Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,678 questions · 4,859 findings · 283 reviews

No studies found 1,225 · 25.2%GRADE not reported 215 · 4.4%Very low 1,241 · 25.5%Low 1,210 · 24.9%Moderate 776 · 16%High 192 · 4%

Summary of findings: oral β‐carotene vs placebo

FEV1 % predicted: absolute change from baseline · adults and children with cystic fibrosis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

2 findings from 1 review

Summary of findings: Trihexyphenidyl vs placebo

Adverse effectsb (mood disturbance, irritability, behavioural change, constipation) Measured by: counts of number and type · children with dystonic cerebral palsy

Summary of findings: Trihexyphenidyl may leads to higher adverse effectsb (mood disturbance, irritability, behavioural… compared with placebo (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: Trihexyphenidyl vs placebo

Participation in activities of daily living:individual goal setting Measured by: GAS (up to 5 functional goals scored on a 5‐point scale (−2 = much less than expected to +2 = much more than expected); higher score = better than expected outcome) · children with dystonic cerebral palsy
1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: Trihexyphenidyl vs placebo

Participation in activities of daily living:satisfaction with individual goals Measured by: satisfaction subscale of the COPM (satisfaction with performance in up to 5 problem areas scored on a 10‐point scale (1 = not satisfied at all to 10 = extr... · children with dystonic cerebral palsy
1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: Trihexyphenidyl vs placebo

Participation in activities of daily living:performance of individual goals Measured by: performance subscale of the COPM (up to five problem areas scored on a 10‐point scale (1 = not able to do to 10 = able to do extremely well; higher score = be... · children with dystonic cerebral palsy
1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: Hydrogel spacer vs no intervention

Acute and late GI toxicity (grade 2+) · Men undergoing RT for prostate cancer

Summary of findings: Hydrogel spacer showed no clear difference in acute and late GI toxicity (grade 2+) compared with no intervention (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review