Outcomes* · people with primary open‐angle glaucoma and no previous glaucoma surgery
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Control of intraocular pressure · people with primary open‐angle glaucoma and no previous glaucoma surgery
Low‐ showed no clear difference in control of intraocular pressure compared with high‐energy diode trans‐scleral cyclophotocoagulation (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Mean change in intraocular pressure · people with primary open‐angle glaucoma and no previous glaucoma surgery
1 finding from 1 review
Decrease in visual acuity · people with primary open‐angle glaucoma and no previous glaucoma surgery
Low‐ showed no clear difference in decrease in visual acuity compared with high‐energy diode trans‐scleral cyclophotocoagulation (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Mean visual field · people with primary open‐angle glaucoma and no previous glaucoma surgery
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Mean number of antiglaucoma medications at 1‐year · people with primary open‐angle glaucoma and no previous glaucoma surgery
1 finding from 1 review
Proportion needing additional glaucoma surgery at 1‐year · people with primary open‐angle glaucoma and no previous glaucoma surgery
Low‐ showed no clear difference in additional glaucoma surgery compared with high‐energy diode trans‐scleral cyclophotocoagulation (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events: atonic pupil · people with primary open‐angle glaucoma and no previous glaucoma surgery
Low‐ showed no clear difference in adverse events: atonic pupil compared with high‐energy diode trans‐scleral cyclophotocoagulation (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Resolution of symptoms · patients with trigger finger
Percutaneous surgery showed no clear difference in resolution of symptoms compared with open surgery (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Pain (1 to 6 scale) · patients with trigger finger
1 finding from 1 review
Function Not measured · patients with trigger finger
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
Participant global assessment of success Not measured · patients with trigger finger
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
Recurrence · patients with trigger finger
It is very uncertain whether percutaneous surgery changes recurrence compared with open surgery (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events (infection, partial loss of movement, tendon or pulley injury, oedema or inflammation or hematoma, adherence) · patients with trigger finger
It is very uncertain whether percutaneous surgery changes adverse events (infection, partial loss of movement, tendon or… compared with open surgery (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Neurovascular injury · patients with trigger finger
1 finding from 1 review
Resolution of symptoms · patients with trigger finger
It is very uncertain whether endoscopic surgery changes resolution of symptoms compared with open surgery (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Pain (short‐term) Not measured · patients with trigger finger
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
Function Not measured · patients with trigger finger
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
Participant global assessment of success Not measured · patients with trigger finger
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
Recurrence ‐ not measured · patients with trigger finger
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review