Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

185 questions · 194 findings · 16 reviews · Urology

No studies found 40 · 20.6%GRADE not reported 15 · 7.7%Very low 29 · 14.9%Low 71 · 36.6%Moderate 35 · 18%High 4 · 2.1%

Sunitinib vs atezolizumab + bevacizumab (targeted agent versus immunotherapy + targeted agent)

Overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival rate at 24 months) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)

It is very uncertain whether sunitinib changes overall survival(absolute effect size estimates based on survival… compared with atezolizumab + bevacizumab (targeted agent versus immunotherapy +… (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sunitinib vs atezolizumab + bevacizumab (targeted agent versus immunotherapy + targeted agent)

Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)

It is very uncertain whether sunitinib changes serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) compared with atezolizumab + bevacizumab (targeted agent versus immunotherapy +… (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sunitinib vs IMA901 + sunitinib (targeted agent versus tumour vaccine + targeted agent)

Progression‐free survival · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)

It is very uncertain whether sunitinib changes progression‐free survival (absolute effect size estimates based on… compared with IMA901 + sunitinib (targeted agent versus tumour vaccine + targeted… (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sunitinib vs IMA901 + sunitinib (targeted agent versus tumour vaccine + targeted agent)

Overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival rate at 12 months) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)

Sunitinib showed no clear difference in overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival… compared with IMA901 + sunitinib (targeted agent versus tumour vaccine + targeted… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sunitinib vs IMA901 + sunitinib (targeted agent versus tumour vaccine + targeted agent)

Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)

Sunitinib may leads to lower serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) compared with IMA901 + sunitinib (targeted agent versus tumour vaccine + targeted… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sunitinib vs IFN‐α (targeted agent versus classic immunotherapy)

Progression‐free survival (PSF) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)

Sunitinib probably leads to lower progression‐free survival (absolute effect size estimates based on… compared with interferon‐α (IFN‐α) (targeted agent versus classic immunotherapy) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sunitinib vs IFN‐α (targeted agent versus classic immunotherapy)

Overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival rate at 24 months) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)

Sunitinib showed no clear difference in overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival… compared with interferon‐α (IFN‐α) (targeted agent versus classic immunotherapy) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sunitinib vs IFN‐α (targeted agent versus classic immunotherapy)

Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)

Sunitinib probably leads to higher serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4)assessed as: CTCAE v3.0 compared with interferon‐α (IFN‐α) (targeted agent versus classic immunotherapy) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Temsirolimus vs IFN‐α (targeted agent versus classic immunotherapy)

Progression‐free survival · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (any cell type)

Temsirolimus may leads to lower progression‐free survival (absolute effect size estimates based on… compared with IFN‐α (targeted agent versus classic immunotherapy) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Temsirolimus vs IFN‐α (targeted agent versus classic immunotherapy)

Overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival rate at 12 months) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (any cell type)

Temsirolimus probably leads to lower overall survival survival (absolute effect size estimates based on… compared with IFN‐α (targeted agent versus classic immunotherapy) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sunitinib vs atezolizumab (targeted therapy versus immunotherapy)

Progression‐free survival · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)

It is very uncertain whether sunitinib changes progression‐free survival (absolute effect size estimates based on… compared with atezolizumab (targeted therapy versus immunotherapy) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sunitinib vs atezolizumab (targeted therapy versus immunotherapy)

Overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival rate at 24 months) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)

It is very uncertain whether sunitinib changes overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival… compared with atezolizumab (targeted therapy versus immunotherapy) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sunitinib vs atezolizumab (targeted therapy versus immunotherapy)

Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)

Sunitinib probably leads to higher serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) compared with atezolizumab (targeted therapy versus immunotherapy) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review