Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

949 questions · 1,008 findings · 130 reviews · Gynaecology and Fertility

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 195 · 19.3%GRADE not reported 30 · 3%Very low 346 · 34.3%Low 323 · 32%Moderate 101 · 10%High 13 · 1.3%

LNG‐IUS vs another combined low‐dose OCP

Haemoglobin level ‐ Haemoglobin level at 12 months Scale from: 0 to 20. · women with uterine fibroids

1 finding from 1 review

Progestogens or progestogen‐releasing intrauterine systems for uterine fibroids (other than preoperative medical… 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 44 participants
Very low

LNG‐IUS vs another combined low‐dose OCP

Fibroid size · women with uterine fibroids

1 finding from 1 review

Progestogens or progestogen‐releasing intrauterine systems for uterine fibroids (other than preoperative medical… 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 44 participants
Very low

LNG‐IUS vs another combined low‐dose OCP

Adverse events · women with uterine fibroids

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Progestogens or progestogen‐releasing intrauterine systems for uterine fibroids (other than preoperative medical… 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

LNG‐IUS vs oral progestogen (norethisterone acetate)

Change in fibroid related symptoms · women with uterine fibroids

1 finding from 1 review

Progestogens or progestogen‐releasing intrauterine systems for uterine fibroids (other than preoperative medical… 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 48 participants
Very low

LNG‐IUS vs oral progestogen (norethisterone acetate)

Change in haemoglobin level from baseline · women with uterine fibroids

2 findings from 1 review

Progestogens or progestogen‐releasing intrauterine systems for uterine fibroids (other than preoperative medical… 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 48 participants
Very low
Progestogens or progestogen‐releasing intrauterine systems for uterine fibroids (other than preoperative medical… 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 45 participants
Very low

LNG‐IUS vs oral progestogen (norethisterone acetate)

Fibroid size · women with uterine fibroids

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Progestogens or progestogen‐releasing intrauterine systems for uterine fibroids (other than preoperative medical… 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

UAE/UACE vs MTX

Treatment success rate · women with CSP

UAE/UACE showed no clear difference in treatment success after initial treatment UAE vs systemic MTX compared with systemic MTX (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for non‐tubal ectopic pregnancy 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1 [0.9, 1.12]
1 study · 72 participants
Low

Suction curettage under hysteroscopy vs under ultrasonography

Time to normalize β‐hCG after UAE · women with CSP

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for non‐tubal ectopic pregnancy 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 66 participants
Very low

UAE/UACE vs MTX

Complications UAE vs systemic MTX · women with CSP

UAE/UACE showed no clear difference in complications UAE vs systemic MTX compared with systemic MTX (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for non‐tubal ectopic pregnancy 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.47 [0.13, 1.75]
1 study · 72 participants
Low

UAE/UACE vs MTX

Adverse effects UAE vs systemic MTX · women with CSP

UAE/UACE showed no clear difference in adverse effects UAE vs systemic MTX compared with systemic MTX (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for non‐tubal ectopic pregnancy 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.58 [0.41, 6.11]
1 study · 72 participants
Low

UAE/UACE vs MTX

Blood loss UAE vs systemic MTX · women with CSP

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for non‐tubal ectopic pregnancy 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 72 participants
Moderate

UAE/UACE vs MTX

Time to normalize β‐hCG · women with CSP

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for non‐tubal ectopic pregnancy 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Suction curettage under hysteroscopy vs under ultrasonography

Treatment success after initial treatment after UAE · women with CSP

It is very uncertain whether suction curettage under hysteroscopy changes treatment success after initial treatment after UAE compared with under ultrasonography (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for non‐tubal ectopic pregnancy 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.91 [0.81, 1.03]
1 study · 66 participants
Very low

Suction curettage under hysteroscopy vs under ultrasonography

Complications after UAE · women with CSP

It is very uncertain whether suction curettage under hysteroscopy changes complications after UAE compared with under ultrasonography (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for non‐tubal ectopic pregnancy 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 4 [0.47, 33.91]
1 study · 66 participants
Very low

Suction curettage under hysteroscopy vs under ultrasonography

Adverse effects after UAE · women with CSP

It is very uncertain whether suction curettage under hysteroscopy changes adverse effects after UAE compared with under ultrasonography (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for non‐tubal ectopic pregnancy 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 3.09 [0.12, 78.7]
1 study · 66 participants
Very low

Suction curettage under hysteroscopy vs under ultrasonography

Blood loss · women with CSP

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for non‐tubal ectopic pregnancy 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Swim‐up technique vs gradient technique

Live birth rate per couple · patients undergoing intrauterine insemination (fresh semen)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Semen preparation techniques for intrauterine insemination 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Swim‐up technique vs wash and centrifugation

Miscarriage · patients undergoing intrauterine insemination (fresh semen)

1 finding from 1 review

Semen preparation techniques for intrauterine insemination 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 20 participants
Very low

Gradient technique vs wash and centrifugation

Live birth rate per couple · patients undergoing intrauterine insemination (fresh semen)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Semen preparation techniques for intrauterine insemination 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Gradient technique vs wash and centrifugation

Miscarriage · patients undergoing intrauterine insemination (fresh semen)

It is very uncertain whether gradient technique changes miscarriage rate per couple compared with wash and centrifugation (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Semen preparation techniques for intrauterine insemination 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 6.11 [0.27, 138.45]
1 study · 31 participants
Very low