Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

138 questions · 141 findings · 9 reviews · Gynaecological, Neuro-oncology and Orphan Cancer

No studies found 27 · 19.1%GRADE not reported 4 · 2.8%Very low 25 · 17.7%Low 53 · 37.6%Moderate 27 · 19.1%High 5 · 3.5%

Chemotherapy with TKI (peptide‐Fc fusion protein) followed by TKI maintenance vs chemotherapy alone

Progression‐free survival (PSF) · newly‐diagnosed EOC

Chemotherapy with TKI (peptide‐Fc fusion protein) followed by TKI… showed no clear difference in progression‐free survival (PSF) compared with chemotherapy alone (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Chemotherapy with TKI (peptide‐Fc fusion protein) followed by TKI maintenance vs chemotherapy alone

Adverse events (grade ≥ 3) · newly‐diagnosed EOC

Chemotherapy with TKI (peptide‐Fc fusion protein) followed by TKI… probably leads to lower any adverse event grade ≥ 3 compared with chemotherapy alone (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Platinum‐sensitive recurrent EOC: PARPi with chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone

Progression‐free survival · platinum‐sensitive recurrent EOC

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Platinum‐sensitive recurrent EOC: PARPi… changes progression‐free survival (PFS) compared with chemotherapy alone (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Platinum‐sensitive recurrent EOC: PARPi with chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone

Adverse events (grade ≥ 3) · platinum‐sensitive recurrent EOC

Summary of findings table ‐ Platinum‐sensitive recurrent EOC: PARPi… showed no clear difference in any severe adverse event (grade 3 or higher) (G3+ SevAE) compared with chemotherapy alone (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Hysterectomy (radical) with neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs chemoradiotherapy alone

Death (all causes) · women with locally advanced cervical cancer

Hysterectomy (radical) with neoadjuvant chemotherapy showed no clear difference in overall survival Median compared with chemoradiotherapy alone (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Hysterectomy (radical) with neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs chemoradiotherapy alone

SAEs and toxicity · women with locally advanced cervical cancer

It is very uncertain whether hysterectomy (radical) with neoadjuvant chemotherapy changes SAEs and toxicity compared with chemoradiotherapy alone (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Hysterectomy (simple or radical) with neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs Radiotherapy alone

Death (all causes) · women with locally advanced cervical cancer

Hysterectomy (simple or radical) with neoadjuvant chemotherapy probably leads to lower overall survival Median compared with radiotherapy alone (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Hysterectomy (simple or radical) with neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs Radiotherapy alone

Disease or progression‐free survival Median · women with locally advanced cervical cancer

Hysterectomy (simple or radical) with neoadjuvant chemotherapy showed no clear difference in disease‐ or progression‐free survival Median compared with radiotherapy alone (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Hysterectomy (simple or radical) with neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs Radiotherapy alone

Severe adverse events and toxicity · women with locally advanced cervical cancer

Hysterectomy (simple or radical) with neoadjuvant chemotherapy showed no clear difference in severe adverse events and toxicity compared with radiotherapy alone (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review