Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

1,782 questions · 1,852 findings · 128 reviews · Effective Practice and Organisation of Care

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 557 · 30.1%GRADE not reported 53 · 2.9%Very low 446 · 24.1%Low 476 · 25.7%Moderate 255 · 13.8%High 65 · 3.5%

Value‐Based Purchasing vs capitation without P4P

Equity · Hospitals

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Pay for performance for hospitals 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Health‐promotion interventions within community pharmacy vs usual treatment alone

Pharmacy worker behaviour1 · community pharmacy workers (examples pharmacists, counter assistants etc), community pharmacy users

1 finding from 1 review

Community pharmacy interventions for health promotion: effects on professional practice and health outcomes 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2944 participants
Moderate

Health‐promotion interventions within community pharmacy vs usual treatment alone

Pharmacy user health‐related behaviour3 (Higher scores indicate a better outcome) · community pharmacy workers (examples pharmacists, counter assistants etc), community pharmacy users

1 finding from 1 review

Community pharmacy interventions for health promotion: effects on professional practice and health outcomes 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2138 participants
Moderate

Health‐promotion interventions within community pharmacy vs usual treatment alone

Pharmacy user intermediate clinical outcomes e.g. cholesterol, glycated haemoglobin5 (Lower scores indicate a better outcome) · community pharmacy workers (examples pharmacists, counter assistants etc), community pharmacy users

1 finding from 1 review

Community pharmacy interventions for health promotion: effects on professional practice and health outcomes 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3971 participants
Moderate

Health‐promotion interventions within community pharmacy vs usual treatment alone

Pharmacy user event‐based clinical outcomes e.g. stroke, myocardial infarction · community pharmacy workers (examples pharmacists, counter assistants etc), community pharmacy users

1 finding from 1 review

Community pharmacy interventions for health promotion: effects on professional practice and health outcomes 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
0 studies · 0 participants
GRADE not reported

Health‐promotion interventions within community pharmacy vs usual treatment alone

Pharmacy user quality of life6 (Higher scores indicate better quality of life) · community pharmacy workers (examples pharmacists, counter assistants etc), community pharmacy users

1 finding from 1 review

Community pharmacy interventions for health promotion: effects on professional practice and health outcomes 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2687 participants
Moderate

Health‐promotion interventions within community pharmacy vs usual treatment alone

Adverse events · community pharmacy workers (examples pharmacists, counter assistants etc), community pharmacy users

1 finding from 1 review

Community pharmacy interventions for health promotion: effects on professional practice and health outcomes 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
0 studies · 0 participants
GRADE not reported

Health‐promotion interventions within community pharmacy vs usual treatment alone

Costs · community pharmacy workers (examples pharmacists, counter assistants etc), community pharmacy users

1 finding from 1 review

Community pharmacy interventions for health promotion: effects on professional practice and health outcomes 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
7 participants
Moderate

Intervention not reported

Survival to hospital discharge (1 study) · Participants: Healthcare workers delivering life‐saving emergency care in a hospital setting (obstetric/labour and delivery staff,…

1 finding from 1 review

The effects of interactive training of healthcare providers on the management of life‐threatening emergencies in… 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
30 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

Morbidity rate (3 studies) · Participants: Healthcare workers delivering life‐saving emergency care in a hospital setting (obstetric/labour and delivery staff,…

1 finding from 1 review

The effects of interactive training of healthcare providers on the management of life‐threatening emergencies in… 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1778 participants
Very low

Intervention not reported

Protocol or guideline adherence (3 studies) · Participants: Healthcare workers delivering life‐saving emergency care in a hospital setting (obstetric/labour and delivery staff,…

1 finding from 1 review

The effects of interactive training of healthcare providers on the management of life‐threatening emergencies in… 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
156 participants
Very low

Intervention not reported

Patient outcomes (5 studies) · Participants: Healthcare workers delivering life‐saving emergency care in a hospital setting (obstetric/labour and delivery staff,…

1 finding from 1 review

The effects of interactive training of healthcare providers on the management of life‐threatening emergencies in… 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
951 participants
Very low

Intervention not reported

Clinical practice outcomes (4 studies) · Participants: Healthcare workers delivering life‐saving emergency care in a hospital setting (obstetric/labour and delivery staff,…

1 finding from 1 review

The effects of interactive training of healthcare providers on the management of life‐threatening emergencies in… 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1417 participants
Very low

Intervention not reported

Organisation of care (2 studies) · Participants: Healthcare workers delivering life‐saving emergency care in a hospital setting (obstetric/labour and delivery staff,…

1 finding from 1 review

The effects of interactive training of healthcare providers on the management of life‐threatening emergencies in… 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
634 participants
Very low

Non‐specialist‐led vs specialist‐led follow‐up after primary cancer treatment

Overall survival · adult cancer survivors from the following cancer sites: breast, colon, colorectal, endometrial, ovarian, cervical, melanoma and oesophageal

It is very uncertain whether non‐specialist‐led changes overall survival compared with specialist‐led follow‐up after primary cancer treatment (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Follow‐up strategies following completion of primary cancer treatment in adult cancer survivors 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
HR 1.21 [0.68, 2.15]
603 participants
Very low

Less intensive vs more intensive follow‐up after primary cancer treatment

Anxiety · adult cancer survivors from the following cancer sites: breast, colorectal, head‐and‐neck, Hodgkin lymphoma, melanoma, non‐small cell lung…

1 finding from 1 review

Follow‐up strategies following completion of primary cancer treatment in adult cancer survivors 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
180 participants
Very low

Less intensive vs more intensive follow‐up after primary cancer treatment

Depression · adult cancer survivors from the following cancer sites: breast, colorectal, head‐and‐neck, Hodgkin lymphoma, melanoma, non‐small cell lung…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Follow‐up strategies following completion of primary cancer treatment in adult cancer survivors 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Less intensive vs more intensive follow‐up after primary cancer treatment

Costs · adult cancer survivors from the following cancer sites: breast, colorectal, head‐and‐neck, Hodgkin lymphoma, melanoma, non‐small cell lung…

1 finding from 1 review

Follow‐up strategies following completion of primary cancer treatment in adult cancer survivors 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1412 participants
Very low

Follow‐up integrating additional patient symptom education or monitoring, or survivorship care plans vs usual care

Overall survival · adult cancer survivors from the following cancer sites: breast, colorectal, endometrial, ovarian and prostate cancer

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Follow‐up strategies following completion of primary cancer treatment in adult cancer survivors 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Follow‐up integrating additional patient symptom education or monitoring, or survivorship care plans vs usual care

Time to detection of recurrence · adult cancer survivors from the following cancer sites: breast, colorectal, endometrial, ovarian and prostate cancer

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Follow‐up strategies following completion of primary cancer treatment in adult cancer survivors 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found