Low 29 · 10.1%Moderate 6 · 2.1%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Oral hygiene care training of carers vs No training (or a placebo training session) of carers
Behaviour, attitude and self-efficacy of carers (medium term) · People with mixed levels of ID (age range unclear); setting residential · Medium term (6 weeks to 12 months)
Oral hygiene interventions for people with intellectual disabilities (2019) · Cochrane
MD 0.15 [-0.80, 1.10]2 studies · 189 participantsVery low
Special manual toothbrush (self, carer or carer-assisted brushing) vs Conventional manual toothbrush (self, carer or carer-assisted brushing)
Plaque (short term) · Children and adults with mixed levels of ID; setting home, residential, day care, school, mixed or not specified · Short term (<6 weeks)
Oral hygiene interventions for people with intellectual disabilities (2019) · Cochrane
MD 0.20 [-0.45, 0.85]1 study · 25 participantsVery low
Special manual toothbrush (self, carer or carer-assisted brushing) vs Conventional manual toothbrush (self, carer or carer-assisted brushing)
Gingival inflammation (short term) · Children and adults with mixed levels of ID; setting home, residential, day care, school, mixed or not specified · Short term (<6 weeks)
Oral hygiene interventions for people with intellectual disabilities (2019) · Cochrane
MD -0.10 [-0.77, 0.57]1 study · 25 participantsLow
Special manual toothbrush (self, carer or carer-assisted brushing) vs Conventional manual toothbrush (self, carer or carer-assisted brushing)
Plaque (medium term) · Children and adults with mixed levels of ID; setting home, residential, day care, school, mixed or not specified · Medium term (6 weeks to 12 months)
Oral hygiene interventions for people with intellectual disabilities (2019) · Cochrane
MD -0.44 [-0.93, 0.05]1 study · 18 participantsVery low
Oral hygiene care training of carers vs No training (or a placebo training session) of carers
Oral health knowledge of carers (medium term) · People with mixed levels of ID (age range unclear); setting residential · Medium term (6 weeks to 12 months)
Oral hygiene interventions for people with intellectual disabilities (2019) · Cochrane
MD 0.69 [0.31, 1.06]2 studies · 189 participantsLow
Electric toothbrush (self, carer or carer-assisted brushing) vs Manual toothbrush (self, carer or carer-assisted brushing)
Plaque (short term) · Children and adults with mixed levels of ID; setting home, residential, day care, school, mixed or not specified · Short term (<6 weeks)
Oral hygiene interventions for people with intellectual disabilities (2019) · Cochrane
Assorted plaque indices scale 0-5, 1-4 weeks; 247 participants (4 RCTs); Very Low. Uncertain effect on plaque short term: 2 studies (69 participants) favoured the electric toothbrush; 2 studies (178 participants)…4 studies · 247 participantsVery low
Oral hygiene training (toothbrushing routine) of people with ID vs No oral hygiene training of people with ID
Gingival inflammation (short term) · Children and adults with mild to profound ID; setting residential or school · Short term (<6 weeks)
Oral hygiene interventions for people with intellectual disabilities (2019) · Cochrane
MD -0.28 [-0.90, 0.34]1 study · 10 participantsVery low
Individualised oral care plan based on a multidisciplinary assessment vs Usual care (regular oral hygiene care following the institution's standard guidelines)
Plaque (medium term) · Adults aged 22 to 57 years with mixed levels of ID; setting residential · Medium term (6 weeks to 12 months)
Oral hygiene interventions for people with intellectual disabilities (2019) · Cochrane
Individualised oral care plan vs usual care. Subjective Oral Hygiene Rating scale 1-5 and Improvement Differential, mean 12 months; SOHR 2.97 (intervention) vs 3.10 (control); improvement differential 38% vs 5%; 79…1 study · 79 participantsVery low
Oral hygiene care training of carers vs No training (or a placebo training session) of carers
Gingival inflammation (medium term) · People with mixed levels of ID (age range unclear); setting residential · Medium term (6 weeks to 12 months)
Oral hygiene interventions for people with intellectual disabilities (2019) · Cochrane
MD -0.09 [-0.63, 0.45]2 studies · 99 participantsLow
Daily toothbrushing by a dental student vs Twice-weekly or once-weekly toothbrushing by a dental student
Gingival inflammation (short term) · People aged 15 to 30 years with mixed levels of ID; setting residential · Short term (<6 weeks)
Oral hygiene interventions for people with intellectual disabilities (2019) · Cochrane
Daily vs twice-weekly or once-weekly toothbrushing by dental students. Buccal and labial Loe & Silness index, mean 21 days; 80 participants (1 RCT); Low. Brushing daily most likely reduced gingival inflammation more…1 study · 80 participantsLow
