evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

285 questions · 304 findings · 22 reviews · Effective Practice and Organisation of Care

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 112 · 36.8%GRADE not reported 9 · 3%Very low 84 · 27.6%Low 65 · 21.4%Moderate 31 · 10.2%High 3 · 1%

Interventions targeting patients vs usual care or interventions of the same type

Shared decision making (PROM, continuous) ( · patients, including healthcare consumers and simulated patients
2 findings from 1 review

Interventions targeting patients vs usual care or interventions of the same type

Decision regret · patients, including healthcare consumers and simulated patients

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

2 findings from 1 review

Interventions targeting patients vs usual care or interventions of the same type

Health‐related quality of life (physical) · patients, including healthcare consumers and simulated patients

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

2 findings from 1 review

Interventions targeting patients vs usual care or interventions of the same type

Health‐related quality of life (mental) · patients, including healthcare consumers and simulated patients

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

2 findings from 1 review

Interventions targeting patients vs usual care or interventions of the same type

Costs · patients, including healthcare consumers and simulated patients

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

2 findings from 1 review

Patient information interventions vs comparisons to improve professional performance

Undesirable patient health outcomes · general patient population, "at risk" patient population and patient population with a specific condition or disease

It is very uncertain whether patient information interventions changes undesirable patient health outcomes (0‐12 months compared with comparisons to improve professional performance (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Patient information interventions vs comparisons to improve professional performance

Patient satisfaction Number of satisfied patients · general patient population, "at risk" patient population and patient population with a specific condition or disease

Patient information interventions showed no clear difference in patient satisfaction Number of satisfied patients (0‐3 months compared with comparisons to improve professional performance (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Patient information interventions vs comparisons to improve professional performance

Adherence to recommended clinical practice (0‐12 months · general patient population, "at risk" patient population and patient population with a specific condition or disease

Patient information interventions may leads to higher adherence to recommended clinical practice (0‐12 months compared with comparisons to improve professional performance (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Patient information interventions vs comparisons to improve professional performance

Desirable patient health outcomes (3‐12 months · general patient population, "at risk" patient population and patient population with a specific condition or disease

Patient information interventions showed no clear difference in desirable patient health outcomes (3‐12 months compared with comparisons to improve professional performance (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Decision aids for informed consent vs comparisons to improve professional performance

Adherence to recommended clinical practice (0‐12 months · patient population with a specific condition or disease

Patient decision aid interventions showed no clear difference in adherence to recommended clinical practice (12 months compared with comparisons to improve professional performance (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review