HSV2 prevalence · Adolescents (10-19 years)
Educational interventions showed no clear difference in HSV2 prevalence compared with no intervention (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Syphillis prevalence · Adolescents (10-19 years)
Educational interventions showed no clear difference in syphillis prevalence compared with no intervention (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Pregnant at end of trial · Adolescents (10-19 years)
Educational interventions showed no clear difference in pregnant at end of trial compared with no intervention (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
HIV prevalence · Adolescents (10-19 years)
Incentive‐based programmes showed no clear difference in HIV prevalence compared with no intervention (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
HSV2 prevalence · Adolescents (10-19 years)
1 finding from 1 review
Syphillis prevalence · Adolescents (10-19 years)
It is very uncertain whether incentive‐based programmes changes syphillis prevalence compared with no intervention (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Pregnant at end of trial · Adolescents (10-19 years)
Incentive‐based programmes may leads to lower pregnant at end of trial compared with no intervention (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
HIV prevalence · Adolescents (10-19 years)
Combined incentive‐based and educational interventions showed no clear difference in HIV prevalence compared with no intervention (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Malaria parasite prevalence · people at risk of malaria
It is very uncertain whether habitat manipulation changes malaria parasite prevalence compared with no intervention (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
RR 0.01 [0, 0.16]
2 participants
Very low
Malaria parasite prevalence · people at risk of malaria
It is very uncertain whether habitat manipulation with larviciding changes malaria parasite prevalence compared with no intervention (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 0.59 [0.42, 0.83]
1 participants
Very low
Malaria parasite prevalence · people at risk of malaria
Habitat manipulation and modification with larviciding showed no clear difference in malaria parasite prevalence compared with no intervention (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 0.8 [0.41, 1.55]
1 participants
Moderate
Antimalarial prescribing to microscopy‐ or PCR‐negative people · people with suspected malaria
Malaria rapid diagnostic test (mRDT) probably leads to lower antimalarial prescribing to microscopy‐ or PCR‐negative people compared with clinical diagnosis (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
RR 0.17 [0.07, 0.4]
7877 participants
Moderate
Antibiotic prescribing to microscopy‐ or PCR‐negative people · people with suspected malaria
Malaria rapid diagnostic test (mRDT) probably leads to higher antibiotic prescribing to microscopy‐ or PCR‐negative people compared with clinical diagnosis (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
RR 2.02 [1.21, 3.37]
5179 participants
Moderate
Intervention not reported
Microfilaraemia (mf) prevalence · people with lymphatic filariasis or communities where lymphatic filariasis is endemic
The intervention showed no clear difference in microfilaraemia (mf) prevalence (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Antigenaemia prevalence · people with lymphatic filariasis or communities where lymphatic filariasis is endemic
The intervention showed no clear difference in antigenaemia prevalence (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Adult worm prevalence detected by ultrasound ‐ not measured · people with lymphatic filariasis or communities where lymphatic filariasis is endemic
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Microfilaraemia (mf) prevalence · people with lymphatic filariasis or communities where lymphatic filariasis is endemic
The intervention showed no clear difference in microfilaraemia (mf) prevalence (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Antigenaemia prevalence · people with lymphatic filariasis or communities where lymphatic filariasis is endemic
The intervention showed no clear difference in antigenaemia prevalence (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Adult worm prevalence detected by ultrasound · people with lymphatic filariasis or communities where lymphatic filariasis is endemic
The intervention showed no clear difference in adult worm prevalence detected by ultrasound (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Microfilaraemia (mf) prevalence · people with lymphatic filariasis or communities where lymphatic filariasis is endemic
The intervention showed no clear difference in microfilaraemia (mf) prevalence (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review