Special manual toothbrush (self, carer or carer-assisted brushing) vs Conventional manual toothbrush (self, carer or carer-assisted brushing)
Gingival inflammation (medium term) · Children and adults with mixed levels of ID; setting home, residential, day care, school, mixed or not specified · Medium term (6 weeks to 12 months)
Oral hygiene interventions for people with intellectual disabilities (2019) · Cochrane
MD -12.40 [-24.31, -0.49]1 study · 18 participantsVery low
Oral hygiene interventions (mechanical plaque removal): knowledge-based, behavioural, or skills training for people with ID or their carers vs Usual care, no care, or a similar alternative intervention
Quality of life changes or long-term, patient-centred outcomes (e.g. tooth retention) · People with intellectual disabilities (ID), living at home, in day care, in hospital or in a residential care setting;…
Oral hygiene interventions for people with intellectual disabilities (2019) · Cochrane
No studies measured quality of life changes or long-term, patient-centred outcomes as formal outcomes; some studies commented on quality of life only in the discussion or conclusion sections.0 studiesNo studies
Discussion of individual clinical photographs (plaque highlighted by a disclosing agent) as an oral hygiene motivator, plus oral hygiene instruction vs No discussion of clinical photographs, but received the same oral hygiene instruction
Plaque (medium term) · People with ID (level of ID and age unclear); setting day centre · Medium term (6 weeks to 12 months)
Oral hygiene interventions for people with intellectual disabilities (2019) · Cochrane
MD -0.10 [-0.85, 0.65]1 study · 29 participantsVery low
Electric toothbrush (self, carer or carer-assisted brushing) vs Manual toothbrush (self, carer or carer-assisted brushing)
Calculus (medium term) · Children and adults with mixed levels of ID; setting home, residential, day care, school, mixed or not specified · Medium term (6 weeks to 12 months)
Oral hygiene interventions for people with intellectual disabilities (2019) · Cochrane
SMD -0.04 [-0.40, 0.32]2 studies · 120 participantsLow
Personalised one-to-one OHA vs Routine one-to-one OHA
Patient-reported changes in knowledge, attitudes and quality of life · Children or adults (fit and healthy, or with a well-defined medical condition)
One‐to‐one oral hygiene advice provided in a dental setting for oral health (2018) · Cochrane
Jonsson 2009 (OHQoL-UK oral health-related quality of life) and Ramsay 2018 (dental quality of life, oral hygiene self-efficacy); measured, not synthesised or GRADE-rated.2 studiesUngraded
Any form of one-to-one oral hygiene advice (OHA) vs No OHA
Probing depth · Children or adults (fit and healthy, or with a well-defined medical condition)
One‐to‐one oral hygiene advice provided in a dental setting for oral health (2018) · Cochrane
Hetland 1982 reported pocket depths > 4 mm; measured but not synthesised or GRADE-rated (no usable pooled estimate).1 studyUngraded
Any form of one-to-one oral hygiene advice (OHA) vs No OHA
Dental caries · Children or adults (fit and healthy, or with a well-defined medical condition) · 4 to 12 months
One‐to‐one oral hygiene advice provided in a dental setting for oral health (2018) · Cochrane
SoF: 1 study in adults reported only 'small and statistically insignificant changes' but no usable data; the other study on infants provided evidence of a benefit for OHA at 8 and 12 months but not at 4 months.…2 studies · 244 participantsVery low
Self-management (self-administered/self-monitored OHA) vs Professional OHA
Periodontal health: gingivitis · Children or adults (fit and healthy, or with a well-defined medical condition) · 2 to 6 months
One‐to‐one oral hygiene advice provided in a dental setting for oral health (2018) · Cochrane
SoF: 2 studies reported no significant differences but no usable data; 1 study showed little or no difference at 3 months; 1 study in adults with hyposalivation gave weak evidence of a benefit in gingivitis for…4 studies · 181 participantsVery low
Any form of one-to-one oral hygiene advice (OHA) vs No OHA
Periodontal health: gingivitis · Children or adults (fit and healthy, or with a well-defined medical condition) · 3 to 36 months
One‐to‐one oral hygiene advice provided in a dental setting for oral health (2018) · Cochrane
SoF: 1 small study in adults had contradictory results at 3 and 6 months; the other study in adults showed evidence of a benefit for OHA at all time points (12, 24, 36 months). Results: Hetland 1982 MD 0.25 (0.05 to…2 studies · 235 participantsVery low
Personalised one-to-one OHA vs Routine one-to-one OHA
