What do systematic reviews say?

PUL vs TURP

• Prostatic urethral lift for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 56 participants
  Low
• Prostatic urethral lift for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 59 participants
  Moderate

PUL vs sham

• Prostatic urethral lift for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 206 participants
  Low

PUL vs sham

• Prostatic urethral lift for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 206 participants
  Moderate

PUL vs sham

It is very uncertain whether PUL changes major adverse events compared with sham (very low certainty).

• Prostatic urethral lift for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 3.3 [0.41, 26.28]
  1 study · 206 participants
  Very low

PUL vs sham

• Prostatic urethral lift for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 206 participants
  Low

PUL vs sham

• Prostatic urethral lift for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 197 participants
  Moderate

PUL vs sham

• Prostatic urethral lift for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 144 participants
  Moderate

PUL vs TURP

• Prostatic urethral lift for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 72 participants
  Low
• Prostatic urethral lift for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 69 participants
  Low

PUL vs TURP

It is very uncertain whether PUL changes major adverse events compared with TURP (very low certainty).

• Prostatic urethral lift for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.64 [0.18, 2.19]
  1 study · 79 participants
  Very low
• Prostatic urethral lift for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Partial pulpotomy vs Full (complete) pulpotomy

No studies compared partial versus full pulpotomy in asymptomatic permanent teeth with deep caries, so no evidence is available.

• The effectiveness of partial pulpotomy compared with full pulpotomy in managing deep caries in vital permanent teeth… 2025 All outcomes
  no estimate extracted
  0 studies
  No studies found

Pulmonary rehabilitation vs no pulmonary rehabilitation

• Pulmonary rehabilitation for interstitial lung disease 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  13 studies · 585 participants
  Moderate
• Pulmonary rehabilitation for interstitial lung disease 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  6 studies · 321 participants
  Moderate

Pulmonary rehabilitation vs no pulmonary rehabilitation

• Pulmonary rehabilitation for interstitial lung disease 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  4 studies · 159 participants
  Low

Pulmonary rehabilitation vs no pulmonary rehabilitation

• Pulmonary rehabilitation for interstitial lung disease 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  7 studies · 348 participants
  Low

Pulmonary rehabilitation vs no pulmonary rehabilitation

• Pulmonary rehabilitation for interstitial lung disease 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  11 studies · 478 participants
  Moderate

Pulmonary rehabilitation vs no pulmonary rehabilitation

• Pulmonary rehabilitation for interstitial lung disease 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  4 studies · 240 participants
  Low

Pulmonary rehabilitation vs no pulmonary rehabilitation

Pulmonary rehabilitation showed no clear difference in long‐term survival (incidence of mortality) compared with no pulmonary rehabilitation (low certainty).

• Pulmonary rehabilitation for interstitial lung disease 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  OR 0.4 [0.14, 1.12]
  4 studies · 291 participants
  Low

High dose of manipulation vs low dose of manipulation

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Manipulation and mobilisation for neck pain contrasted against an inactive control or another active treatment 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

High dose of manipulation vs low dose of manipulation

High dose of manipulation showed no clear difference in chronic neck pain and CGH Intermediate‐term compared with low dose of manipulation (moderate certainty).

• Manipulation and mobilisation for neck pain contrasted against an inactive control or another active treatment 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 50 participants
  Moderate

High dose of manipulation vs low dose of manipulation

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Manipulation and mobilisation for neck pain contrasted against an inactive control or another active treatment 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

High dose of manipulation vs low dose of manipulation

• Manipulation and mobilisation for neck pain contrasted against an inactive control or another active treatment 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 participants
  GRADE not reported