Infection (incident) · people with burns
It is very uncertain whether honey changes infection (incident) compared with non‐antibacterial (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Infection (persistent) · people with burns
It is very uncertain whether honey changes infection (persistent) compared with non‐antibacterial (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events · people with burns
1 finding from 1 review
Oral mucositis (moderate to severe) · Patients with cancer receiving radiotherapy, chemotherapy or targeted therapies
Honey led to lower oral mucositis (moderate to severe) compared with no treatment; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 0.48 [0.31, 0.74]
3 studies
GRADE not reported
Oral mucositis (any severity) · Patients with cancer receiving radiotherapy, chemotherapy or targeted therapies
Honey led to lower oral mucositis (any severity) compared with no treatment; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 0.7 [0.56, 0.88]
3 studies
GRADE not reported
Oral mucositis (severe) · Patients with cancer receiving radiotherapy, chemotherapy or targeted therapies
Honey led to lower oral mucositis (severe) compared with no treatment; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 0.26 [0.13, 0.52]
3 studies
GRADE not reported
Presence of dry socket · Adults (>18 years) having permanent tooth extraction (predominantly mandibular third molars)
Honey (Manuka, topical) showed no clear difference in presence of dry socket compared with chlorhexidine rinse (0.2%); GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Elimination of aspiration on videofluoroscopy · adults with dementia and dysphagia
1 finding from 1 review
Complete wound healing · people with venous leg ulcers
It is very uncertain whether hydrogel dressings changes complete wound healing compared with manuka honey (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Wound infection · people with venous leg ulcers
It is very uncertain whether hydrogel dressings changes incidence of wound infection compared with manuka honey (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Change in ulcer size · people with venous leg ulcers
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Ulcer healing · people with venous leg ulcers
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Health‐related quality of life · people with venous leg ulcers
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Costs · people with venous leg ulcers
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Complete healing (time to healing) · patients with Venous leg ulcers
The intervention showed no clear difference in complete healing (time to healing) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Complete healing (proportion wounds healed) · patients with Venous leg ulcers
The intervention showed no clear difference in complete healing (proportion wounds healed) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Adverse events · patients with Venous leg ulcers
The intervention may leads to higher adverse events (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Infection · patients with Venous leg ulcers
The intervention showed no clear difference in infection (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Costs Incremental cost effectiveness ratio · patients with Venous leg ulcers
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Quality of Life SF‐36 PCS · patients with Venous leg ulcers
1 finding from 1 review