Probing depth · Children or adults (fit and healthy, or with a well-defined medical condition)
One‐to‐one oral hygiene advice provided in a dental setting for oral health (2018) · Cochrane
Jonsson 2009 and Ramsay 2018 reported probing depths; measured but not synthesised or GRADE-rated.2 studiesUngraded
Personalised one-to-one OHA vs Routine one-to-one OHA
Patient-reported behaviour changes and health indices · Children or adults (fit and healthy, or with a well-defined medical condition)
One‐to‐one oral hygiene advice provided in a dental setting for oral health (2018) · Cochrane
Ramsay 2018 (oral health behaviour) and Jonsson 2009 (patient-reported health indices: GOHAI and self-rated oral health); measured, not synthesised or GRADE-rated.2 studiesUngraded
Enhanced one-to-one OHA vs One-to-one OHA (standard)
Probing depth · Children or adults (fit and healthy, or with a well-defined medical condition)
One‐to‐one oral hygiene advice provided in a dental setting for oral health (2018) · Cochrane
Bali 1999 (probing depths) and Soderholm 1982 (pocket depths > 5 mm); measured but not synthesised or GRADE-rated.2 studiesUngraded
Self-management (self-administered/self-monitored OHA) vs Professional OHA
Probing depth · Children or adults (fit and healthy, or with a well-defined medical condition)
One‐to‐one oral hygiene advice provided in a dental setting for oral health (2018) · Cochrane
Jonsson 2006 (probing depth) and Lopez-Jornet 2014 (CPITN score); measured but not synthesised or GRADE-rated.2 studiesUngraded
Self-management (self-administered/self-monitored OHA) vs Professional OHA
Patient-reported behaviour changes · Children or adults (fit and healthy, or with a well-defined medical condition)
One‐to‐one oral hygiene advice provided in a dental setting for oral health (2018) · Cochrane
Baab 1986 (time spent brushing, number of oral hygiene aids), Aljafari 2017 (child's dietary habits, self-reported snacking and toothbrushing), Jonsson 2006 (oral self-care habits); measured, not synthesised or…3 studiesUngraded
Personalised one-to-one OHA vs Routine one-to-one OHA
Periodontal health: gingivitis · Children or adults (fit and healthy, or with a well-defined medical condition) · 2 to 36 months
One‐to‐one oral hygiene advice provided in a dental setting for oral health (2018) · Cochrane
SoF: 1 large study showed little or no difference at 36 months; 1 study showed a benefit for personalised OHA at 3 and 12 months; 1 study in children reported 'statistically significant (P < 0.05) improvement' but no…4 studies · 1635 participantsVery low
Personalised one-to-one OHA vs Routine one-to-one OHA
Dental caries · Children or adults (fit and healthy, or with a well-defined medical condition) · 2 months
One‐to‐one oral hygiene advice provided in a dental setting for oral health (2018) · Cochrane
SoF: 1 study in children between the ages of 1 year and 6 years old reported 'statistically significant (P < 0.05) improvement' for personalised OHA but did not report usable data. Results: Lepore 2011 not estimable…1 study · 69 participantsVery low
Any form of one-to-one oral hygiene advice (OHA) vs No OHA
Patient-reported changes in knowledge, attitudes and quality of life · Children or adults (fit and healthy, or with a well-defined medical condition)
One‐to‐one oral hygiene advice provided in a dental setting for oral health (2018) · Cochrane
Hoogstraten 1983 (dental knowledge, attitude, behaviour, fear of dental treatment) and Memarpour 2016 (parents' knowledge and performance regarding oral health); measured, not synthesised or GRADE-rated.2 studiesUngraded
Self-management (self-administered/self-monitored OHA) vs Professional OHA
Patient satisfaction with advice provided · Children or adults (fit and healthy, or with a well-defined medical condition)
One‐to‐one oral hygiene advice provided in a dental setting for oral health (2018) · Cochrane
Aljafari 2017 reported parent and child satisfaction with their educational intervention; measured, not synthesised or GRADE-rated.1 studyUngraded
Enhanced one-to-one OHA vs One-to-one OHA (standard)
Periodontal health: gingivitis · Children or adults (fit and healthy, or with a well-defined medical condition) · 2 to 12 months
One‐to‐one oral hygiene advice provided in a dental setting for oral health (2018) · Cochrane
SoF: 2 studies did not report usable data; 1 study gave low-quality evidence of a benefit in gingivitis reduction at 5.5 months for enhanced OHA; 3 studies found little or no difference across all time points. Results:…5 studies · 430 participantsVery low
Enhanced one-to-one OHA vs One-to-one OHA (standard)
Patient-reported behaviour changes · Children or adults (fit and healthy, or with a well-defined medical condition)
One‐to‐one oral hygiene advice provided in a dental setting for oral health (2018) · Cochrane
