Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

957 questions · 979 findings · 250 reviews

No studies found 159 · 16.2%GRADE not reported 75 · 7.7%Very low 264 · 27%Low 303 · 30.9%Moderate 138 · 14.1%High 40 · 4.1%

Computerised antenatal CTG vs traditional antenatal CTG (women at increased risk of complications)

Apgar score less than 7 at 5 minutes · Pregnant women with/without complications

It is very uncertain whether computerised antenatal CTG changes apgar less than 7 at 5 minutes compared with traditional antenatal CTG (women at increased risk of complications) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Traditional antenatal CTG vs no antenatal CTG (women at increased risk of complication)

Apgar score less than 7 at 5 minutes · Pregnant women with/without complications

It is very uncertain whether traditional antenatal CTG changes apgar less than 7 at 5 minutes compared with no antenatal CTG (women at increased risk of complication) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Traditional antenatal CTG vs no antenatal CTG (women at increased risk of complication)

Admission to neonatal special care unit or intensive care unit · Pregnant women with/without complications

Traditional antenatal CTG showed no clear difference in admission to neonatal special care unit or intensive care unit compared with no antenatal CTG (women at increased risk of complication) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Computerised antenatal CTG vs traditional antenatal CTG (women at increased risk of complications)

Perinatal mortality · Pregnant women with/without complications

Computerised antenatal CTG probably leads to lower perinatal mortality compared with traditional antenatal CTG (women at increased risk of complications) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review