Adverse events · people with age‐related cataract
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Quality of life · people with age‐related cataract
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Mean change of endothelial cell loss · people with age‐related cataract
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Low
Central corneal thickness · people with age‐related cataract
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Low
Adverse events (corneal edema) · people with age‐related cataract
Larger coaxial microincision cataract surgery (C‐MICS) led to higher adverse events (corneal edema) compared with standard phacoemulsification; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 1.02
Studies not reported
GRADE not reported
Quality of life · people with age‐related cataract
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Mean postoperative surgically induced astigmatism · people with age‐related cataract
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Very low
Mean postoperative best‐corrected visual acuity · people with age‐related cataract
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Low
Mean change of endothelial cell loss · people with age‐related cataract
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Low
Intraocular inflammation measured by anterior chamber cell and flare 1 week · people who received phacoemulsification
1 finding from 1 review
Proportion of participants with best‐corrected visual acuity of 20/40 1 week · people who received phacoemulsification
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Proportion of participants with cystoid macular edema 1 week · people who received phacoemulsification
Summary of findings for NSAIDs plus corticosteroids may leads to lower proportion of participants with cystoid macular edema 1 week compared with corticosteroids alone (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Time to cessation of treatment · people who received phacoemulsification
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Adverse events · people who received phacoemulsification
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Economic outcomes · people who received phacoemulsification
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intraocular inflammation measured by proportion of participants with corneal edema 1 week · people who received phacoemulsification
Summary of findings for NSAIDs showed no clear difference in intraocular inflammation measured by proportion of participants with… compared with corticosteroids (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Proportion of participants with best‐corrected visual acuity of 20/40 1 week · people who received phacoemulsification
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Proportion of participants with cystoid macular edema 1 week · people who received phacoemulsification
Summary of findings for NSAIDs may leads to lower proportion of participants with cystoid macular edema 1 week compared with corticosteroids (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Time to cessation of treatment · people who received phacoemulsification
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Adverse events · people who received phacoemulsification
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found