Tedesco 1992 reported self-reported brushing and flossing behaviours and self-efficacy (Oral Health Behavior Expectation Scale); measured, not synthesised or GRADE-rated.1 studyUngraded
Self-management (self-administered/self-monitored OHA) vs Professional OHA
Dental caries · Children or adults (fit and healthy, or with a well-defined medical condition)
One‐to‐one oral hygiene advice provided in a dental setting for oral health (2018) · Cochrane
No studies were found that looked at dental caries.0 studiesNo studies
Enhanced one-to-one OHA vs One-to-one OHA (standard)
Dental caries · Children or adults (fit and healthy, or with a well-defined medical condition) · 12 months
One‐to‐one oral hygiene advice provided in a dental setting for oral health (2018) · Cochrane
SoF: 1 study in adults did not report usable data. Results: Bali 1999 (DMFT) not estimable (no usable data).1 study · 70 participantsVery low
Enhanced one-to-one OHA vs One-to-one OHA (standard)
Periodontal health: plaque levels · Children or adults (fit and healthy, or with a well-defined medical condition) · 2 to 12 months
One‐to‐one oral hygiene advice provided in a dental setting for oral health (2018) · Cochrane
SoF: 2 studies did not report usable data; 1 study gave low-quality evidence of a benefit in plaque reduction at 5.5 months for enhanced OHA; 3 studies found little or no difference; 1 study gave weak evidence of a…6 studies · 440 participantsVery low
Enhanced one-to-one OHA vs One-to-one OHA (standard)
Patient-reported changes in knowledge, attitudes and quality of life · Children or adults (fit and healthy, or with a well-defined medical condition)
One‐to‐one oral hygiene advice provided in a dental setting for oral health (2018) · Cochrane
Hoogstraten 1983 (dental knowledge, attitude, behaviour, fear), Munster Halvari 2012 (multiple psychological measures: autonomy, motivation, perceived competence), Tedesco 1992 (theory of reasoned action variables);…3 studiesUngraded
Personalised one-to-one OHA vs Routine one-to-one OHA
Economic net benefits (cost effectiveness) · Children or adults (fit and healthy, or with a well-defined medical condition)
One‐to‐one oral hygiene advice provided in a dental setting for oral health (2018) · Cochrane
Ramsay 2018 reported economic net benefits of OHA; measured, not synthesised or GRADE-rated.1 studyUngraded
Personalised one-to-one OHA vs Routine one-to-one OHA
Periodontal health: plaque levels · Children or adults (fit and healthy, or with a well-defined medical condition) · 2 to 12 months
One‐to‐one oral hygiene advice provided in a dental setting for oral health (2018) · Cochrane
SoF: 1 study showed a benefit for personalised OHA at 3 and 12 months; 1 study in children reported 'statistically significant (P < 0.05) improvement' but no usable data; 1 study showed little or no difference at 3…3 studies · 308 participantsVery low
Any form of one-to-one oral hygiene advice (OHA) vs No OHA
Adverse events · Children or adults (fit and healthy, or with a well-defined medical condition)
One‐to‐one oral hygiene advice provided in a dental setting for oral health (2018) · Cochrane
No adverse events due to OHA were reported in the included trials (review-wide; assessed across all 19 included studies).NRUngraded
Any form of one-to-one oral hygiene advice (OHA) vs No OHA
Periodontal health: plaque levels · Children or adults (fit and healthy, or with a well-defined medical condition) · 6 to 36 months
One‐to‐one oral hygiene advice provided in a dental setting for oral health (2018) · Cochrane
SoF: Both studies at all time points consistently showed a benefit in plaque reduction for OHA. Results: Hetland 1982 MD -0.41 (-0.54 to -0.28) at 3mo, -0.44 (-0.56 to -0.32) at 6mo; Hugoson 2007 MD -13.00 (-19.89 to…2 studies · 235 participantsLow
Self-management (self-administered/self-monitored OHA) vs Professional OHA
Patient-reported changes in knowledge, attitudes and quality of life · Children or adults (fit and healthy, or with a well-defined medical condition)
One‐to‐one oral hygiene advice provided in a dental setting for oral health (2018) · Cochrane
Aljafari 2017 reported child's dietary knowledge; measured, not synthesised or GRADE-rated.1 studyUngraded
Self-management (self-administered/self-monitored OHA) vs Professional OHA
Periodontal health: plaque levels · Children or adults (fit and healthy, or with a well-defined medical condition) · 2 to 6 months
One‐to‐one oral hygiene advice provided in a dental setting for oral health (2018) · Cochrane
SoF: 2 studies reported no significant differences but no usable data; 1 study gave weak evidence of a benefit in plaque reduction at 3 months for self-management; 1 study in adults with hyposalivation gave very weak…4 studies · 181 participantsVery low
