Cochrane · systematic review · CD010160
Nurse‐led versus doctor‐led preoperative assessment for elective surgical patients requiring regional or general anaesthesia
Nicholson, A, Coldwell, CH, Lewis, SR, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2013 · Cochrane Library
AnaesthesiaAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
4
current version
GRADE rated
0
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 4 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Nurse‐led versus doctor‐led POA for elective surgical patients?
Population: elective surgical patients requiring regional or general anaesthesia
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Cancellation for clinical reasons Nurse‐led vs doctor‐led POA | no estimate extracted | 0 studies · 0 participants | Ungraded |
Cancellation by patient Nurse‐led vs doctor‐led POA | no estimate extracted | 0 studies · 0 participants | Ungraded |
Patient satisfaction with POA Nurse‐led vs doctor‐led POA | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 42 participants | Ungraded |
Gain in patient information or knowledge Nurse‐led vs doctor‐led POA | no estimate extracted | 0 studies · 0 participants | Ungraded |