Oral health education (advice and training) vs Standard care (oral health advice not specifically emphasised beyond usual care)
Service use: Emergency medical/dental treatment · People with serious mental illness (all included participants had schizophrenia); majority aged 18 to 65 years per…
Oral health education (advice and training) for people with serious mental illness (2016) · Cochrane
No study reported useable data0 studiesNo studies
Educational intervention with information and practical components (theoretical oral health education plus practical skills training) for nursing staff and/or residents vs (Optimised) usual care
Denture plaque · Nursing home residents (mean age 78.3 to 86.0 years; more than 66% women; 62.1% to 87.3% with dental prostheses) · 3 to 60 months
Oral health educational interventions for nursing home staff and residents (2016) · Cochrane
SMD -0.60 [-1.25, 0.05]5 studies · 816 participantsLow
Educational intervention with information and practical components (theoretical oral health education plus practical skills training) for nursing staff and/or residents vs (Optimised) usual care
Caries/root caries · Nursing home residents (mean age 78.3 to 86.0 years; more than 66% women; 62.1% to 87.3% with dental prostheses) · 6 to 18 months
Oral health educational interventions for nursing home staff and residents (2016) · Cochrane
SoF: Caries/root caries (follow-up 6 to 18 months). No meta-analysis. 178 participants (2 RCTs); low quality. Comment: 2 studies at unclear (Frenkel 2001) or high risk of bias (Mojon 1998) showed no apparent…2 studies · 178 participantsLow
Educational intervention with information and practical components (theoretical oral health education plus practical skills training) for nursing staff and/or residents vs (Optimised) usual care
Nutritional status · Nursing home residents (mean age 78.3 to 86.0 years; more than 66% women; 62.1% to 87.3% with dental prostheses)
Oral health educational interventions for nursing home staff and residents (2016) · Cochrane
OR 1.0 [0.3, 3.1]1 studyUngraded
Monitoring (any means of observation, supervision, keeping under review, measuring or testing at intervals) vs No monitoring
Oral health: Not brushing teeth twice a day · People with serious mental illness (all included participants had schizophrenia); majority aged 18 to 65 years per…
Oral health education (advice and training) for people with serious mental illness (2016) · Cochrane
No study reported useable data0 studiesNo studies
Oral health education (advice and training) vs Standard care (oral health advice not specifically emphasised beyond usual care)
Leaving the study early · People with serious mental illness (all included participants had schizophrenia); majority aged 18 to 65 years per…
Oral health education (advice and training) for people with serious mental illness (2016) · Cochrane
RR 1.67 [0.45, 6.24]1 study · 50 participantsModerate
Oral health education (advice and training) vs Standard care (oral health advice not specifically emphasised beyond usual care)
Dental state: No clinically important change in plaque index · People with serious mental illness (all included participants had schizophrenia); majority aged 18 to 65 years per…
Oral health education (advice and training) for people with serious mental illness (2016) · Cochrane
MD -0.5 [-0.62, -0.38]1 study · 40 participantsVery low
Oral health education (advice and training) vs Standard care (oral health advice not specifically emphasised beyond usual care)
Oral health: Not brushing teeth twice a day · People with serious mental illness (all included participants had schizophrenia); majority aged 18 to 65 years per…
Oral health education (advice and training) for people with serious mental illness (2016) · Cochrane
No study reported useable data0 studiesNo studies
Motivational interview plus oral health education vs Oral health education
Quality of life: Chronic pain · People with serious mental illness (all included participants had schizophrenia); majority aged 18 to 65 years per…
Oral health education (advice and training) for people with serious mental illness (2016) · Cochrane
No study reported useable data0 studiesNo studies
Educational intervention with information and practical components (theoretical oral health education plus practical skills training) for nursing staff and/or residents vs (Optimised) usual care
Oral health-related attitude of nursing staff · Nursing home nursing staff (approximately 95% female in the two contributing studies)
Oral health educational interventions for nursing home staff and residents (2016) · Cochrane
SMD 0.30 [-0.23, 0.83]2 studies · 459 participantsUngraded